I know you're going to say it isn't.
It has a double flash visible in the video.
Slow it down and watch
The brightness ramps up, levels off, dips, brightens again, then lowers,
then drastically lowers as the Xrays have done their work and only incandecence lights the gas.
Notice how the entire countryside is as if it were daybreak.
Notice there is a line of trees,
then water,
then another line of trees,
then more water,
then another line of trees,
and behind that the rising plasma.
It is a nuclear weapon.
Additionally all of toropets tver was evacuated.
And cesium 137 was detected that day on the border station at norway, in elevated levels.
This was a nuclear explosion. Of a fissile pit.
You will say it is not.
It was.
>>107002874
>if it was nuke they would evacuate all the surroundings and further on wind direction because of fallout
They did.
>>107003905
>if it was a nuke the radiation would interfere with the camera if not fry it outright you stupid faggot
Not a 3kt fissile pit.
Not underground.
They're far enough away.
Modern designs are much more efficient than the originals and do not dump 99 percent of their energy doing a EM sweep that escapes before it can heat up the surrounding material.
>>107003470
>if it was a nuke the sensor of the camera would have burnt out bc of the intense light
Incorrect, the EM sweep is not shown in the video (initial detonation). Strange that, isn't it?
>and if by some miracle it wouldnt
>picrel is how your image would have looked like bc of ionizing radiation
As I said: modern designs are more efficent; and the yeild is low (3kt)
additionally videos show closer did show scintalation.
You want to fight?
I'm not a "ukranian" nor a "retard"
I'm a licensed attorney and a programmer.
My father worked on the apollo project.
It has a double flash visible in the video.
Slow it down and watch
The brightness ramps up, levels off, dips, brightens again, then lowers,
then drastically lowers as the Xrays have done their work and only incandecence lights the gas.
Notice how the entire countryside is as if it were daybreak.
Notice there is a line of trees,
then water,
then another line of trees,
then more water,
then another line of trees,
and behind that the rising plasma.
It is a nuclear weapon.
Additionally all of toropets tver was evacuated.
And cesium 137 was detected that day on the border station at norway, in elevated levels.
This was a nuclear explosion. Of a fissile pit.
You will say it is not.
It was.
>>107002874
>if it was nuke they would evacuate all the surroundings and further on wind direction because of fallout
They did.
>>107003905
>if it was a nuke the radiation would interfere with the camera if not fry it outright you stupid faggot
Not a 3kt fissile pit.
Not underground.
They're far enough away.
Modern designs are much more efficient than the originals and do not dump 99 percent of their energy doing a EM sweep that escapes before it can heat up the surrounding material.
>>107003470
>if it was a nuke the sensor of the camera would have burnt out bc of the intense light
Incorrect, the EM sweep is not shown in the video (initial detonation). Strange that, isn't it?
>and if by some miracle it wouldnt
>picrel is how your image would have looked like bc of ionizing radiation
As I said: modern designs are more efficent; and the yeild is low (3kt)
additionally videos show closer did show scintalation.
You want to fight?
I'm not a "ukranian" nor a "retard"
I'm a licensed attorney and a programmer.
My father worked on the apollo project.
