>>76314270 yes. you see. actually. uhh. on the left hand side of the uhhh graph. the people with a BMI of of... less than uhhh 26. died of cancer. as you can see. cancer is a BIGGER problem then you thought!
>>76314299 >>76314301 Its just junk data. You also need to sort by final height, and have 2 sets of data so you have male vs female. And possinbly a third set for infertile/intersex
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:28:56 PM No.76314416
>>76314230 (OP) >How does /fit/ respond to this data? by asking for the source of this data
>>76314230 (OP) Being poor usually causes more health issues. Richer people eat a lot more but are also more inclined to be alcoholics or pharma addicted as their poor counter types. 24-29 is probably where the ultra rich average out about
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:44:51 PM No.76314467
>>76314433 21 is normal bmi, 26 is overweight you retarded monkey.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:09:18 PM No.76314543
>>76314230 (OP) Can’t just look at # of years. There’s also quality of years. There’s a lot of “plump” old people in assisted living who sit in a chair and watch TV for 14 hours a day. They can’t do anything else.