>>105866603
You could make the argument that Cinnamon was "bloated" back in 2013 or whenever they forked it from GNOME 3. Back when "netbook" computers were still a thing, 128GB SSDs were common and 256GB SSDs were still expensive.
These days, if you're worried about the "bloat" of too many of their built-in convenient tools installed, you are probably focusing on the wrong things. Disk space of a few applications won't be a performance game-changer for you.
If you're worried about the performance of graphical effects, just turn them off (I use Cinnamon and I turn them off).
The most valid arguments against Cinnamon, I feel, are (1) you don't like the Windows 7-style desktop experience, (2) you need more complex multi-monitor DPI scaling than Cinnamon offers as an easy configuration, or (3) you really, really want to use Wayland. Those are all fine reasons to avoid Cinnamon. Otherwise, it's roughly the same as the other big three DEs of KDE, GNOME and COSMIC.