>>106578813 (OP)
are there truly divergent linux distros? or does the difference between muh distributions in fact lie in
>package manager and software repo format
>init system
>used kernel
>how and against which library software's compiled against
>software installed and configured by default?
are there really any other differences between distros? if so one should discuss diversity of these particular things, not their distributions. the answer is, of course
>corpo takeover, is barely developed, experimental and thus unstable, very particular autistic usecase outside of which it's irrevalent, /pol/shizo protestware
and nothing which just werks. even fucking kernel has its moments. what fine diversity it is, to show such outstanding quality.
software engineering is fucking ill, anon. when you pick a linux distro, you pick a combination of bad choices. it doesnt matter which one you'll choose, they're all rife with retardation.