Thread 106523617

i pay 120 dollars a month for this

and i still doink you crossmap at 100 ping using a $40 mobile hotspot

>>106523624
i retired from gaming, but i was top fragging at 130 ping back when my internet was 90s teir broadband

>>106523617 (OP)
I pay $20 for this.

>>106523617 (OP)
$150 + tax

>>106523659
that's crazy cheap

I pay $85 for this

>>106523659
>$20/month
>Chile
It's not worth it unless you're Chilean.

op here i decided to switch to a cheaper plan. 85 dollars a month

>>106524194
I pay $81 for this

>>106524245
different ISP I assume?

Comcast isn't known for their fiber.


>>106524251
Before or after taxes/fees?

>>106524259
That's including 20% VAT (£60 GBP)

35€ for this.

>>106524259
>different ISP I assume?
yes i just got it installed. the speed isn't even the best part for me. comcast is jewish with their 1.2tb monthly bandwidth limit which i was overdrafting every month. this new isp seems based. no limits, and they even have no rules against self-hosting websites

>>106524298
>comcast is jewish with their 1.2tb monthly bandwidth
That limit doesn't even exist here, Comcast only implemented that in areas where they had a monopoly. In my area where they've been competing with Verizon for ~15-20 years they never introduced a data limit.

>>106524279
Not bad, I'm a dual citizen and have been debating moving to the UK, but the internet availability outside of london has been shit for years which kept me from seriously considering a move.

>>106524314
>but the internet availability outside of london has been shit for years which kept me from seriously considering a move.
Rural Yorkshire gets 10Gb. My area in England just launched 5Gb

>>106524327
Honestly my current job is 90% work from home, if i can get them to let me do 100% work from home, and be okay with the time zone difference, I can likely afford the move.

>>106524336
All I'd say is keep an eye on the news on 13th September. There's going to be some huge marches against the gov

>>106524314
>Comcast only implemented that in areas where they had a monopoly
yeah probably. they were too slow to put fiber down so looks like the new ISP will slowly squeeze them out

6.82$ a month

>>106524343
I currently live just outside of washington DC, i'm used to marches against the government.

>>106524285
>8Gb service
>boxes limited to 2.5Gbps on Ethernet
lol

>>106524347
>yeah probably. they were too slow to put fiber down so looks like the new ISP will slowly squeeze them out
Yeah it was fairly obvious around me back when they implemented the data cap in some areas because for Virginia, they specifically made it so "southern Virginia" was data capped, but northern Virginia (where verizon had a large presence) didn't have any data caps.

So yeah, it was obvious they were only doing it for areas that had no other good options for internet.

>>106524376
It's my network card that's limited to 2.5GB/s. The router supports 10GB/s ethernet.

>>106524397
no it doesn't, it has 1 10Gb SFP port for LAN.
why do you lie, frog?

>>106524383
apparently they are removing it? https://www.pcmag.com/news/comcasts-new-plans-dump-the-data-caps they already had plans that included unlimited data if you rented their routers. i don't know if this is any different

>>106524429
>>106524397
I mean, if you only have a single client device a single 10Gb SFP+ is fine.

And a 10Gbps switch isn't TOO bad if you needed more ports.

>>106524448
Wouldn't shock me, either remove it or increase the limit to ~10TB or something.

I've been averaging 15-20TB/month ever since I got 2gig service.

>>106524429
They give a 10GB/s adaptor on demand that you plug in the SFP port to get 10GB/s ethernet. You could just plug a switch to it that can do 10GB/s on all its ethernet ports.

>>106524481
I mean, SFP+ to 10GbE modules are like $20-60 depending if they're name brand or chinkshit.

So not really a big surprise.

If you're paying more than a dollar per gigabit, you're getting ripped off.

>>106524191
OWO!!! nummy nummy me want!

is it normal for this modem thingy to say it has a 10 gig connection even though my internet plan is only 1 gig? i dont think i have an ethernet cable that can go faster than 1 gig so i cant test if it actually goes that high

>>106524626
do you cancel your plan each time you reach 30 days?

>>106524671
That's likely just the link rate negotiated between your ONT (modem) and the ISP OLT.

Has nothing to do with the speeds you pay for.

My ONT also does this even though I only pay for 2gbps.

>>106523617 (OP)
They robbing you, fäm

>>106524746
how do i hack the system to make it match the link speed?

>>106524812
That IS the link speed.

It's linked to the OLT at 10gbps, your service is only 1Gbps, which is why you see that.

If the ONT allows you to specifically set the WAN link speed to 1gbps you could probably do that, but it would be pointless.

>>106524822
no i mean to hack my internet plan

>>106524626
i love when amerimutts with 2010 tier speeds larp as if they're from first world countries

>>106524871
Lol no

The OLT is likely authenticating through the ONT and your ONT is tied to your ISP's speed tier, and it's all handled on the ISPs side of things, so even if you told your ONT to somehow ask for 10gbps, the OLT still wouldn't give it to you.

I pay $190/mo for the PRIVILEGE of getting this (and no cap). I unironically am seriously happy with this compared to the $150/mo+overages+tip for sub 200/5 capped shit I was *forced because of monopoly coverage* to pay Comcast when I lived in Oregon's capital city.

Realistically this is closer to like ~300/11 with ~200 ping when connecting to a server down south. But its still so much better than Comcast god I fucking hate Comcast and fucking hate the monopolies they lobby to enable

$30/month Verizon FiOS in jew york.
It's 55 70 90 for 500mb 1gb and 2gb respectively but I don't think it's worth it.

>>106524881
it really sucks to see how little its changed. like this is "top tier" cable here and like i said in the last thread a fiber company is advertising 300mbps as an upgrade. it actually made me angry.
ignore the portland part im actually 300 miles away from there.

>>106524981
sad. they gave me a 10 gig modem but 1 gig is the highest internet plan. anyways, this thing seems to have its own dhcp server which puts my router onto a new address and i dont like it. does switching the modem to bridge mode fix it so the router is the main server now?

I pay $35/month for this. 2TB data used this month, they don't care

>>106525212
>2TB
that's kind low, that's like 20 games

>>106524298
they just removed that in my area once they upgraded all the lines here. now we get 200+mbps upload and 2gbps down 0 limits. definiitely still shit tier but im not longer concerned about my bandwidth limits

>>106525043
>1000/10
>not even 1000/100
cuckold.

>>106525323
>I don't understand how overhead works
G
M
S

Best I can get where I live is 2Gbps for $75/month, unlimited.

I fucking hate comcast. I jumped ship to fiber as soon as it was available. They are still doing sketchy shit like they are currently running a promo where 1 gig internet (and 40mb up kek) and a included mobile line is $65/month for 5 years and after 5 years it jumps to $110. Fuck comcast, they'll get their comeuppance soon.

>>106525323
If they actually had fiber and it wasn't just a marketing lie that they offer it, I'd switch in a heartbeat

>>106525331
what the fuck are you talking about retard nigger?
overhead has nothing to do with being cucked into upload speed being 1% of download

The best internet for my area (single family home) is 8 Gigabits for $165/month

>>106525363
even on fttc docsis or gfast theres no excuse for 100:1 ratio like that though

i thought we were cucked enough with 10:1 on actual real fttp from major isps (holdover from docsis/gfast)

>>106525043
pretty good considering you live in a wasteland

testing only to nearest major city is basically worthless
I pay £22/month ($30 USD) with static ipv4 and no ipv6.

All of you faggots complaining meanwhile whatever the Orange plan for 4 sim cards (one with a 931gb cap) costs gives me this on a desktop USB modem.

>>106525636
there are posters on here that have a sub 1mbps connection

>>106525550
which is why i tested to London, which is over 100 miles away: >>106524251

>>106523617 (OP)
If you spend your money on things you want, it's not a waste. Good for you OP, enjoy your purchase (not even being sarcastic).

>>106526485
Unironically this

>>106526463
wow! 100 miles to the major capital city where your isps backhaul probably goes
good job!

>>106526967
>sir your backhaul go to competing ISP ok saar does not count
>tests to Europe
>tests to east coast of US
>hides his provider
Doesn't count sorry, that's your ISPs backhaul.
I also see here that you're using Ookla, sorry, ISPs detect this and increase your speeds.
Come back when you have a real speedtest, okay?

>>106523617 (OP)
i pay 6.5€ for this
5G, no data cap, but throttled to 300Mbps

>>106527252
you have literally no idea what you are talking about
retard

>>106527577
I purposely made that post using a series of hyperboles to show how retarded your post was.
Also, no speed test that isn't from locations convenient for you. How very strange. I wonder if it is because you can barely scrape 20Mbps LMAO

>>106527662
i dont have to prove anything to you
i purposefully picked major datacentre clusters in mainland europe and usa
i get 80% of what I pay for transatlantic

the point was all the turd worlders with $5 gigabit have it drop to sub-10mbps when it goes outside of their shithole countries.

>>106523617 (OP)
im so glad to be off of spectrum coax now
they are a menace and arbitrarily limit uploadf to 40Mbps

>>106527886
>arbitrarily
i mean, they're DOCSIS aren't they?

It's not arbitrary.

>>106527892
if they can do 1Gbps down why can't DOCSIS 3.1 do the same up?
not that I'm well versed in coax shitter cables or protocols

>>106527902
Because they're running "low split" DOCSIS 3.1 which only gives 5-42MHz to the upload side, which equates to ~30-40mbps.

DOCSIS 3.1 also supports "mid split" deployments which use 5-85MHz for the upload offering around 100-200mbps (depends on the distance from the ISP equipment.)

And finally there is "high split" DOCSIS 3.1 which is 5-204MHz which can do 200-350mbps upload.

It's only relatively recently DOCSIS ISPs in the US are upgrading to mid and high split deployments on a wide scale.

Comcast in my area has upgraded to high split DOCSIS 3.1 and offer 2300mbps download with 330mbps upload.

>>106527948
still jewish tier of them to charge $120/mo for 40Mbps up in my eyes when Fiber is right around them in every other area offering higher symmetric speeds at lower prices
they kept promising a public rollout of 10Gbps infrastructure (prob 1Gbps upload max lmao) for years now but I'm just glad to be rid of them and their shitty monthly rising price that isn't justified
pretty sure that upgrade was going to just be "high split" as you mentioned so even worse than what I assumed and doesn't matchw hat I saw for the DOCSIS 3.1 standard maximum either yeesh

>>106527840
>I don't have to prove anything to you.
That's fine, I can just make a series of assumptions and you will be unable to disprove them.
You are brown; Indian or Pakistani.
You favourite food is lamb biryani.
You are convicted of sexual assault on a girl aged 8-13.
You have a poverty internet connection.
Your shitty connection drops into the Kbps without cherry picked locations beneficial to you.
You don't and are unable to "prove" that any of this is false by your own admission.

Cope.

bump

>>106528106
kinda spooky how accurate this is ngl

>>106528106
based

>>106525232
>games
You will immediately cease and not continue to access the site if you are under the age of 18.

>> You are brown; Indian or Pakistani.
>> You favourite food is lamb biryani.
>> You are convicted of sexual assault on a girl aged 8-13.
>> You have a poverty internet connection.
>> Your shitty connection drops into the Kbps without cherry picked locations beneficial to you.
>> You don't and are unable to "prove" that any of this is false by your own admission.

And you know what? Everything you have you said is true ( expect the biryani part ) and proud of that and you can’t do shit

Now cry about it.

>>106529533
based saar

>>106529533
Cringe

>>106529533
Biryani saars….we lost

>>106524194
I'm paying $60/month for the same.

>>106528106
trvthnvke from orbit

>>106527902
>>106527886
I can't be fucked to go beyond 2gig for now, 8gig service seems decent on paper, but the expense I'd need to shell out to upgrade my LAN just doesn't make sense right now.

In a few years when NICs, switches, and routers are more readily available I might upgrade.

>>106534156
>but the expense I'd need to shell out to upgrade my LAN just doesn't make sense right now.
yes this is something that most people don't seem to realize. i doubt a lot of people with very fast internet even have the hardware to use it

>>106534734
I mean, some people just have a single primary computer hooked up at full speeds, and then everything else on the network is still on older 1GbE.

why would you need 8 gig internet unless you are running a data center out of your house?

americans be like: yeah ill pay $600 + $13,49 tax + $20 tip for 5mbps/1mbps thank you

>>106535550
I'm american >>106524194

>>106535868
ashburn more like assburn

>>106535970
Ashburn is home of the largest data center cluster in the world in what is known as "data center alley"

> The region has over 300 data centers, which is more than the next six largest U.S. markets combined.

so what stops companies from giving higher speeds? 1gig is common common here but I never see any offering more than that, can I just call the isp and say "hey I want 10gig to download/upload loads of porn" and they offer a custom plan for it?

>>106536280
ISP infrastructure is generally the determining factor.

Anything beyond 1gig is fairly new and expensive, and if your ISP COULD offer beyond 1gbps, they likely would, even if only some $150+/month plan for the rich morons to get.

>>106524881
It seems the only decent options here are independent fiber companies in Bumfuck Nowhere offering 8-10 up/down. But if you live anywhere that isn't a wasteland, it's 2.5 max on copper if you're extremely lucky, most get less than 300.

>>106537318
Who exactly do you think is "doxing" people here?

Your government already knows everything you're posting, your ISP knows the same, and no one on 4chan is going to somehow connect your speedtest result to any individual person.

Anyone calling a speedtest thread a "doxxing" thread is just plain retarded or schizophrenic.

I'm not reading all that

@106537382
Here, you forgot this.

...

>>106523617 (OP)

Well, your upload speed is really good, but your ping is shit. I don't understand that...

Why does anyone here need more than 10 mbit? You don't have and teen kids streaming all at the same time and even if you run a home server you will neve ever get bottlenecked

>>106537800
AI models and games are very large you know

>>106525344
Healthy competitive free-market A-Grade capitalism.

I pay 3$ a month for this

>>106538056
>saartel offers better services than murican ISPs
it's over

>>106538243
Of course they do, it's how 90% of their population accesses the internet.

Whereas in the US most people have wifi either at home, at work, or in most public spaces.

>>106538045
Regulations are for woke pussies

>>106537800
>xe doesn't download all his shit super fast so he can get on with work

>>106525323
>Lol cuck just upend your entire life and move just to get better internet halfway across the country somewhere
Underageb&
I'm not saying I support this monopolized oligarchical bullshit, but it's just the way things are and there not a damn thing anyone can do about it

>>106540306
I download shit quickly then tell my boss i'm still waiting on the download while i watch youtube/TV.

>>106523617 (OP)
Is that good? In australia ISPs charge around 60-80 aussie dollarydoos for around 100Mbps and it doesn't really get much faster for residential connections, unless you're in some supermodern flat in the middle of melbourne or sydney with FTTP. Internet infrastructure here is 20 years behind the rest of the world.

>>106523617 (OP)
i think its $30 or $50

>>106525331
serbian eurodocsis 3.0 24x8 does 1000/100
overhead just makes it 950/95
literal technology from 2006 in a fucking shithole country
no excuse

>>106523617 (OP)
im so thankful that ive had uninterrupted fios service for the last 20 years straight

>>106524314
>internet availability outside of london has been shit for years
varies a lot
I've had cable internet (in the 'burbs in Yorkshire) for a couple of decades, and it's pretty great, enough that I don't want to buy the highest speed, as I simply don't need the speed. I could get fibre, but the bottleneck's usually not my connection so why bother.
My brother had shit internet for years, but it's way better now they've run FTTC into his (actually rural) village.

>mfw 140aud a month for starlink
at least its 300-500mbit and decent upload 50mbit+

>>106523617 (OP)
I pay 50cad for 1.5gbps down+up
jesus christ canada used to be well known for its shockingly overpriced and underpowered internet what happened lmfao

>>106540429
>Is that good? In australia ISPs charge around 60-80 aussie dollarydoos for around 100Mbps and it doesn't really get much faster for residential connections, unless you're in some supermodern flat in the middle of melbourne or sydney with FTTP. Internet infrastructure here is 20 years behind the rest of the world.
i literally get faster speeds on starlink than fttp 1gbit i had in brisbane for the same fucking price
fucking disgusting!

>>106523659
$22 "700 symmetrical"

>>106540859
>at least its 300-500mbit
Only if you buy one of the expensive performance receivers, the Performance Gen3 is like $2000.

>>106523617 (OP)
$40 for this.

>>106540905
so what shithole country has infra this bad

>>106540938
USA

>>106540429
shitty expensive internet in first world country is always government regulations and monopolies

>>106523617 (OP)
When I bang your mom she lets me use the Wi-Fi for free.

>>106541170
based

>>106542197
Based 2gig bro

$22 in poorfag country (Thailand).

You Europeans just don't understand how expensive it is to push bandwidth through ULTRA PREMIUM AMERICAN GRADE COAXIAL. I'm privileged to spend this much for the convenience.
>"Why should we spend money to provide fiber optic to your neighborhood?" - The only ISP in my area, probably

>>106542534
Same price here in Brazil.

There has been some talk about getting fiber to the apartment complex, but I dont think I will see it anytime soon.

Page 10 bump

>>106543066
That ping sucks ass too.

>>106540938
turkey

>>106546243
My condolences

>>106540880
based and puertopilled

>>106546609
Thanks

>>106523617 (OP)
I've been paying $45/m for DSL hybrid, for the past 8 years now. You think you have it bad? I used to get between 15-20mbit/s down during the day and like 20-30+ during the night. This decreased every year. Now I am sitting between basically DSL speeds (3mbit/s) with *maybe* an extra 1-2mbit/s from the 4G during the day, and often I can't even exceed 8mbit/s during the night. I live in a rural area, I have direct line of sight to the tower, and despite better signal quality/power than back in the day, it's way worse now. I am suffering. 350-500KB/s download a lot of the time, while it's 2025 and games can be >100GB.
40/10, $45

>>106523617 (OP)
my neighbor's wifi

>>106546882
Based

>>106546881
Starlink is only 2-3x that with 50-100x faster speeds.

I pay $0 for this, not fast but it also makes NEETing easier.

>>106548475
I could get 300/300mbps for free my ISP, but I pay $60/month for 2000/2000mbps.

>>106546881
i remember having DLS even up to maybe 2018. i believe i waited a month for gta 5 to download, and got very disappointed every time i broke something when i modded games since it meant i had to wait for it all to re-download again. surprisingly, it was fast enough to play online games and voice call people even at that sub 3mbps speed. anyways, i agree with anon shilling starlink

>>106549747
>i remember having DLS
dylsexia?

>>106549769
KEK

>110mbit symmetrical 7§
>2gbit symmetrical 85€
>2gbit symmetrical 25€
Any chance to get something like that in germany?
The big telecom providers here charge like 90€ for 1Gbit down 100Mbit down.

>>106549970
*1Gbit down 100Mbit up

>>106540905
Canada. Cable. No fibre yet. Soon™.

>>106549970
>>2gbit symmetrical 85€
>>2gbit symmetrical 25€
Why so differently priced, does the other ISP just not care to compete?

>>106551824
the expensive one probably includes a bunch of extra stuff

40 cad. so about 30 usd or less.
hoping to get the same but cheaper this holidays.

>>106524194
holy hell what do you have?
I'm in Virginia too would love to get these speeds

i pay $0 for this

>>106551865
Verizon FiOS

>>106528106
OOF

>>106551868
free because you're poor or free because it's baked into your rent/building fees?

>>106552875
router?

>>106552891
TP-Link BE9300

>>106523617 (OP)
>>106524194
>>106524353
>>106527886
Excessive, anything above 250 mbps. You don't need that unless you're doing something shady.

>>106553090
I just enjoy downloading whatever it is i'm wanting as fast as I can.
And I can easily afford it, so why not?

>>106553106
Knew it, I. Thief.

>>106553142
I'm a thief for downloading video games i've paid for quickly?

>>106523617 (OP)
Normal in 2016 ish

>95 AUD a month
>paying for 100/20
>getting ~70/15 because crusty old copper and FTTN
foolishly optimistic for the Soontm FTTP upgrade

£40 a month, £10 of that is so I don't have to use CGNAT
Package is 900/100 - upload often goes higher. That's about the best download I get on wifi in this room

>>106523617 (OP)
My internet speed is often around 0.5-1.5 Kbps (note little b). But that's because I steal it from my neighbor lol

>>106555781
How poor are you?

>>106555289
>wifi
If you have coax in your walls, use MoCA.

>>106557755
I don't. I'm going to run some ethernet at some point, I just can't be bothered.

>>106523617 (OP)
21€ 1000/800mbps, it come with a landlinephone also so you can scream at people trying to scam you.

>>106557894
Nice, ethernet is best. MoCA is just a good alternative if you've already got Coax runs.

>>106523659
>>106524194

Dudes that is nuts. I am jelly.

>>106524314
>That limit doesn't even exist here, Comcast only implemented that in areas where they had a monopoly. In my area where they've been competing with Verizon for ~15-20 years they never introduced a data limit.

How extremely jewish.

>>106558524
It does feel good

can i safely unplug the fiber cable from the ONT? i want to configure the built in modem, but i have to directly plug into it and i don't have a firewall set up on my computer

>>106556311
Extremely

>>106558674
Depends on the fiber and how its terminated

if you break something it'll take a tech visit to come out and fix it, so be careful if you don't want to lose internet for potentially days or weeks.

>>106558812
so there's a bunch of different connectors, instead of a single standard like ethernet?

>>106558843
Not a bunch, but several.

XFP, SFP, single-mode/multi-mode LC/PC, and a handful of other potentials.

And if you've got a shitty installer who originally ran the fiber it could have poor quality splicing on the termination that makes it especially fragile.

>>106558937
alright, i'll just risk the virus then

>I suffer in wifi
Over 20 years of development and the entire wireless tech stack is still a total crock of shit.

>>106558948
And why the dick is upload consistently slower than download? It's the same fucking antenna.

>>106558959
I get the opposite problem, my upload is almost always higher than my download.

>>106523617 (OP)
> i have 120 dollars of disposable income
fuck off, rich bitch

>>106559023
internet access is an essential utility though

why are upload speeds so restricted sometimes?

>>106559300
If you're on a DOCSIS ISP then it's ISP infrastructure related, see >>106527948

>>106559315
Yeah we have DOCSIS but at the same time they have laid fibre around here and latency did go down a little. So why the upload still so cucked? They are obviously doing huge changes to their infrastructure.

>>106559329
They still need to update the DOCSIS equipment to support faster splits even if they've upgraded the backhaul connection to fiber.

>>106559344
I guess the internet will stay 'Neuland' for a while longer then.

>>106559368
download speed and latency are generally far more useful to the average consumer anyway, so you'll live i'm sure.

>>106523617 (OP)
americans are so cucked. I pay less than $20 for something similar in fucking south america. $20 would get me 1gb up/down here, I think.

>>106523659
>>106540880
based chileans

>>106558524
consider that we basically are at the other side of the world, so pings and some connections suck

>>106553090
least jealous comcast customer

>>106523617 (OP)
$65 leaf bux

>>106555289
>£10 for a static IP
what the fuck
get on Hyperoptic instead.

>>106523617 (OP)
dude most places spectrum is 50$ a month for 500mbps. how you maybe 120 for less than a gig. lol.

>>106561049
not available in my area
as far as I know, gofibre are the only altnet around here

100 leaf bucks a month

>>106564038
Could be worse

>>106561882
Because he's with comcast not spectrum

weird how different companies charge different prices for similar service in different market locations

>>106523617 (OP)
$20

>>106523659
hace como 3 años movistar era mas barato y mas rapido, sad

>>106523617 (OP)
$10
Yes it's comparatively slow, but you know what? It's plenty for everything I use it for.

>>106559032
My penis is an essential utility.

20 bucks, Switzerland, also unlimited phone national.

>>106523617 (OP)
5 years and I pay $0
thanks my neighbor! I hope you never get raided one day tho

>>106566441
Where are you, what service?
I pay $50 for not much better from Cox in Florida.

>>106570716
Xfinity Now Wifi, west coast. It's marketed towards anyone who needs a secondary internet connection away from home, hence the low price, but there's nothing stopping you using it as your primary connection at home.
The catch is it's wifi-based utilizing their open public wifi network, so you need to be close enough to one of their APs, and it's not a secure connection (at the wifi level). You're also limited to connecting just two devices at a time, although there's ways around that with a router and a litlte technical know-how. It also forces you to reconnect via a captive login page every month or so. If you're okay with the limitations, it's hard to beat the value.

>>106526967
>>106527840
bro, where's your test to Tokyo?
9000 miles too much for your pissant connection?
KEK

~18 eur a month.

Why does anyone need more that 150 or 300 (if your job depends on it)

>>106572431
superfast connections benefit everyone. Less network congestion.

>>106572431
I like to download large games faster than u.

>>106523617 (OP)
Finally got 4gbit fiber a while ago, feels good man

>>106523617 (OP)
I pay 79.- CHF for this (~100$US)

>>106573756
Hello Nidau in Biel

>>106573846
Huh. Does Quickline only have one node for their whole network or what? Yes, it is indeed in Biel. I thought this is just the closest to me.

>>106523617 (OP)
no cap
23.99€
I wish I had 8 in upload too, maybe in the near future

>>106573905
Yep

>started at 64 kbps
>even 50 mbps feels fast enough
them kids woth their newfangled technology

>>106573987
>50Mbps
damn, is it 2012?

>>106573987
I don't immediately notice the showdown until it's under 10M. Anything over 100Mb per person is well into diminishing returns, but I still get warm feelies having 1Gb symmetric.

>>106575707
>100Mb
>a 10GB download taking 13 minutes
That ain't diminishing returns, that's fucking slow.
400Mb/s is the slowest I will tolerate at home, and I mean tolerate. My guaranteed is 900Mbps, anything below that and they have to send an engineer out.
>I don't immediately notice the slowdown until it's under 10M
You just don't value your time, which is synonymous with the unemployed and the low-skilled.

>>106557894
just hide it behind furniture. idk why the failed normies of the tech world seethe so much about visible wires. literally just toss it behind furniture to hide it if it makes you seethe so bad

I pay 11€ for 200mbps in the balkans but its more like 180

>>106576177
-t unemployed mmo addict

My VDI works the same at just about any speed.

44,90€/mo

>>106524285
>TELEVERSEMENT
C'est quoi cette merde

>>106576730
wysi

>>106538243
jeets gotta scam every other country some how

>>106561882
i was on their "gig" plan which was 1gbps down 40mbps up for like $120/mo
when i left they tried to offer a sick deal for $50 or some shit when i was moving to fiber instead and dropping them for being a loyal customer for years
i laughed out loud

>>106576508
>MMO
you mean those games that you only need a 500kbps connection for?
Nice self-report.

>>106523624
I've seriously considered switching to one of those because the speed is double for half of what I pay. I've seen one in action in my BFE town and it's pretty damn fast.

>>106523659
You earn 1/20 of what an american does

>>106524259
>Before or after taxes/fees?
Only USA states prices for before taxes/fees, so you can always assume its after taxes/fees.

>>106577932
No longer true as of last year, but thanks for outing yourself.

>>106577836
>self-report
As what, employed? The only time I'm waiting on a >10GB download it's a game or pirate movie.

>>106578838
Wrong pic.

>>106578592
>AI-let nocoder talks about employment and download sizes
holy kek

>>106578947
>coding involves multiple 10+gb files updated constantly
>everyone who disagrees is ai
You've been upgraded to 400lb unemployed 'artist'

>>106578848
Too late, I've already booked my flight to Sarnia.

>>106523617 (OP)
$25 for 700 megs here in macaco land.

>>106579207
>>everyone who disagrees is ai
Hello Dikshit, I recommend you go back to Duolingo.
Yes, AI models, libraries and dependencies can be several hundred gigabytes. But keep projecting; I’m sure you’ll escape the slums someday.

>>106553090
i am doing something shady thanks for asking

>>106579566
AI models take forever to train and the vast majority of devs never self-host. The number of coders regularly moving data sets like that is too small to matter.

But you wouldn't know because you have no marketable skills and are literally too fat to leave the house.

>>106579313
Based

>>106523617 (OP)
The fastest upload speed offered near me is 35mbps. Fucking Spectrum!

>>106524353
Symmetry is beauty.

>>106524285
do you have 10gbe set up? current trend is 2.5gbe on motherboards so you may need a 10gbe ethernet card, cat 6q cabling in your house and if you use a router that needs 10gbe too. seems your bottlenecked somewhere

>>106523655
I was top 7 with a specific kit in BF2142 with >100ms ping and < 1 MB/s speed and some cheapy stock Microsoft mouse.

The world was different back then, it was all much more casual.

>>106581117
See >>106527948


They should be upgrading to mid or high splits soon for most areas in the US.

>>106525115
If you’re not bridging your modem, it’s probably doing all the routing itself anyway. Are you saying you have your own router and the modem’s DHCP is leasing it different addresses? If you just want to do intervlan with your router or something, you may have an option to reserve a specific IP thru the DHCP interface of the modem (probably a web interface). Or you could just bridge it, do all your routing with your personal router, and statically assign its IP. Bridging should disable any of the DHCP and routing functions of the ISP modem. Your router will be assigned the public IP on its WAN uplink.