The tweet that exposed /fit/

>>76341467 (OP)
maingain bros...why do we just keep winning?

>>76341467 (OP)
>twitter screenshot
Sigh

>>76341505
>sigh
yikes

>>76341467 (OP)
How else are you going to make gains?

>>76341630
>you can't make gains unless you overeat beyond reason
Stupid dude. The fact that you're putting on fat shows that your body isn't using those calories for fuck-all.

>>76341627
>Yikes
Cringe

eh bulking is not bad it's not for everyone just like everything in life

>>76341627
Take my upvote

>>76341633
Post body right now.

>>76341627
People like you give me the ick

>>76341723
so true

>>76341630
By eating enough. More than enough is.. more than enough.

>>76341633
i know it's hard for autists to understand but you can just eat at a slight caloric surplus of like 200-400 calories

>>76342122
Hitting an exact 200 calorie surplus is difficult. You will likely bounce between caloric deficit and surplus. That's why a 500 calorie surplus is recommended as it has enough margin that if you accidentally undershoot it, you'll still probably be in a surplus.

>>76342132
yeah I was just trying to say that you don't have to go full lee priest pig mode to put on size

>>76342132
Is it? Am I just a genius? It seems pretty easy to me to look at how much I spend on groceries plus feel the hunger when I underdo and the discomfort when I overdo it.

>>76341635
>Cringe
based

>>76342180
> It seems pretty easy to me to look at how much I spend on groceries plus feel the hunger when I underdo and the discomfort when I overdo it
None of that shows how much actual calories you are eating versus burning.

>>76341467 (OP)
if I wanted to use twitter I'd go to twitter

>>76342307
No it definitely directly reflects it. It may not show it numerically and formatted for you to plug into an app but it's still all there.

>>76342360
I also don't track my calories, because I've been doing this a while. But I also know I don't exactly know how many calories I'm eating. It works alright. It'd be more efficient if I tracked my calories.

>>76341467 (OP)
Nobody over age 20 reads lookism, except me. That's probably a dumbass kid from southeast asia who should be ignored

>>76342425
NPCFlix made it into an anime. i watch it yesterday

>>76341505
It's not Twitter anymore.

"bro don't bulk just eat at a maintenance and maingain, I've been on it for 2 years, works for me"

>>76344123
he has abs

>>76344141
You need to be above 18 years of age to post on this site

>>76344154
you don't have abs

>>76341633
>overeat beyond reason
Eating more than your caloric maintenance requirement is a bulk. For some reason, you think that it only counts as bulking if you're pounding down a gallon of whole milk and eating 1000 calories+ over your maintenance

You're gonna need to bulk at some point if you're a DYEL, unless you just want to spin your wheels in the mud for years and years like all the other perma-DYELs you see in the gym day in and day out.

>>76341467 (OP)
No I mean to help. You HAVE to bulk at some point and get up to your man weight. Fill your frame out. Otherwise you just won't get there. It's only when you've EXCEEDED your frame that you start to get fat.

>>76344183
There's a fat retard in /plg/ whose abdominals and obliques show separation at 25%+ bf. Having tiny abs while auswitch mode only makes sense if your goal is to be sleek and firm for your bf

>>76345325
>for your bf
I am not gay tho

>>76341467 (OP)
Retards can't think long term and fail to understand that a bulk and being high bodyfat is a temporary strategy to build more muscle in the long term, and that you will look better than you did before after you cut. The truth is that it's a tradeoff to look worse in the short term, to look better in the long term

>>76342180
All calorie labels and formulas are estimates. You can’t track daily cico with +/- 100 calorie precision.

>>76342217
>based
Red-pilled

>>76342132
>hitting a surplus is difficult
Not in the era where you have watches that give you a very good idea of how many calories you’re burning and apps that can let you track food intake very precisely.

>>76345681
Your entire post is wrong.
Watches are way off.
Food labels are estimates.
Also learn to read please.

I'm maingainmaxxing and I been killing it