>ruins the arm gains of thousands of young men

>>76262985 (OP)
>Fat, jewish, manlet ragebaits for views
I'll do a few extra sets of hammer curls next time

>>76262985 (OP)
What does he recommend instead for forearms? give a clearer picture.

>>76262994
disregard what he recommends and do literally anything else

>>76262994
>What does he recommend instead for forearms?
Leaning, single hand cable curls with no attachment, focus on the stretch.

>>76262985 (OP)
Isn't this guy's life story one long recurring failure to gain his IFBB pro card? Even after roiding, surgery, more roiding and a social media campaign? Speaking softly, pervert jokes and pretending to know "science" doesn't redeem that. Why should anyone listen to this jew?

>>76263149
His calling card is his appeal to autority because dimwits who haven't gone to uni think getting a PhD is hot shit while in actuality you can make a sham paper out of basically anything

>>76263149
Because he's a doctor that is stronger and smarter than Mike Mentzer

>>76263154
Yep, a degree in Sports Physiology from Eastern Tennessee State University

>>76262985 (OP)
But hammer curls are fucking dumb. He's right.

I've been doing hammer curls lately because of tendonitis in my elbow, fite me cunt.

>>76262985 (OP)
I got big bi's from spamming hammers
fuck this bald kike

>>76262985 (OP)
>literally jewing you out of your gains
hammer curls are a staple of any serious lifter's bicep rotation because they are flat out needed to grow your brachialis optimally, the forearm gains don't hurt, either

>>76263238
what's dumb about bigger arms?

>>76263251
Why, you think your tendonitis isn't painful enough already?

decline hammer curls gives insane bicep doms. How the fuck can he say that it dont work the fucking bicep?

>>76263441
muscle gain has been solved at this point
any new "educational" videos you see online is just useless retards making up bullshit to get views with this midget and the other midget who is supposedly natural being the biggest frauds

>>76262985 (OP)
>great for lats, abs, biceps, forearms, and lower back depending where you stimulate stability within your body, as any exercise
Stg “science” based lifters are coping with the inability to control individual muscle groups

>>76262985 (OP)
Both him and Nippard say cable curls are better than dumbbell curls

>>76263540
Neither have 20inch arms

>>76263540
do they say why? only benefit i can think of is that its easier to dropset

>>76263611
I would assume even tension through the motion. I do cable curls myself after stalling at 30 for 12 for months on incline dumbbell curls. They definitely feel great, and I'm progressing again, but wouldn't say they're outright better. They're more similar than dissimilar.

>>76263611
>less use of stabilizer muscles means more ability to focus on muscles actually being exercised
>even tension throughout means more time under tension = more stimulus for the same rep = more gains for less wear and tear on joints
You guys hate mike because he's jewish, he gives solid advice.

>>76263149
he's a lolcow

>>76263781
I have done cable curls and they suck, barbell/dumbell curls are much better.

>>76263303
Not him but it's practically completely healed mine.

>>76263781
they feel like shit