Thread 106636391

China just killed Hollywood with a new open source AI: https://x.com/nearcyan/status/1968950444505412020?

>>106636391 (OP)
you can tell its AI though.

>>106636391 (OP)
Looks like crap and needs an original video to work off of so what's the point

>>106636391 (OP)
Finally I can use this to have no honkies on my screen.

wow it looks like shit
very good saars

>>106636391 (OP)
>freedom tools used to create circle jerks
sadly many such cases

>>106637006
>needs an original video to work off of so what's the point
you can pay a local theater kid (who isn't attractive enough) to do the work. and buy a 'face' license or create your own. anyone who doesn't think this isn't the future is dreaming. motion capture has been a thing for awhile, and is going to become even easier

>>106636391 (OP)
>copying the original
>obvious gen artifacts
>cherry-picked segment with simple movements

>>106636391 (OP)
was that tree resting on his shoulder? 0:24

implessive...

>>106637006
Replacing pocs with cracked haglined white womyn

>>106637304
>>copying the original
>>obvious gen artifacts
>>cherry-picked segment with simple movements
everything 'new' thing is underwhelming. a proof of concept that honestly looks pretty damn good. no way this doesn't end up being the way of things

>>106637006
>use case?

>take porn video
>paste anime over it
>glowies and normies are seething
>gooners now have ethical pornography and in finite amounts specifically tailored to their own personal tastes

lol lmao now you know why the jews are attacking 'pornography' so hard, they are about to be put completely out of business.

>>106637296
>you can pay homeless people to act out your script for peanuts then replace them with your branded character in post

the entire hollywood nepotism circle jerk is screaming out in pain right now

>>106637594
>the entire hollywood nepotism circle jerk is screaming out in pain right now
yeah, only way this doesn't just become the norm eventually is via legislation with big moneybags lobbying against it behind the scenes.
>cue Clooney to speak out against it soon

>>106637624
>>106637594
Acting requires verbal skills too fatties

>>106637624
That's going to look like such a strange thing to kids born today.

>there were humans who would train themselves to wiggle just so, because ai hadn't been invented yet

>>106637630
>local theater kid
>Acting requires verbal skills too fatties
yes it does. and it's rare for those great skills to belong to perfect 10s. which is why i look forward to this. some character actor who can nail it but isn't easy on the eyes will be able to knock it out of the park

>>106637700
heheheheh who's gonna tell him?

>>106636391 (OP)
I'm FAR more interested in how it looks plastered over 3D models at various stages of realism.
It looks very good plastered over IRL footage yes, but the true value and usecase lies in this level of fidelity coming from simpler models.

>>106637714
>heheheheh who's gonna tell him?
maybe being too optimistic..but i think it could elevate the artform. right now every 'leading man/women' needs to be both beautiful and talented. and we get stuck with Sweeneys and Keanus because they're so few and far between

>>106637773
:^) diffusion comes for audio as well.

>>106636391 (OP)
replace all the actresses of your favorite movies (and videos kek) wth lolis, thanks god emperor xi

>>106637006
Don't worry, mongoloids shilling this don't understand the difference between 360p compressed video versus 2048x1556 or more.

>>106637797
i heard wan is uncensored, ould something so wonderful be true?

Then fucking do it. Make a full ai movie and see how it does. ngl id love to see celebs get taken down a peg but fucking make a movie and see how it does before boasting about it

>>106637793
>:^) diffusion comes for audio as well.
>living on a rock for a set amount of time...give me the good flicks/music while im here.

>>106636960
>th-the hands...
artists are so dumb

>>106637797
whenever I watch a show or youtube video with a girl I always make nude videos, been doing it for a while now

>>106636391 (OP)
I'm sure some people will use it to replace every black actor with an AI generated white one, and there will be black-free versions of movies shared online.

>>106637584
Your post made me realize that pedos will use it to replace adult porn actresses with younger AI generated ones... Well, if it can keep them away from real kids, why not after all.

>>106636391 (OP)
>can't get lighting right
We're still good.

>>106638051
>>can't get lighting right
>We're still good.

>secures tinfoil...maybe they've been preparing us?

>>106637296
>>106637594
Except that the celebrity is part of the hollywood machine. They tried the digital actor bit and it failed.

>>106637918
but can you do what anon suggested? asking for a friend

Heh, we can now fix movies and swap minorities?

>>106638237
a celebrity who uses a different body than their own could be a hit. Look at vtubers and extrapolate.

>>106638237
>They tried the digital actor bit and it failed.
they tried with Voodoo 3dfx tier graphics. they'll try again and it'll succeed. and in the interim they'll focus more on the deaging until it's not uncanny feeling and hopefully we'll get some kino

>>106636391 (OP)
Yeah, that's what I wanted in my tv and films. Literally uncanny valley in every scene and every motion. Sounds and music are also going to become uncanny too.
I'm ready to never watch anything past 2010 ever again in my life.

bring it on. kids these days cant write or act, so it can't be any worse than modern tv.

>>106636960
>>106637006
This is the worst it will ever be.

>>106637624
The more they regulate themselves, the more the competition from other nations will sweep them away from the spotlight.

>>106637630
>>106638237
Vidya and movie animation studios have very iconic characters and in 99% of cases is no celebrity to praise. Actors and actresses' fame is directly tied to the success of the movie. A fictional character does not ask for a paycheck and is literally owned by the production company.

>>106638586
>the more the competition from other nations will sweep them away from the spotlight.
that's a recent development. in the past 'hollywood' hasn't given a shit about what other countries do/buy. Not saying you're wrong, just that they'll most likely be set in their ways and slow to learn

>0 emotions from the AI
are the chinks ever trying or are they all souless demons?

>>106638242
yeah, it's possible but the way I'm doing it has them morph into a loli as part of it rather than replacing them from the beginning, I guess I could just edit out the morphing part though

>>106637006
>what's the point

>>106638827
All my this and a 1997 George Lucas Rolling Stone article where he said in the near future you'll only need an actor's image, the rest will be handled by Super Computers.
They had the means, the hardware, but the how came about almost 30 years later. He shot the prequels with the idea that soon he'd be able to alter everything he had filmed. Poor Guy is literally too naive for this world.

>>106638237
Funny you pick that movie which started a CGI revolution that was finally starting to be able to get human skin right. The tech was refined more in the Last Flight of the Osiris in the Animatrix.

>>106636391 (OP)
When I was a kid I imagined that CGI would be so good in the future that actors wouldn't be required any more. I guess I was wrong but this is the closest thing to that.

>>106639197
I guess we thought there would still be computer animators doing the work, not AI on its way to replace all those jobs...lol

>>106639235
CGI Artists Can Now Focus Upon Higher-Level Creativity
>aka, promptjockey, or starve.

>>106639271
Screen writers will do the prompting.

>>106637624
animators already tried to constrain ai and failed. the studios went hard against them
studios will do it again to actors. if they dont have to pay chris pratt $15million a role, thats more coke for the execs

>>106639290
Yeah, that's the logical endgame.
But afaik there's still a lot of manual intervention when AI fucks up, no matter how many variations of a prompt are tried.

>>106636391 (OP)
FINALLY a solution to the nigger problem in movies, now we can just edit them out
>>106636960
>tech will NEVER improve
loving to see retards be proven wrong time and time again as ai tools get better. they are incapable of looking ahead and to the past and seeing tools improve and seeing the state of what the used to be

How retarded do you have to be to think any of this is real? Apparently, really fucking retarded judging by the replies.

>>106638347
It's not about "them"

You know how you can slop stories with llm? slop a whole movie. In some time, idk how long, you'll be able to one shot a feature length film.

>>106639367
It doesn't have to look real. It just has to get rid of those honkies.

>>106636960
No one will care.

>>106637304
I legit don't understand how midwits STILL don't understand that technology will never stop improving. Nitpicking flaws in the newest iteration of this type of technology just makes you look like a complete fucking retard. This is leaps and bounds ahead of what we had even a few years ago and a few years from now, it will have progressed even more.

Or do you honestly believe that this is it, that we've reached the end of technological progress and this is as good as it will ever be?

>>106639355
But ai is still always recognizable as ai. It really hasn't improved that much.

>>106638632
Emotions keep us from perfection.

>>106639367
wait, you're telling me that my marvel slop isn't real!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEYmS26Gar4&t=9s

>>106639449
The tech will 'improve' but it's still about creativity. >>106639412 won't work because computers don't do creativity, EOD.

>>106636391 (OP)
>open source AI
Why so antisemitic?

>>106639450
>It really hasn't improved that much.
A few years ago, the pinnacle of AI video was Will Smith eating spaghetti.

>>106639344
Soon it will be perfected. After all screenwriters are basically prompting people already, so the job is similar to prompt AI. Also I'm sure they can even train an AI on what screenwriters wrote vs the final movie to make a specialized one just for this purpose.

>>106636391 (OP)
"blockbuster" films will be sold for $0.10 / view
"movie stars" will disappear
Las Angeles will become even worse.

Can't wait, anon.

>>106636391 (OP)
Are you implying Hollywood won't use this?

>>106636391 (OP)
Source of video instead of shitty X link
https://humanaigc.github.io/wan-animate/

>>106639635
>"blockbuster" films will be sold for $0.10 / view
tbf, if you can write your ending, everytime, it's worth way more than 10c. But at some point you may as well cut out the middleman then (studio).

>>106636391 (OP)
You still need famous people in movies because people like seeing famous people in movies. The difference is they just need to take their picture and get their check while the Ai does the acting and voice.
But the porn will be amazing.

>>106639520
It doesn't even have to be perfect. Have you seen those retarded "ai cat" short movies on tiktok with 20-30 mil views?

>>106639726
nta but those are funny

>>106639678
>I'm sorry, schlomo, but a conglomerate of Chinese studios have already released 4 sequels to $MARVEL_SLOP_4322 in the time we've been talking
>No, they do not enforce copyright nor do they have an extradition treaty with $GOY_COUNTRY_211

>>106639290
The director will suggest an idea, Ai will do the prompting, that will trigger other Ai to write the scripts and the videos.

>>106636391 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kb-rP0m5BA

skip forward to see gens. It will probably get better when quants arrive.

>>106639635
>>106639678
You'll pay a monthly fee and be able to prompt for whatever movie you want to watch.

>>106639790
I will pay nothing whatsoever, for anything, until I die.

>>106639412
>In some time, idk how long, you'll be able to one shot a feature length film.
as i have no personal interest in making movies...great. if one out of every 100 is kino, think of the great things we'll see. and as this is the industry that would laugh/make a buck on the rest of us being put out of work, wont shed a tear

>>106639816
>I will pay nothing whatsoever, for anything, until I die.
right there with you. my private tracker stays private. but i always thought eventually they'll through their hands up and say it's unstoppable and just add a piracy tax to our connections. what do then? every ISP has to add it, we'll be back to passing around thumbdrives

you guys don’t understand how this works. it was never about the technology. show business is just another extension of business, and stars are another extension of power, it was never about the technology and probably never will be. this will not kill hollywood, it will only make it easier for hollywood to keep doing what it has been doing up until now giving them cheaper and faster ways to keep their sacred cows alive forever. they are already working on laws against likeness theft with harsh punishments akin to dmca but way worse. they are also going to contact nvidia about a potential safeguard checking for a set of encrypted protected faces when generating images or text, which will be rolled as a protection tool for th customers to avoid generating potentially misleading content. soon the only gpus capable of generating uncensored content are going to be the owns already on the market, which are going to die in less than 5 years due to their suboptimal die. nothing ever happens. everything else will use a clip-like model on output to censor what is not appropriate. china is on this too: they more than the us need control over propaganda and need real stars to shift people around according to party lines.

t. editor in the industry for a decade, helped my boss label faces for this database proposal last week

>>106639825
>Mr. Stone! Given that everything that's ever been written has been integrated into our model, why should anyone pay you anything at all?
>You're a mediocre facsimile of all comedy writers, so you're owed literally nothing. The marginal value of a new south park episode has dropped to $0.06: you're fired.

>>106639862
How do you censor Chink models?

>>106639862
>checking for a set of encrypted protected faces when generating images or text
how long will people care about those 'protected faces' when they know it's all ai? if we know an actor/musician is just a pretty face put on top of ai slop, why would people care about them?

i cant wait for miku to be real

>>106639899
the idea is to keep a level of cultural stagnation with some faces becoming part of the permanent zeitgeist, think ryan gosling.

>>106639776
This is where I'm saying >>106639476, computers genuinely can't into that level of creativity shit. An 'idea' (and fill in the gaps) is not and never gonna work. Like I read a LOT of AI prompts, because reasons. And whatever cokehead keeps repeatedly requesting ideas for late-night sketch scripts, please, kindly fucking quit and kys already. But no matter how good the prompt - and I've genuinely read some great fucking prompts - AI is not good at creative, nor even filling in the gaps. And while I accept it def will get better at realistically depicting actors etc, 'creative' is a vacuum I can't see it filling anytime soon. At best, formulaic capeshit, maybe.

>>106639926
It doesn't have to be creative. Every show out there is just the regurgitated rests of previous shows. AI doesn't need to be creative, it just needs to have some output.

>>106639476
Unnamed faces without authorized access will use your characters to develop IP.
Nobody know or cares who works at Disney Inc, why would they care if some guy writes more compelling stories for SuperDude(TM) than than authorized writer? You think credentials will save you?
I can assure you, nobody knows who writes the latest marvelslop, so a random selection of chinese characters given writer's credit won't bother anyone at all.

>>106639915
>permanent zeitgeist, think ryan gosling
in 20 years and there will be no big holywood 'celebrities'. Gosling is 44 years old...and there's no upcomers replacing him. Chalamet? about to turn 30. anybody else? It'll be streams and streams of ai slop with a bunch of 'curators' getting fandoms

I reckon at some point "movie made by humans" will be a novelty and will get views based on that alone.
I dunno whether this will be a good or bad thing.

Cool. Now do this for more than 8 seconds, and keep the consistence.

>>106637249
Born too late to explore Earth, born too early to explore the stars, born just in time to watch AI whitewashed Harry Potter episodes.

>>106636391 (OP)
So what you're saying is I'll never have to look at a brownoid in cinema ever again?

Fake and gay.

>>106640065
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1jr6j11/long_consistent_ai_anime_is_almost_here_wan_21/

>>106638316
>vtubers
Normies dont watch that dogshit, it’s a niche thing for weeb coomers. Thinking those cartoon whores will ever become as popular as hollywood celebrities is pure ignorance and retardation.

>>106640593
>and extrapolate
People already love James Earl Jones's voice even when it is an AI recreating it

>>106637624
Look at this retarded street-shitting drone having a candid conversation with itself.

>>106640520
>only 3 minutes and still look like garbage

>>106640749
cope luddite

>>106640520
I wonder if you retards even look at the horrid patchwork you want to propose as the next big thing that's replacing traditional animation and live action. It's like you completely lack self-awareness and only care about some kind of accelerationism that's never going to happen. It's too computationally expensive, it's offering diminishing returns and there's not enough water in the world to cool it while it gets marginally better.

Fucking suicide cult of complete mongoloids.

>>106640756
Use a toilet, Devansh.

>>106640772
>you want to propose as the next big thing that's replacing traditional animation and live action
I didn't say this, printers and cameras didn't replace landscape artists
>It's too computationally expensive
That was made by one guy, from 5 months ago on a consumer GPU, people will continue to make these regardless of the cost.

>it's offering diminishing returns
No one is denying this
>there's not enough water in the world to cool it while it gets marginally better.
1. waters data centers use isn't erased from existence
2. that was made locally, not in a water cooled data center
>Fucking suicide cult
I am not banking on this, if it doesn't work out there is no skin off my bones

>>106638237
you really are some idiot, anon.

>>106636391 (OP)
>China just killed Hollywood
Based.
>it's just another imperfect video generator
Disappointing. Maybe some day.

Is it pozzed?

>>106640787
not an argument luddite

>>106636960
Give it 3 years

>>106641031
it is uncensored

>>106637006
It makes motion capture infinitely easier.

>>106641062
>just add time
lol cope

>>106636391 (OP)
Can't kill something that's already been dead for over a decade.

>>106637224
blue legs. They just fixed the design flaw with the original

So this is just the OG Deepfakes but on steroids since they're not only changing the faces but also the entire body and clothing?

>>106636391 (OP)
Is this how they are going to remove all black people from films? China really hates blacks, it's all so tiresome is their take.

All hypes, no real use case.

>>106636960
and? it's a proof of concept

>>106642168
>Deepfakes on steroids and open source
>No use case

>>106636391 (OP)
It looks somehow acceptable only becasue its low res. Despite that lack of continuity is clearly visible. Good for porn i guess.

>>106637391
>no way this doesn't end up being the way of things
it won't

>>106638237
It would be hilarious if Sony revives Aki Ross with AI.

It's over DEI bros. Only white people from now on.

>>106638006
>Well, if it can keep them away from real kids, why not after all.
That's not how pornography works. Someone who watches porn daily is not gonna get it out of their system. The person who consumes porn daily will always have porn and sex on their mind. The type and intensity of the porn they watch will get more degenerate as they continue to consume porn. Discontinuing porn use results in less degenerate and inappropriate thoughts about sex.

>>106642330
The shoes aren't quite right but holy shit that's impressive.

>>106636391 (OP)
>China just killed Hollywood
You cannot kill that which does not live!

>>106639179
his point was that the main character in spirits within was intended not to simply look as realistic as possible, but to be an "actress" appearing in other films as well. this concept didn't take off. cgi characters don't appear in films outside of their own franchise (unless it's a deliberate cross-over or something), unlike human actors/actresses who appear in many unrelated media just dressed up differently

It's basically only going to be used to replace browns in movies with whites for chinese release of films

>>106642193
Yet nobody has produced anything worthwhile with these techs.

>>106637296
you could generate ai videos with another ai tool and replace the inconsistently looking characters with more consistent characters, assuming this thing can do that and doesn't just change the clothing as it sees fit or something.

open source movies when?

>>106642572
>implying that's something only the Chinese wants
It's one of my most hyped features of AI, finally i can enjoy kino again

Had anyone tried this yet?

>>106636391 (OP)
Fuck yeah, time to take back movies and never include all black casts

>>106637774
I look like this and do hope this AI thing keeps advancing.

>>106637797
this is the golden age of captain picard chads

>>106637006
>what's the point
Fixing mistakes.

>>106636960
you can tell the actors in hollywood movies are jewish and trans

>>106641056
>luddite
Literal NFTard, cheering for a new scam.

>>106642330
>DEI
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? These Indian animals are just barking buzzwords at the /pol/troons begging for their support or something. That completely fucked up the lighting and looks uncanny as shit, by the way.

>>106642634
Because just producing these short clips uses enough water for a small american town for a year.
This garbage is an obscenely expensive solution in desperate need for a problem to solve.

>>106645597
You can't fix that trash with AI.
>>106646394
And vaxxers and fans of the 49ers and whatever the fuck else imaginary enemy they fed you this week, you coercible fat shit.

>>106643477
the equivalent to open source movies would be called public domain or creative commons movie, there are a few, I never bothered to watch them, I am too 'spend money' brain

>>106646585
nice try. Technically it would have been more accurate for me to say jewish OR trans. The exaggeration is part of the joke. There really are a lot of jews and trans in hollywood though.

>>106637584
i'm a little suprised we don't have one shot prompted ai sex celeb orgies yet.

>>106646522
That's not an argument either. Try again.

>>106642381
I watch lots of porn daily (non pedo) as a 28 yo virgin. so what's your point again? shouldn't I be raping women left and right?

>>106642381
>goyim, the more porn you consume the more degenerate you get! we have studies to prove it

so... according to you... logically, every gooner goes through a child porn phase then moves onto other, more decedant genres? What exactly is the tier list here? whats rock bottom?

1. straight sex
2. blow jobs
3. anal sex
4. lolis
5. trannies
6. beastiality
7. scat
8. snuff
9. gay sex with hats
10. ?????

>>106640772
Technological accelerationism is a good thing. Once the internet is riddled with AI slop everywhere and nothing can be trusted, we can collectively abandon it and go back to living our lives like in the 1960s, which was peak humanity, except with AI waifus and robot servants.

>>106640065
What do you mean? It's perfectly consistent.