Thread 106940818

Basic apple m5 chip completely mogs amd and intel.

>highly optimized benchmark
now use SVT-AV1 to encode some video :^)

>>106940818 (OP)
>applebench

>>106940818 (OP)
>be apple
>make 10000 million of dollars in profit per year
>spend a shit ton on hardware R&D
>mog everyone
yeah im seething. they should license the IP and not be so stingy. come on, let us have some good stuff Tim Apple plz

>>106940869
Tim needs to cease being a cuck and develop macOS for x86 too. I am currently running Sequoia on my AMD 6800 and 5600X Hackintosh, and I thoroughly enjoy it, unix that just werks.

Now this is what I'm talking about. Can't wait to see how good the M5 Pro, M5 Max and M5 Ultra's ray tracing performance is.

>>106940818 (OP)
>single core in hyper-specific benchmark
wdym "mogs" it still chugs at 30fps at best in gtav

cool but I need x86_64

>>106941125
>gtav
>designed for x86
>running on translation layer

If you genuinely care about gaming, consider purchasing a PlayStation 5, Xbox One, or Nintendo.

>>106941107
Based.

>>106940818 (OP)
cool story bro, my m4 pro 14/20 chip mogs both of you

>geekbench
>totally not cherrypicked tests in blender
>dogshit speed in real world workloads

>>106941188
>shilling this hard
Jeety soor du nut ridimfullel.

>>106941188
So in other words its overpriced piece of good for nothing shit?
Ok.

>>106941188
Nah, how about you consider necking yourself instead, faggot?

>>106941107
>Can't wait to see how good the M5 Pro, M5 Max and M5 Ultra's ray tracing performance is.
As usual, severely overpriced for what it worth.
Can't run windows and can't run linux too.
Its a toy cpu for toy pc.

too bad macos is utter dogshit, because the hardware is great

>>106941188
>If you genuinely care about gaming, consider purchasing a PlayStation 5, Xbox One, or Nintendo
In that case i am not interested in m5 and apple pcs.

>single core performance
Are appletards this retarded? This isn't the 90's were the os and applications only use a single core, even internet browsers spawn countless thread making the multi core bench a more real no world test, hell even macs are a multimedia editing powerhouse that need all the cores while encoding

>>106940818 (OP)
They literally own geekbench

>>106942312
Single core performance is still the most important for most tasks.

not interested

>>106942312
CPU bottlenecks are always on single cores. Just think about it.

>>106941188
Valve needs to work with Apple instead of AMD; a low-wattage RTX 5070-tier GPU in 2 years is what the Steam Deck needs.

>>106942740
Meds

>>106940818 (OP)
now post the geekbench5 scores

>tfw just bought an M4 Max last year
Did I fuck up? Should I have been a waitfag?

>>106942312
Most programmers suck at parallelism; some tasks like multiple browser tabs can be easily parallelized, sure, and tasks that are inherently a bunch of separate tasks (like software compilation) benefit well from many cores, but the bulk of things still benefit more from single core performance than core count.

Guys is an m3 MacBook Pro with 18gb of ram just not enough for RuneScape 3? I still get frame drops in player hubs. Like 5 fps which is absurd...I think this might the universe telling me to just play OSRS instead lmao.

>>106940818 (OP)
>geekbench
top kek

>>106941107
>look saar, very X times better saar

>>106942304
It runs pro software that Linux currently doesn't.

>>106942304
100,000+ Linux Distributions are dog shit.

>>106944104
>>106944476

>muh pro software
>muh lonix
let's start with basic shit, like supporting third party peripherals out of the box. I shouldn't need third party software (some of it is paid for fuck's sake) just to have mouse buttons and a scroll wheel work correctly on a logitech mouse. Let's not even talk about enterprise-wide deployment and maintenance - it's unusable for any real work. Again I absolutely love the hardware, and actually bought an M1 mini when they came out that still runs well today, and I'm blown away by the current year's specs. But every year or two when I want to take another look at the mac ecosystem I'm reminded of how much of a closed off shitshow it is.

>>106940818 (OP)
Let's see if it passes a real benchmark, which is gaming. Jeetbench in 2025? Nigga how..

I only accept 7z b as my benchmark, sorry.

>>106940818 (OP)
>cant upgrade ram
>cant upgrade ssd
useless.

>>106940818 (OP)
Has Geekbench even been proven to represent reality? Is it used only because it's only benchmark on iOS?

>>106941107
thats actually mental

>>106945821
You're not allowed to use it wrong

>>106940818 (OP)
>3nm is better than 4nm
>this is a huge accomplishment, how did apple figure this out

>>106946201
Intel jumped from 14 nm to 1.8 so that’s an automatic 1000x performance multiplier. I can’t wait.

>>106940828
>>highly optimized benchmark
>now use SVT-AV1 to encode some video :^)
As somebody who recently converted over 2TB of video to av1 on macbook pro: seems to work fine?

>>106940818 (OP)
>Basic apple m5 chip completely intel.
never happened

>>106946041
cringe

>>106946201
>smaller means faster
dumb fucking retards, everyone.

>>106940818 (OP)
kys, shill

>>106946269
sure you did. we totally believe you, rajeesh.

>>106940818 (OP)
How much die space does Fruit reserve for Geekbench acceleration by now, anyway?

>>106940818 (OP)
>>106941107
>>106946269
>>106944735
>>106944476
get a toilet currynigger