Thread 107147054

pay up.

>>107147054 (OP)
This guy is going to bankrupt every boomer ira with exposure to nasdaq so nobody can inherit anything. Must be part of the plot to own nothing.

>>107147075
Thanks for that quick rundown

>>107147054 (OP)
Doesn't this just expose how shit our power generation is? We have been boiling water for electricity for hundreds of years.

>>107147075
Imagine having some of the most concentrated wealth in the country but everyone wants your head on a pike. dude should have golden parachuted after gpt5

>>107147114
What would we boil instead?

>>107147075
/g/ still has critical thinking

>>107147054 (OP)
Altman is a snake. A fintech bro whose biggest talent is manipulating people into giving him money.

>>107147130
>Imagine having some of the most concentrated wealth in the country but everyone wants your head on a pike.
Who? The people that spend 18 out of 24 hours on tiktok or youtube videos? Surely they will be able to tell truth from lies and no one will try to hide the truth from public opinion

>>107147054 (OP)
Why can't they just reduce the taxes for everyone? It would make the entire economy super competitive. We would leave China in the dust. Now we pay five times more taxes than 125 years ago and we have less freedoms, everything is corrupt and wasteful as fuck and 70% of the country doesn't even produce any value because they live on welfare or useless state mandated jobs.

>>107147356
ok, just give up all of the infrastructure and social safety nets.

>>107147114
Propose an alternative, or you are just another shitposter that needs to go back to /b/ or r*ddit.

>>107147356
people that get in charge "By the will of the people" have no responsibility once they get off, they have no long sightedness, they only care about pleasing their voters temporarily, and that means stupid decisions that will lead to high taxes. What's the president going to care 4 years from now? Is any other president legally persecuted for the state of things now? Are people able to be discontent with the state? No, because they tell you the state is many parties, so you think it's their fault. No legal separation of classes may mean more equality, but also means no one is ultimately held responsible or has any interest in long sigthedness of the nation's economics i.e. capital value of things. Put simply: a politician would chose to give the fish instead of teaching the beggar how to fish.

>>107147463
>and social safety nets.
These don't exist for white men.

>>107147054 (OP)
I thought the US was the capital of Capitalism(tm). Why the fuck is the government involved? Let the markets decide

>>107147356
If you dig deep enough you'll find that every single American tech company has it's roots in Cold War military spending.

>>107147510
Yes they do.

>>107147054 (OP)
no taxation without chatgpt credits

>>107147356
If they reduce taxes, then the government will get less money and people will work less.

>>107147463
>ok, just give up all of the infrastructure and social safety nets.
How did they manage to keep up the infrastructure from five times less taxes 125 years ago?
And public social safety net is the most harmful thing what humankind ever created unironically. It takes money from the diligent and gives it to the lazy. If you have a real job then public safety net is a loss for you.

>>107147488
100% this

>>107147814
>How did they manage to keep up the infrastructure from five times less taxes 125 years ago?
It didn't exist you fucking retard. Most people didn't even have indoor plumbing outside of big cities.

>>107147668
>If they reduce taxes, then the government will get less money and people will work less
Lol! No! It's the opposite. It's basic logic.

>>107147845
>It didn't exist you fucking retard.
The fucking retard calls everyone else a fucking retard. Ironic.
There was infrastructure in 1900. It wasn't the stone age.
And now the infrastructure accounts for roughly 6% of the total expenditure.

>>107147930
How many people had electricity in 1900?
How many highways were there in 1900?

we shoudl be spending trillions of dollars on this shit to put the chinks to bed. remove black people if necessary

>>107147971
There was an trans-continental railroad. Don't know how many people needed an interstate highway system for their horse and buggy.

>>107147054 (OP)
this guy is such a kike freak. Chatgpt has countless competitors that have nearly the same performance. I bet this pervert did diddle his sister. fucking freak

>>107148022
How did they pay for highways and the electric grid? Where did that money come from?

>>107148042
Interstate highways were taxes. There were roads that had already been there since horses, but they weren't highways.

Electrification, unless you're specifically talking about rural Electrification, was primary Edison funded by Morgan and Westinghouse. In 1900, the year you specifically picked (which is comical because there were no cars), even industry barely used electricity. It was mostly water powered even still. Electricity was still a novelty for the rich in that year.

You need to read up before you engage in adult conversation, because even if your points are incidentally correct, you look like a clown that doesn't know what he's talking about.

>>107148096
>Interstate highways were taxes
But taxes are paid, they dont pay for anything.

The parasite is dying.

>>107148110
I'm not going to play little games with you all night. You either deliberately argue in bad faith, or just don't actually know anything. Words games are pointless.

>>107147335
That's anti-semitic. Please go back to /pol/

>>107147971
You are nitpicking. The infrastructure was proportional to the size of that economy. Now the infrastructure has the same proportion but we have five times more taxes.
And you just ignored this:
>the infrastructure accounts for roughly 6% of the total expenditure.

>>107147054 (OP)
>rich ceo
>bankrupt startup
There's a name for that.

We need a luigi

>>107147075
>sell shiny rocks for line goes up
>line goes down

>>107147054 (OP)
>Now Altman is trying to grift the US government
At a perfect time too, when it's ran by grifters!

>>107148362
>There's a name for that.
>>107148161
>That's anti-semitic. Please go back to /pol/

>>107147668
>Government has less money
>No more money to bibi or on dumb shit like a golden ballroom
Oh no, the horror!

an edit of this is due

it needs to mention entertaining niggers with the world's most advanced chips and computation algorithms that run on said chils

>>107147114
We actually have pretty good power generation, overall. You can make arguments about whether it is 'clean' or 'green' or 'sustainable', but in terms of output alone the whole planet is pretty much in a constant state of electrical output growth.
The actual problem is AI's are incredibly wasteful. The Human brain is powered by sandwiches and consumes as much electricity as a lightbulb in a refrigerator. An AI server farm requires nuclear power.

>>107147532
This

>>107147054 (OP)
amerigolems, pay up, your jewish overlords are hungry

What happens next?

>>107147814
Social safety nets have their problems, but I simply don't want some poor grandma to starve. My ideal would be to only give it to those who need it, no idea why it's so hard to do.

>>107150402
>consumes as much electricity as a lightbulb in a refrigerator
this just isnt true, your body eats about 0.8watt per kg for men and about 0.7 for women. for a 100kg man thats about 80w, your entire fridge and not just the light

>>107147814
federal income tax didn't exist 125 years ago

>>107150548
>I simply don't want some poor grandma to starve.
Where are her kids? Why don't they help her?
What is the incentive for creating a big helping family if you can manage without them?
Public social nets are actually antisocial nets. It makes people antisocial and lazy. It's the biggest drive behind plummeting birthrates.

>>107151359
It used to get its money from selling federal lands, but there hasn't been any new indian land added to the US in a while, so that's a no go.
Also, spending used to be just a few offices in Washington and 10 guys with grandpas civil war era rifle as an army. Today the US military spends more money on AC than most countries do on the entire military.

>>107147054 (OP)
Didn't Trump already axe CHIPS?

>>107150681
He must have meant an incandescent light.

>>107147054 (OP)
Guys if you wanna buy stuff or travel or idk get your teeth done. Now it's the time. AI bubble shit will level everything for decades.

>>107147054 (OP)
At this rate they will never deliver
Even when they actually produced something good, they will keep it to themselves until chinks released something comparable, and keep demanding money to keep themselves in the """race""", forever

>>107151846
shhhhh

>>107151378
>It's the biggest drive behind plummeting birthrates.
It's woman's rights.
Welfare benefits single mother sheboon with 7 children the most

>>107147075
Its a plot to make it harder for Musk to fight in court by tying up the company with everyone's self-interest. Musk wants OpenAI to be non-profit. Altman wants OpenAI to be his company. Legally, OpenAI charter cannot be for-profit. Altman has on the record claimed he doesn't own OpenAI shares. But OpenAI has become for profit and wants to give Altman a good chunk of the shares.

There's a reason why Altman is selling off OpenAI to Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD, Gov, everyone. Its because OpenAI is not his, so he's selling the company off

>>107151884
That doesn't explain plummeting birthrates.
If anything, birthrates should be up if you get more benefits.
The reality is that those benefits don't actually go far enough to make it worthwhile. When a lot of the population were farmers or family businesses where the children could contribute to the income of the family, having more children is an obvious economic benefit.
But industrialization has increase productivity which has driven down the number of workers required, and often raised the skill level of the required workers (your kids would have to be in their teens to operate the equipment to be able to contribute to your family income), and at the same time education costs have sky rocketed (getting an education is literally tied to being in debt now).
To a lot of people, it is not economically viable to have 5+ kids. Or even more than two.

>>107147075
what facebook didnt do he will

>>107151913
>Musk
kek