Thread 106938398

>Jeff Bezos said that AI, rather than threatening humanity, will usher in an "age of abundance." Bezos said, "The next 20 years will be a golden age for humanity. Robots will work for us, and people will live shorter, but happier lives."
Do you agree with this shiny head?

uuuuuuuuhhhh why life will become shorter?

>>106938410
>lose job to ai
>less money
>can't afford healthcare
>die

>>106938398 (OP)
Irrelevant. He has no say in this matter.

>>106938410
He's planning to kill most of us, obviously.

>>106938410
time flies when you do nothing

>>106938410
Heart disease from sitting in a cubicle locked in VR 24/7 or perhaps they'll just straight up kill us once we turn 40
That and copious amounts of drugs and alcohol

>>106938420
/thread.

He and all his Globohomo (((cronies))) haven't been shy about their plots to off the goyim. It will soon be down to us or them. You decide the outcome, anon.

>>106938398 (OP)
Heard this for the past 50 years. All they will do is create more bureaucrats so that everyone's nose is up the other's ass. It's a shit of a world incoming.

>>106938398 (OP)
>The next 20 years will be a golden age for humanity.
Why only the next 20 years; what about the years proceeding them?
>people will live shorter, but happier lives.
As far as I know less stress is almost insperably correlated with a longer lifespan - no work means less stress.

>>106938410
>humans made to work 10x harder (and competing for said positions harder) doing the few tasks robots can't
>gladiator arenas where humans fight each other, wild animals and robots to the death
>dueling and the honor system makes a comeback
>the far majority of humans will starve and scrape on the streets for the barest needs
>slave trading relegalized, many sell themselves into slavery for short term sustenance that ultimately breaks and kills them
The next 20 years is going to be pure kinography. Will get very boring after the far majority of useless eaters are killed off, but the interim will be fantastic.

>>106938738
The mental health, and by extension physical health, of people with no real world struggles, triumphs, and defeats is pretty terrible. They start inventing problems like
>I was born in the wrong body

>>106938398 (OP)
>Robots will work for us
yeah amazon, not me. nice marketing pitch tho.

ai has yet to suck my dick in the form of a catgirl so it's globally worthless

>>106938757
Those are absolute lies. If you have a little happy family of your own, then there is no chance you'll ever fall into depression - if everything remains in order.

>>106938800
AI is whispering erotic sweet nothings in my ear with the voice of a cute child.

>>106938410
>people will live shorter, but happier lives
lmao SOURCE

>>106938398 (OP)
if you have more than a billion dollars just sitting around in cash you are a very
very
very
very
very
evil and selfish person.

>>106938865
Wrong. You're also gay and retarded.

Why hasn't AI replaced CEOs yet?

>>106938398 (OP)
There's no economic justification to invest in AI robots if we have infinite cheap labor, both internal and external.

>>106938398 (OP)
>people will live shorter...
hol up what

>>106938410
booster number fifty-five

>>106938398 (OP)
That's precisely what they thought of technology as a whole 70 years ago and, at least from a technical standpoint, we already reached that level.

Basic necessities such as food and clothing are cheaper than ever even in not-so developed countries and, while prices have risen significantly during the last 4-5 years of inflation, it's still nothing compared to ~150 years ago. Housing is kept artificially expensive because of speculation, lack of regulation and active lobbying against new builds, but the technical resources to have cheap housing already exist.

At least 50% of hours worked in most jobs are pointless and kept just because society says so. My 40h work week could be reduced to a 20h work week with no loss of productivity, and yours probably could as well.

>>106938398 (OP)
>people will live shorter, but happier lives.
what?

>>106938398 (OP)
wait a minute what the fuck is a shorter but happier life? Are we gonna have to fight in gladiator rings after 30 or something? Might be a good idea actually.

>>106938398 (OP)
Let's see: how little does he pay his employees?

>>106938916
There is no such thing as cheap enough. The value of each and every goy's life must be pummeled into the ground so hard it goes into the negatives.

>>106938398 (OP)
>and people will live shorter, but happier lives
kek

>>106938916
at some point humans will be more unreliable at anything you can imagine they could do, compared to some AI robot. and the robot work will be way way way way cheaper.
they can be copy-pasted so development happens once. by contrast each human needs training, that's a massive drain of resources. plus we unreliable.
humans must refactor human interaction, in a way that is not based on need. atm basically all human interactions is based on need. and I know from personal experience almost no human knows how to interact without needing something from someone else. and this is by design, masters shaped their slaves into this behavior because it's the most lucrative
downside is when you are useless for anyone then you aren't worth anything, you might as well just die as far as almost everyone else is concerned. that means only one thing when we're replaced by robots, we'll eventually be wiped without full refactoring of human interaction

>>106938410
>>106938738
>>106939686
>>106940804
(((Yuval Noah Harari))) said "We should keep useless class busy with games and drugs". Maybe they'll strap a VR headset on your head and slowly kill you with pills before you hit your middle ages.

>>106938398 (OP)
>Jeff Bezos said that AI, rather than threatening humanity, will usher in an "age of abundance." Bezos said, "The next 20 years will be a golden age for humanity. Robots will work for us, and people will live shorter, but happier lives."
I do agree but I think the writer made a mistake: Bozos is clearly talking about the rich oligarchs who are going to live in this wonderful age of abundance. Normal people are still going to be slaves no matter how you look at things.

>>106938398 (OP)
the age of abundance is for HIM. and his buddies.
we're all going to die in some kind of pandemic infinitely worse than COVID

>>106941350
he's advising his masters. that's how they think about the masses. doubt they'll reconsider their approach to how they view them, once "post-scarcity" is achieved. their incentive will be to wipe everyone out, that's obvious
once you think in terms of incentives, the whole state of the world starts making perfect sense

>>106941359
not sure money matters anymore at that point. it becomes something billionaires work with, between them.
if you cannot add value to the system you won't be rewarded.
they can, they have access to tech, manufacturing and resources, so they can still create value, thus still use money.

>>106938398 (OP)
>monopolizes all energy production to power LLMs that just make shit up
>can someone turn on the light? it's dark in here
>no, there's no electricity to power the light or the computer to test the code that doesn't work. and everyone just got fired.
>age of abundance
there seems to be a lack of causational link between the rhetoric and the reality.