>>8680013
Ironically this might cause the generation AFTER them to go into the opposite direction again (well, as long as no big shit hits the fan in-between).
I'm presonally convinced that the huge amount of political influence radical christians got in the 80s directly contributed to the rapid decline of religiousity in the generations afterwards. After all they used that power to attack and destroy everything the youth liked, often lying to get their goals. Sure, most christians weren't like this, but the most visible were, and let's not forget the dark consequences of the satanic cult abuse hysteria.
Too bad it's won't do us any good, we all are in our 20s or 30s.
There are other dark possibilties, the EU and Airstrip One is rapidly approaching a bureaucratic authoritarian state, going straight to late Soviet Union with no Dear Leader. USA might go on, but the burgers still need some soul searching (and reforms).
And the entire worldwide financial elite needs to be wiped out, too be honest. Just too many of them, with too much wealth concentrated.
I just don't know.
>>8680367
>horseshoe theory
I will repeat what I typed in the other thread here: I personally consider Left and Right not to be ideologies or movements, but broad alliances between various political and social groups that formed to similar goals/historical reasons/convenience. There's two ,because that's the only long-term stable number. Exact composition can shift: workers, a social group that's generally political conservative moved from the Left to the Right in the last 20 years for various reasons i.e. - they were on the Left in the first place because pro-worker communism was on the Left, and communism was Left because back then Left meant mostly "republican" and Right "monarchist". That's it. No horseshoe needed.
