← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106998394

34 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.106998394 [Report] >>106998748 >>106998858 >>106998905 >>106998914 >>106999350 >>106999425 >>106999634 >>107000309 >>107001526 >>107002774 >>107002827 >>107003574 >>107003668 >>107004281 >>107004645
Fedora approves AI-assisted contributions
https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/23/fedora_agrees_policy_allowing_ai_assisted_code_contribs/
Anonymous No.106998748 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Is this going to affect GNOME, systemd, etc.?
Anonymous No.106998858 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Sigh
Time to distrohop
Anonymous No.106998905 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
someone will read the contribution to see if it is not that sloppy buggy code, so things kill keep likely the same
Anonymous No.106998914 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Nobody (who matters) cares.
Anonymous No.106999350 [Report] >>106999600 >>107000176 >>107000231 >>107002156
>>106998394 (OP)
>Fedora approves AI-assisted contributions
There is and there will be even LLM kernel contributions, if a programmer uses LLM's it's not bad. Also Fedora is literally the best distro atm.
>Debian has the biggest repo?
Lmao, you basically need to enable 3rd party repos for everything
>Arch has the biggest repo?
Lmao. you basically need to load everything from the AUR
>Huh?
Stop coping, Fedora -> RHEL gets shipped to fortune 500 companies, it's the most secure ootb distro out there with the biggest repo and the best quality control.
Anonymous No.106999425 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Every distro is going to have AI-assisted patches submitted. That's just a fact, whether the contributors disclose that they used AI or try to hide it. Fedora just decided to enforce an AI policy. A quite reasonable one, if you ask it. Contributors are more likely to disclose that they used AI assistance since it's not outright banned, and those patches will be reviewed with more scrutiny.
Anonymous No.106999600 [Report] >>106999617 >>107001535
>>106999350
>Fedora is literally the best distro atm
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Anonymous No.106999617 [Report] >>106999641
>>106999600
Notice how this anon avoids saying anything of substance.
He just mashes his keyboard like an autistic orangutan, thinking he did something.
Anonymous No.106999634 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
shit now i gotta move my server off of fedora.
Anonymous No.106999639 [Report]
>doubles down
Anonymous No.106999641 [Report]
>>106999617
Yep. I mean my posts sounds baity, but it's true at its core and instead of coming up with arguments, this chimps just laughs.
Anonymous No.107000176 [Report] >>107000270 >>107000436 >>107002804 >>107003064
>>106999350
>Fedora
>biggest repo
Brutally repomogged by NixOS.
Anonymous No.107000231 [Report]
>>106999350
2 rupees have been deposited into your bank account
Anonymous No.107000270 [Report]
>>107000176
TrannyOS ist just like Arch, also filled with tranny 3rd party packages
Anonymous No.107000309 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Good. AI is the future. Fedora will blast past every distro that does not adopt 100% AI production. 1000x productivity from AI will ensure the year of the linux desktop is 2026.
Anonymous No.107000436 [Report]
>>107000176
the aur doesn't even fucking count
it's essentially bash scripts that just dump files from whatever website onto your computer, and a lot of times that means you have to compile them yourself like gentoo
Anonymous No.107001526 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Meeh not bad imo. I'd rather see Canonical do it with Ubuntu instead, tho. But I think it's fine some of this corpo distros get fucked by actually indians so that the other distros (and the world) can see how horrible it is.
Anonymous No.107001535 [Report]
>>106999600
Cope.
Fedora is currently indeed one of the best distros. As horrifying as that sounds.
Anonymous No.107002156 [Report] >>107005085
>>106999350
RPM Fusion doesn't count as 3rd party?
Anonymous No.107002774 [Report] >>107002787
>>106998394 (OP)
how are they going to deal with the fact that llms often insert the code verbatim from their dataset? there's so much legal and licensing issues, it's unreal how retarded this decision is, as of now.
Anonymous No.107002787 [Report]
>>107002774
Cool it with the transphobia
Anonymous No.107002804 [Report]
>>107000176
Yes, on the other hand, nobody actually uses NixOS on a desktop.
Anonymous No.107002827 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
This is funny, it is somewhat impressive that every time you install a software in linux it has dozens of dependencies. Even C software what originally was portable.
Now you have so many dependencies that nothing is portable.
10 years from now things will get so messed up and it'll be funny to see. They'll compete for an AI platform what is best at unfucking other AI created code.
Anonymous No.107002838 [Report] >>107003472 >>107005181
It's a question of licensing. Who owns the copyright if you generate code? Is it the author whose code was fed into the training data, the AI model owner, you or no one? And is that code free software? If not, it must be a policy to reject that code.
Anonymous No.107003064 [Report]
>>107000176
>majority of packages are just shit you'd use pip to install on any other system
Anonymous No.107003472 [Report]
>>107002838
Red Hat has lawyers, I don't think they would accept this risk if the lawyers weren't fairly confident that it wouldn't become an issue.
Anonymous No.107003574 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
Anonymous No.107003668 [Report] >>107004186
>>106998394 (OP)
its time to move one
Anonymous No.107004186 [Report]
>>107003668
>>no nvidia support
Never gonna make it passed servers
Anonymous No.107004281 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
fucking redhat
Anonymous No.107004645 [Report]
>>106998394 (OP)
ive been using 'ai assisted contributions' at work since like 2022 i think its silly to even state sucha 'policy' given everyone's doing it right now already.

i think this is more about documenting which tool was used on which part for identifying fuckups or problems with tools
Anonymous No.107005085 [Report]
>>107002156
It does, but all the important fusion packages are actually packaged by fed(ora) employees, they just don't include them in the main repo because of their strict FOSS philosophy and to be legally completely clean, even with codecs.
Anonymous No.107005181 [Report]
>>107002838
This is what most people tend to scream about when AI meets FOSS, muh copyright infringement. It's a legal grey area but most companies are moving full speed ahead anyways. to be frank if it ever did hit the courtroom every corporation on the planet would band together to ensure it's deemed legal so it's best to just accept it and move on