Thread 76817584

>tfw don't have body dysmorphia
>at 6'1 it took me years to realize 175 lbs is still actually quite big
Lean is law.
Friendly reminder that 185 lbs 10% bf looks worse than 175 lbs 10% bf because you have more total fat and your face card suffers.

>>76817584 (OP)
Are you actually quite lean? How long can you cut before its a lot of muscle loss? Im stuck doing a lighter bulk day once or twice a week to recomp and keep building muscle for that one day and its fuckin my gains yo i just wanna get back to bulking asap.

>>76817584 (OP)
>185 lbs 10% bf looks worse than 175 lbs 10% bf
That depends on height and distribution.

>>76817752
on the same person retard
hidden context you need a 100 IQ to grasp

>>76817584 (OP)
If you're 6'0 or more anything less than 200 lbs is small

>>76817831
I don't care about your gay fantasies, anon.

>>76817831
you are fat

>>76817834
You're small

Isn’t it a coincidence that the average American male is 5’9 yet every other fitizen is 6’1/6’3/6’4 etc

Y’all niggas cappin

>>76817584 (OP)
Don't worry sticcy. I'll still look better and fuller than you with less exercise, less the calories and less the weight
t.5'6

>>76818096
>implying this is still a burger board

>>76818525
>implying it’s not
Most of the fags here use imperial and that’s ours

>>76817584 (OP)
>Friendly reminder that 185 lbs 10% bf looks worse than 175 lbs 10% bf because you have more total fat and your face card suffers.
Oh Christ, another fucking retard who watched that Aesthetics Waiting video (obviously I did too) and doesn't have grade school common sense.

>>76818528
I use imperials to blend in with you fags.

>>76817821
no he's right, retard. its possible that they will not store any extra fat on the face depending on genetics.

>>76817831
Fatass

>>76817584 (OP)
>at 6'1 it took me years to realize 175 lbs is still actually quite big
Is it? I'm 6'2 and about that weight or a bit heavier but look like lanky kong- my chest and back look okay but my limbs are long as fuck and so always look thinnish (unless I became obese which I don't want to do).
Obviously depends on your build/genetics though.

>>76817584 (OP)

Used to be 6'1 and 175 in high school, metabolism slowed and was 185 by end of college 190 by 25, these days I hover at 205. So speaking from experience you are total victim weight at 175, your lifts are likely suffering because of your weight and you are likely not very intimidating. Look at like the NHL or Marvel heroes all of them are above 6 feet and at least 190. Personally id say 185 closer to 190, is big enough size wise and as long as you stay below 15% bf you're fine face bloat wise. Anything 200 and above though you do start to get fat face though speaking from experience even at low bf.

>>76817584 (OP)
>185 lbs 10% bf looks worse than 175 lbs 10% bf because you have more total fat
>gain 1lb of fat and multiple pounds of muscle
>somehow look worse
By your logic auschwitz mode is the best look because you have the lowest amount of fat

>>76819182
>metabolism slowed and was 185 by end of college
Your metabolism didn’t slow. You ate worse and/or exercised less

>>76817604
I just let the cut days drag on, any big meal is a major workout etc its pretty easy if you have a lot of muscle you kinda wanna fast cut so you can get back to being on the bulk. A ton of vegetables is how to add 200-300cals a day without needing 2 800cal meals just keep nutrients high.

being obsessed about these bizarre 8-12% bf levels is ridiculously counterproductive if you don't live in cali or australia or/and are a fitness influencer
being 10% with some muscle means adhering to a strict diet 365 days a year if you're a natty (I'm talking actual 10%, too many retards with faint abs think they're practically at negative bf%)
if your goal is being hot then most women prefer larger men, their ideal median bf% for ideal men irl would be probably above 15%
if any younger guys are reading this - if you live in a country with 4 seasons, don't get too obsessed with super low bf%, stay relatively lean, don't pig out, maybe cut for summer, but getting shredded is usually not worth it (getting too fat on a bulk is even worse though)

>>76818096
The posters here are often white, not Indians, Chinks, and Spics pulling down the average.

Being 5'9 is a curse. If you're fat (+200) at 5'9 you're a pudgy circus clown shape. If you're stocky and muscular (+200) at 5'9 you're a manlet and if you're (-200) at 5'9 you run the risk of looking like a weakling. I'm 5'9 and I looked the best in college when I was a lean 165lbs, however at that weight and height you have to be careful not to get mogged by towering meat heads.

>>76820754
Lol maybe the first part is true but there’s a shit ton of Indians on the board post covid

>>76820788
Saar this is not true, delete this you bloody benchod

>>76819182
Why would anyone listen to a ham planet like yourself?

>>76817584 (OP)
>"don't have body dysmorphia"
>literally obsessed with leanness
yeah, ok buddy

>at 6'1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bpiku-3K-Ko

>>76817584 (OP)
Lol cope. I'm 180 lbs lean at 5'8" and still only visibly muscular in a shirt that's a size too tight. Either I'm superhero jacked, or you are not big by any means.

>>76819267

No my metabolism changed which actually caused me to eat less after that, as for excercise I already lift 80 minutes 5 to 6 days a week so there was nothing to change there.

Nice arm chair doctoring though, I bet you often make assumptions with little to no fact. Has anyone ever told you. When you assume, you end up a cunt just like your disgusting mother.

>>76820790

Well id guarantee this ham planet is not only stronger than you, but that I look better too as i said i gained weight in my face not my body. Let me guess sweety you can't gain weight without your skinny fat tits getting bigger? Only one way to find out though, post body. If you do id be more than happy to compare torsos and mog you.

I didn’t realize how skewed normal perception of body mass is until I watched the Social Network and the winklevoss twins were trying to intimidate zuck and said something like “I’m 6’5” 220 and there’s two of me.” I mean isn’t that Usain Bolt? I could snap him like bane did to Batman.

>>76820993

For that height youre right that isn't a lot of mass, I think they were just saying in comparison to Eisemberg whose like 5'8 and 150.

It's funny how it changes over time. Like i used to look at Alan Ritchson on Blue Mountain State and thought that dude is a brick wall at 6'3 205, after his Jack Reacher Transformation though, you realize that 205 at lean muscle is almost twinkish.

>>76820908
>fatty unc cope

>>76817584 (OP)
So much heightcel spam ITT, yet nobody calls out OP on the claim of 10% bf.

>>76821266

Too afraid to post body

>panty boy cope.

>>76821278

10% bf at 175 is pretty feasible friend.

>>76817834
>>76819045
It would be funny if you got cancer IRL

>>76820754
>The posters here are often white, not Indians
..who's gonna tell him