4rchive
[
Home
] [
Feed
] [
Search
] [
Report
]
← Home
← Back to /g/
Thread 106500698
11 posts
8 images
/g/
◉
Open Gallery
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 12:50:48 PM
No.106500698
[Report]
>>106500734
>>106500750
>>106500767
>>106500770
>>106502892
Which way white man?
1700129342351.png
md5: 86e37696...
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 12:55:18 PM
No.106500716
[Report]
>>106500738
>>106502892
pf
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 12:58:00 PM
No.106500734
[Report]
1732062925497133.jpg
md5: cf168e14...
>>106500698 (OP)
>which way white man?
there is only one
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 12:59:00 PM
No.106500738
[Report]
>>106500716
fpbp
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 1:02:02 PM
No.106500750
[Report]
>>106501249
>>106502892
1504918416508.jpg
md5: 0c0959b7...
>>106500698 (OP)
ufw
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 1:06:15 PM
No.106500767
[Report]
>>106500698 (OP)
who would use iptables over nf?
is this even a debate?
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 1:06:32 PM
No.106500770
[Report]
>>106501143
noaivsai.jpg
md5: f16e6162...
>>106500698 (OP)
nftables is better, but I already know the syntax of iptables.
nftables is not unix tho.
I'm tired of tool replacement that forces a high learning curve, just because devs are "opinionated".
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 2:12:40 PM
No.106501143
[Report]
>>106500770
This. And nftables can be overkill for simple rulesets. The iptables rule converters sucked last I saw so rewriting is a human process. Just coexist.
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 2:29:10 PM
No.106501249
[Report]
>>106501292
>>106500750
W-what's wrong? I just do
sudo ufw default deny incoming
sudo ufw default allow outgoing
sudo ufw allow https
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 2:36:18 PM
No.106501292
[Report]
>>106501249
there's nothing wrong with it, it's just retard proof
Anonymous
9/6/2025, 5:58:18 PM
No.106502892
[Report]
>>106500698 (OP)
>>106500716
>>106500750
>not firewalld
are you all unemployed?
Close ×
<
>