Thread 18087893

We were lied to…

He literally had dinner with the good guys in london, twice, last week though

The redpill is that it's the infinite money printers competing with each other

the british were the first to take the infinite money printing to the extreme and created the largest empire the world had ever known. They justified this by saying they were morally superior. So when you look at america you should see the US, you should see the federal reserve. And the federal reserve is saying "I secure the right to print infinite money for the american empire because the american empire is morally the best."

The germans wanted to peel themselves away from anglo financial dominance and start their own financial system. Kind of similar to BRICS.

>>18087910
money spigot, spray and pray

>>18087893 (OP)
Would good guys murder 6 million Jewish civilians?

>>18087910
Everything else is obfuscation. The only real threat to freedom was the freedom that the banks had. The empires ended - not the banks.

>>18087928
Great question!

>>18087928


https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1760842987215895.mp4

>>18087928
https://youtu.be/VImnpErdDzA

>>18087928
YES
>Y
>E
>S
and many more ... using them to work until starvation while building larger and larger camp.

>>18087946
Since there are tons of evidence and they all hated Jews and were openly talking about killing them then I guess that nazis would engage in a mass murder of Jews

>>18087950
The fact that arguably a majority of people will fall for this obvious A.I. sloppa makes it 10x more funny than the fact its A.I. itself. Sort of like how that banksy painting became 10x more valuable after it was literally shredded whilst being auctioned.

>>18088081
Who didn't hate Jews?
What about Haavara Agreement?

>>18088134
racism and bigotry is a mark of an uneducated man so a lot of people hate minorities.
Still, nazis murdered 6 million Jews in just a few years so that's kinda too much, even for an avarage racist. I wouldn't like to live in a world where small children would starve next to my street

>>18088162
Have you been to Gaza?

>>18088162
Anything the Nazis did, whatever the excesses, were in self defence. Compare the suffering inflicted on the Russians by Jewish Chekists and commissars in the early years of the Soviet Union.

I don't give a shit about the holocaust. I don't care if it was 5 million, I don't care if it was 7 million. The jews aren't my people and are hostile to my people. And the last few years have proven that their tears were false, they never gave a shit about the holocaust on principle, they only cared because it happened to them.

>>18088188
Anything the Jews did, whatever the excesses, were in self defence. Compare the suffering inflicted on the Nazis by Pagan Germans and SSmans in the years of the Second World War.

I don't give a shit about the Gaza. I don't care if it was 5 million, I don't care if it was 7 million. The palestinians aren't my people and are hostile to my people. And the last few years have proven that their tears were false, they never gave a shit about the Gaza on principle, they only cared because it happened to them.

>>18088206
You can't play this game when the jews have spent the last 80 years producing sop story propaganda about how it's bad on principle to commit genocide. If you spend years whining about a wrongdoing, make it central to your identity, talking about "Never again", and then do the same very wrongdoing, we're right to dismiss you as hypocritical. The jews wouldn't have all cared if it was Germans being loaded into gas chambers, they'd be fine with it. The same way they were fine tyrannizing and slaughtering Russians all across Russia after the revolution.

If you're going to holocaust museums like it's some religious shrine and making your identity all about the genocide, people are right to call you two faced and hypocritical when you commit one of your own.

>they never gave a shit about the Gaza on principle

I don't lol, I don't give a shit about the Arabs. I am somewhat of a Zionist though. I want Israel to continue to exist so they all one day can be made to fuck to fuck off back there. Ideally a two state solution would be the best, but I really don't care that much.

>>18088218
>Jews brought glorious comunism to Russia
based?

>>18088083
Every single person mentioned in this image is burning in Hell for being pagan, why would you ever try to derive any morality lessons from them?

>>18088280
How do you know?

>>18087928
no, so it is very strange this is the slander thrown onto the good guys.

>>18088081
Liberals openly hate and talk about killing conservatives, is there a conservative genocide going on right now?
Chuds openly hate and talk about TND, are blacks being hunted in the streets?

People say things.

>>18088615
>is there a conservative genocide going on right now
God i hope
>Chuds openly hate and talk about TND, are blacks being hunted in the streets?
chuds are internet only chickenhawks, you can't really compare them to nazis

>>18087893 (OP)
>he still thinks in terms of good and evil

Totalitarianism is bad, actually. Whether under commutroons or national-socialist troons. The British character (Canadian, & Australian) naturally resists this sort of tyranny.
>This is our great year of decision. Are we for the Socialist State, with its subordination of the individual to the universal officialdom of government, or are we for the ancient British faith that governments are the servants of the people, a faith which has given fire and quality and direction to the whole of our history for 600 years?
-Sir Robert Menzies, 1946, in reflection on the global war of ideas between totalitarianism and liberalism.

>>18089809
>Fellow Australians, it is my melancholy duty to inform you officially that in consequence of a persistence by Germany in her invasion of Poland, Great Britain has declared war upon her and that, as a result, Australia is also at war. No harder task can fall to the lot of a democratic leader than to make such an announcement. Great Britain and France, with the cooperation of the British Dominions, have struggled to avoid this tragedy. They have, as I firmly believe, been patient. They have kept the door of negotiation open. They have given no cause for aggression. But in the result, their efforts have failed and we are therefore, as a great family of nations, involved in a struggle which we must at all costs win and which we believe in our hearts we will win.

>What I want to do tonight is just to put before you, honestly, and as clearly as I can, a short account of how this crisis has developed.

>The history of recent months in Europe has been an eventful one. It will exhibit to the eyes of the future student some of the most remarkable instances of a ruthlessness and indifference to common humanity which the darkest centuries of European history can scarcely parallel. Moreover, it will, I believe, demonstrate that the leader of Germany has, for a long time, steadily pursued a policy which was deliberately designed to produce either war or a subjugation of one non-German country after another by the threat of war.

>>18089823
>We all have vivid recollections of September of last year. In Berlin on September the 26th 1938, Hitler said, referring to the Sudeten German problem, which was then approaching its acutest stage, ‘And now the last problem which must be solved, and which will be solved, concerns us. It is the last territorial claim which I have to make in Europe.’ Four days later, at Munich, when the problem had been settled on terms which provided for the absorption of the Sudeten country into Germany, and which otherwise professed to respect the integrity of the remainder of the Czechoslovak state, Hitler participated with the Prime Minister of Great Britain in a statement which went out to all the world. It’s most important sentence was this: ‘We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other question that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible causes of difference, and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.’

>What a strange piece of irony that seems today, only 12 months later. In those 12 months, what has happened? In cold-blooded breach of the solemn obligations implied in both the statements I have quoted, Hitler has annexed the whole of the Czechoslovak state. Has, without flickering an eyelid, made a pact with Russia, a country the denouncing and reviling of which has been his chief stock-in-trade ever since he became chancellor. And has now, under circumstances which I will describe to you, invaded with armed force and in defiance of civilised opinion, the independent nation of Poland. Your own comments on this dreadful history will need no reinforcement by me. All I need say is, that whatever the inflamed ambitions of the German Fuhrer may be, he will undoubtedly learn, as other great enemies of freedom have learned before, that no empire, no dominion, can be soundly established upon a basis of broken promises or dishonoured agreements.

>>18089827
>Let me say something about the events of the last few days. The facts are not really in dispute. They are, for the most part, contained in documents which are now a matter of record.

>On Friday August the 25th, that is, nine days ago, Hitler asked the British Ambassador to call on him, and had a long interview with him. Hitler said that he wished to make a move towards England, as decisive as his recent Russian move, but that first the problem of Danzig and the Corridor must be solved. He went on to indicate that he was looking forward to a general European settlement and that if this could be achieved, he would be willing to accept a reasonable limitation of armaments. On Saturday August the 26th, the British Ambassador flew to London to give a detailed account of his conversation to the British Government. On Sunday the 27th, the British Cabinet fully considered the whole matter and, incidentally, was apprised by me of the views of the Australian Government. On Monday August the 28th, the British reply, which I may say was entirely in line with our own views, was taken back to Berlin and was delivered to Hitler in the evening. That reply stated that the British Government desired a complete and lasting understanding between the two countries and agreed that a prerequisite to such a state of affairs was a settlement of the German-Polish differences. It emphasised the obligations which Great Britain had to Poland and made it clear that Great Britain could not acquiesce in a settlement which would put in jeopardy the independence of a state to which it had given its guarantee. The government said, however, that it would be prepared to participate in an international guarantee or any settlement reached by direct negotiation between Germany and Poland which did not prejudice Poland’s essential interests. The note pointed out that the Polish Government was ready to enter into discussions and that it was hoped that the German Government would do the same.

>>18089852
>On the night of Tuesday August the 29th, Hitler communicated to Sir Neville Henderson his reply to the British note. In it he reiterated his demands, but agreed to accept the British Government’s offer of its good offices in securing the dispatch to Berlin of a Polish emissary. In the meantime, it was stated, the German Government would draw up proposals acceptable to itself and would, if possible, place these at the disposal of the British Government before the arrival of the Polish negotiator. Astonishingly enough, for the German proposals were not then even drafted, the note went on to say that the German Government counted on the arrival of the Polish emissary on Wednesday August the 30th, which was the very next day. Sir Neville Henderson pointed out at once that this was an impossible condition, but Hitler assured him that it was only intended to stress the urgency of the matter. On the Wednesday, Hitler’s communication was received by the British Government and their reply was handed by Sir Neville Henderson to von Ribbentrop, the German Foreign Minister, at midnight. At the same time the British Ambassador asked whether the German proposals which were to be drawn up were ready, and suggested that von Ribbentrop should invite the Polish Ambassador to call and should hand to him the proposals for transmission to his government. I would have thought this was a very sensible suggestion. But von Ribbentrop rejected it in violent terms. Von Ribbentrop then produced a lengthy document containing the German proposals, which you subsequently saw in the newspapers, and read it aloud in German at top speed. Sir Neville Henderson naturally asked for a copy of the document but the reply was that it now was too late as the Polish representative had not arrived in Berlin by midnight.

>>18089854
>One further fact should be mentioned and it is this. In the British Government’s communication of August the 30th, it informed the German Chancellor that it recognised the need for speed and that it also recognised the dangers which arose from the fact that two mobilised armies were facing each other on opposite sides of the Polish frontier, and that accordingly, it strongly urged that both Germany and Poland should undertake that during the negotiations no aggressive military movements would take place. That being communicated to Poland, the Polish Government on Thursday August the 31st, categorically stated that it was prepared to give a formal guarantee that during negotiations Polish troops would not violate the frontiers provided a corresponding guarantee was given by Germany. The German Government made no reply whatever.

>My comments on these events need not be very long. The matter was admirably stated by the British Prime Minister to the House of Commons in these words: 'It is plain therefore that Germany claims to treat Poland as in the wrong because she had not by Wednesday night entered upon discussions with Germany about a set of proposals of which she had never heard.’

>Let me elaborate this a little. You can make an offer of settlement for two entirely different purposes. You may make your offer genuinely and hoping to have it accepted or discussed with a view to avoiding war. On the other hand, you may make it, hoping to use it as window dressing and with no intention or desire to have it accepted. If I were to make an offer to my neighbour about a piece of land in dispute between us, and before he had had the faintest opportunity of dealing with my offer, I’ve violently assaulted him, my offer would stand revealed as a fraud.

Bob Menzies is a great orator. And probably a stronger anti-communist than Churchill was. FDR was lucky Labor was in government during Yalta.

>>18087928
>6 million
>merchant
>civilians
Lol.

>>18087893 (OP)
In reality chudcels sit quietly in the back of the class and hope they won't get bullied during the break.

>>18088206
This doesn’t work because the Jews were the aggressors being foreign to Europe

>>18090556
>Jews
Khazars were native to Eastern Europe

>>18090647

>>>/pol/518466555

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518459639/#q518466555

>>18089893
Elaborate.

>>18088188
>dead muslims is.... LE BAD!

>>18090556
You mean like how Germans were the foreign aggressors in France, Belgium , Holland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway etc etc?

>>18087893 (OP)
The good guys lost ww1, not ww2.
In ww2 the nazis were so comically bad it whitewashed Britains crimes. They were the nazis before the nazis.

>>18090771
Altho the Kaiser was not a good guy.
On a state level, Germany was way better than Angland.
On a leadership level; they were all horrible.

>>18087928
Yes but they didn't.
Sadly.

>>18090697
are you even human?

>>18087893 (OP) The answer is simple, but you might not like it. If God was to kill the bad guys there would be no one left in the Kali Yuga.

>>18087893 (OP)
My country right or wrong, so whether or not Germany was right or not in ww2 doesn't matter to me and never has. I stand against nazism and communism because they are foreign not because they are evil.

>>18087893 (OP)
This was probably made by an Amerimutt who doesn't understand the concept of European inter-ethnic conflict.

>>18091980
>European inter-ethnic
Fueled by?

>>18091980
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1760809353476037.mp4

>>18091371
That's a valid point, rabbi.

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1760925463070923.webm

>>18087893 (OP)
>It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?

>>18087928
.

>>18087893 (OP)
>Nazi were the good guys
Why?
>because they Didn't Kill Jews™
What if I don't care about hypothetical dead jews?
>Uhhh they built a good economy
They defaulted on their loans and imprisoned many of their financial backers when they couldn't pay the bills. Socialism doesn't work.
>uhhh well they were a bulwark against bolshevism!
They allied with the soviets.
>but they were gonna free themselves from The Banks™!
Modern nations like those in the 20th century couldn't exist without a central banking or equivalent of a state-backed blockchain. What Germany wanted to was to build their own bank to financially enslave others with. Calling it "Judaism" when England and America impose their economic dominance on others is being deliberately obtuse.

That pretty much covers all the relevant copes. All that's left is the thirdies who bitch about Winston Churchill every day.

>>18088621
>chuds are chickenhawks
are they? they seem to be producing a lot of ShooterBVLLs

>>18092071
it's one thing to just shoot some school because you don't get pussy and the other to actually do something about your political ideology

>>18091162
Dead mudslimes is a good thing regardless of if they are killed by the Synagogue of Satan or not.
The Jews will have their turn.
Let them fight.

>>18087893 (OP)
>ww2
>"good guys"
I genuinely don't see how any of these are morally better than others.

>>18093466
Uhhhh brownxisters????