>>76322848I mean are you retarded or do you just not get it? it's the exact same reason why men don't box women. there is a clear and obvious competitive advantage to being taller, to being more muscular, to having a longer wingspan. it's meant to be a reflection of skills as a fighter not who is simply the "best" fighter in terms of purely who could win the most possible fights. therefore they separate boxing, ufc, mma, other martial arts, even stuff like some competitive weightlifting etc into weight categories so you don't have say, tom aspinall fighting valentina shevchenko. those two fighting wouldn't be a test of skills as a fighter because the much heavier, much taller, much more muscular, longer wingspan man would obviously maul the smaller woman in the ring. the fact that some retarded OP is doing some manlet coping bait thread doesn't actually mean that fighting is retarded, and even then fighters that are "identical, same size, same height, same weight" as you mention don't actually have some projected 50/50 chance because actual skills as a fighter and intangible shit like will to win and even luck (ie good scores from the ring jannies aka referees) has a factor in separating those physically similar fighters. the smaller fighters are very obviously good at actual fighting