Thread 107123092

>older than microsoft
>older than apple
>still the trademark of every skilled developer
>replaces the entire OS with better tools
>can be extended and customized to its very core
>doesn't even need a GUI

I'm not even aware of any other software with a track record like this.
How does EMACS do it?

>>107123092 (OP)
EMAC

>>107123092 (OP)
at least it makes google seethe

>doesn't even need a GUI
Enjoy your shitty software dying out because you are desperate to gatekeep it from normal people. I don't mind using a terminal when it's faster like that but it's objectively inferior for programs. Just phase it out.

>>107123092 (OP)
> replaces the entire OS with better tools
It’s practically the modern embodiment of a lisp machine. One day we will get lisp accelerator cards from tom knight that will surpass GPU and AI capabilities.
Lisp was an early language used when AI was real, which is now called symbolic AI.

>>107123092 (OP)
lol, it does the same for VIM

>>107123092 (OP)
>>older than microsoft
> Founded in 1975
>The first operational EMACS system existed in late 1976

>>107123812
Microsoft is dropping vbscript.
Since the company was founded on their release of basic on the Altair, vbscript going defunct is symbolic of a company that is “microsoft” in name only. He’s dead, jim.

>>107123767
emacs has GUI, it also works in terminal

>>107123767
Most people who use Emacs use it with the GTK GUI, I doubt that's the reason why Emacs will die out.

>>107123092 (OP)
it just werks

I just set up Emacs. I moved from NeoVim to Emacs.

>>107123092 (OP)
Emacs is fucking shit. I've been using it to do some stuff in common lisp and it's hands down the worst editor I've used. If you turn on an lsp and sytax highlighting it takes 2-3 seconds for auto-complete to work and if you scroll up in your source code it can take 10s+ for the theme to be applied to the new section of the code. Emacs is old, shit and a relic of the past. Neovim and even fucking vscode are miles better in every single conceivable way, unless you're playing the game of what's the worst editor which emacs is the king of hands down.

>>107124222
>theme
Like text color? You're not using a background, are you?

>>107124260
Yes like text color.

>>107124222
>lsp is slow as shit
switch to eglot

>>107124294
I've had vim tweak a bit when left running for several days with like 4 splits open, but never experienced anything like that. Are you running on a potato? I actually am, and I've never had those issues.

Maybe I made the right choice.

>>107124460
Not a great system but a 10600k, 16gb ram, 1tb nvme, rtx 3070 - linux mint.

>>107124222
>if you scroll up in your source code it can take 10s+ for the theme to be applied to the new section of the code

What mode is this happening in?

>>107124510
Yeah, I'm running a celeron with 2gb of ram, 64Gig ssd in a 12 year old dell, and vim is smooth as silk with a bloat lsp and full syntax highlighting.

I doubt vsc would even be useless on my toaster. Youtube barely even loads. Vim was definitely the right choice.

>>107123092 (OP)
That logo on the right looks terrible holy shit

>>107123767
emacs does have a GUI though, it can do both

>>107123767

there is zero need to gatekeep EMACS when it filters so many already

>>107123762
>>107123778
I set up a uBO filter for this. I do not care for childish editor war bullshit.

>>107124510
insane levels of user error, nano and vscode are for swarthoids like you

>>107123092 (OP)
>15 years ago
>sublime text
>10 years ago
>vim vscode
>5 years ago
nvim
>now
doom emacs
can't wait for 5 more years for exwm

>>107123762
it does it the other way too retard

>>107124151
>Belly World
Do I want to know?

>>107123092 (OP)
>>replaces the entire OS with better tools
>>>better

>>107128230
Is doom emacs any good? I'm pretty happy with regular emacs but something more lightweight would be nice

>>107124222
i am currently limited to a potato and i have no idea what you are saying (4th gen mobile i5). font-lock is instantaneous and lsp mode is also quick enough. if you are using company for auto complete you have to manually speed it up by changing `company-idle-delay`. it could be that you are using spacemacs with mountains of unused bloat, possibly windows, modifying 50k line files, or simply a skill issue.

>>107130755
doom is just a bloat script. if you are happy with regular emacs why just add a bunch of shit you will never use? if there is any functionality it has you can simply add it to your existing emacs init.el

>>107123092 (OP)
>still the trademark of every skilled developer
More like the trademark of unemployed autists with nothing better to do with their time but fiddle around with their Emacs config all day.

>>107130863
Whip yourself publicly somewhere else tard lmao