>>107167287
How does passkeys help? Credentials can be stolen from cookies, localStorage (MUH HECKIN CSRFs DOH) or whatever real credential exists.
>>107167382
There is literally everything wrong with it
1. (((requires))) physical hardware or a (((conveniently allowed))) cloud service
2. Ridiculously complex
3. Windows (most normie used OS) has the worst passkey prompt in the form of Hello which tries to bait you into using some phone bullshit.
4. You'll still need some kind of backdoor because hardware breaks. Even at work I have at least 2 ways to login: fido or some phone bullshit.
Hardware breaks? You're fucked. Cuck bullshit response? Have more than one, oh and make sure you have more than one off-site as well. Limited key slots too goy, better buy the 100+ dollar deluxe one.
Can allow user to backup their keys? Oops, your key is now blacklisted from (((certain))) sites.
The other cloud shit is blatantly anticompetitive bullshit. I shouldn't need to spell out how bad it is. The keepass* fork drama should be enough to dumpster the whole retarded concept.
Ultimately I don't believe it's any better than Kerberos, mutual TLS or even ssh2 key auth and adds a lot of stupid shit that exists to inconvenience users (with cost and hardware anxiety) and competitors for no reason.