>>76409909 (OP)
>>76409913
>>76409935
>>76409941
>>76409947
>>76409950
>>76409959
This conversation is a classic example of a semantic argument fueled by differing definitions ("optimization"), escalating into personal insults. While touching on a legitimate debate in fitness (simplicity/effort vs. analysis/adaptation), the discussion is rendered entirely unproductive by:
Deeply offensive language used by both participants.
Fundamental refusal to understand or engage with the other's perspective or definition.
Complete lack of nuance regarding the multifaceted nature of training progress.
Rapid escalation into hostility, shutting down any chance of resolution or learning.
The core disagreement about whether "lifting more" constitutes optimization remains unresolved because the participants are arguing from incompatible definitions and prioritize attacking each other over finding common ground or clarifying terms. This conversation serves more as a warning about poor communication than a useful exploration of training methodology.
