>>76309713 (OP)>Is two sets enough to grow a muscle?i usually go for 3 "sets" but yeah 2 is entirely enough, especially if u do more than 3 things at a time - yeah, than i go for 2
>huwhy not one cause u're not warm enough until u try
>but what about 3 exerscises per muscle group and 4 sets each? it's retarded, the shit u do is retarded and it doesn't do what is advertised, u need continuous tension on muscle belly entire duration of set, DOZENS, 2 or 3 DOZENS of seconds with load entire time on the muscle belly in question
>how so? like so:
>>76304935>n-noo u need 7 bench variations, flies, and some machines and none of it does what is advertised, i told u already bot :D
>what has van damme to do with it altogether human? he's got nice long head of biceps, nice peak, u achieve such peak by hugging basketball to your chest with protracted shoulder, use your wrist not palm, no curl has ever grown any biceps
>but is 2 sets enoughit is enough, provided "sets" are meaningful time under tension loading endevours, repping shit will only get u fucked up
>do u like my roidoot hiding gyno under t-shirt picture human ? it's a.i slop bitch bot gpt D: u r not fooling me :D