← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106500698

11 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106500698 [Report] >>106500734 >>106500750 >>106500767 >>106500770 >>106502892
Which way white man?
Anonymous No.106500716 [Report] >>106500738 >>106502892
pf
Anonymous No.106500734 [Report]
>>106500698 (OP)
>which way white man?
there is only one
Anonymous No.106500738 [Report]
>>106500716
fpbp
Anonymous No.106500750 [Report] >>106501249 >>106502892
>>106500698 (OP)
ufw
Anonymous No.106500767 [Report]
>>106500698 (OP)
who would use iptables over nf?
is this even a debate?
Anonymous No.106500770 [Report] >>106501143
>>106500698 (OP)
nftables is better, but I already know the syntax of iptables.

nftables is not unix tho.


I'm tired of tool replacement that forces a high learning curve, just because devs are "opinionated".
Anonymous No.106501143 [Report]
>>106500770
This. And nftables can be overkill for simple rulesets. The iptables rule converters sucked last I saw so rewriting is a human process. Just coexist.
Anonymous No.106501249 [Report] >>106501292
>>106500750
W-what's wrong? I just do
sudo ufw default deny incoming
sudo ufw default allow outgoing
sudo ufw allow https
Anonymous No.106501292 [Report]
>>106501249
there's nothing wrong with it, it's just retard proof
Anonymous No.106502892 [Report]
>>106500698 (OP)
>>106500716
>>106500750
>not firewalld
are you all unemployed?