How does /fit/ respond to this data? - /fit/ (#76314230) [Archived: 654 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:04:50 PM No.76314230
1724639368219259
1724639368219259
md5: 955b1a5364c308e9c20f31b3f38a1ade🔍
Being plump is healthy.
Replies: >>76314237 >>76314242 >>76314292 >>76314299 >>76314416 >>76314456 >>76314543
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:07:24 PM No.76314237
>>76314230 (OP)
That's not what the chart says, you literal smooth brained gorilla nigger retard.
Replies: >>76314274
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:09:11 PM No.76314240
>21 = lose years
>26 = don't
Huh?
Replies: >>76314433 >>76315725
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:09:53 PM No.76314242
>>76314230 (OP)
Did you do any research or just choose to believe random charts that support your theories and beliefs?
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:11:15 PM No.76314247
Nobody should have a BMI above 22.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:28:10 PM No.76314270
people with fatal diseases such as cancer often lose weight and BMI
this skews the data
Replies: >>76314307
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:29:36 PM No.76314274
>>76314237
it literally is
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:40:57 PM No.76314292
>>76314230 (OP)
Just don't go over 35.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:45:28 PM No.76314299
>>76314230 (OP)
It's junk data, way too many confounders.
Replies: >>76314301 >>76314333
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:46:59 PM No.76314301
>>76314299
Looks like a pretty smooth gradation.
I don't think there's that many factors influencing it.
Replies: >>76314333 >>76314803
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:50:29 PM No.76314307
>>76314270
yes. you see. actually. uhh. on the left hand side of the uhhh graph. the people with a BMI of of... less than uhhh 26. died of cancer.
as you can see. cancer is a BIGGER problem then you thought!
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:58:06 PM No.76314333
questionablepdfgrab
questionablepdfgrab
md5: fc46229f73d7cf62b8fff4ee38831c15🔍
>>76314299
>>76314301
Its just junk data.
You also need to sort by final height, and have 2 sets of data so you have male vs female. And possinbly a third set for infertile/intersex
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:28:56 PM No.76314416
>>76314230 (OP)
>How does /fit/ respond to this data?
by asking for the source of this data
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:33:19 PM No.76314433
>>76314240
Being underweight is bad for you

Fucking morons itt
Replies: >>76314451 >>76314467 >>76314546
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:39:55 PM No.76314451
>>76314433
that's not underweight
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:41:47 PM No.76314456
>>76314230 (OP)
Being poor usually causes more health issues.
Richer people eat a lot more but are also more inclined to be alcoholics or pharma addicted as their poor counter types.
24-29 is probably where the ultra rich average out about
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:44:51 PM No.76314467
>>76314433
21 is normal bmi, 26 is overweight you retarded monkey.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:09:18 PM No.76314543
>>76314230 (OP)
Can’t just look at # of years. There’s also quality of years. There’s a lot of “plump” old people in assisted living who sit in a chair and watch TV for 14 hours a day. They can’t do anything else.
Replies: >>76314545
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:09:57 PM No.76314545
>>76314543
Their skinny counterparts are dead.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:10:33 PM No.76314546
>>76314433
dumb fat retard eat less
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 8:34:43 PM No.76314803
>>76314301
>Looks like a pretty smooth gradation.
Which should tip you off that it's fake.
Replies: >>76315061
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 9:52:16 PM No.76315061
>>76314803
It's just the central limit theorem in action.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 1:12:03 AM No.76315512
1450188078583
1450188078583
md5: 7a66d84cfce984a79a2d609ec9b04924🔍
>BMI
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 2:22:35 AM No.76315725
>>76314240
Terminally ill people lose weight before dying.