>>18091664 (OP)
This is good question, unlike your other Tatar hate threads. They should have contributed, as they've always had fairly large population, long chain of states (starting from Volga Bulgaria) etc. My guess is that it has to be Russian cancer, tainting their intellectual capacity.
White countries need to remove those ugly mutts, they're worse that churkas, at least churkas have more European genetic affinity and they don't have those horrible asiatic features.
>>18091967
Stalin "deported" the Crimean "Tartars", but all this achieved was successfully genociding the Tauridians of Southern Crimea, who along with being fully racially European, were semi-Christian. Everytime you see a Crimean Tartar of white visage you are seeing the remnant of the indigenous Tauridians, a mixture of Greeks, Goths, and Genoese.
>>18092002
I remember when people thought picrelated was hapa because she was 1/4 tatars and neotenous. She's at most 10% mong, hapas are ugly and Mexican-looking mutts like Nogais, Bashkirs and Western Hapas are the proof.
Fun fact: half-Japanese, half-Iberian, was used for comedy characters to mock South Americans. He looks like an average Crimean Tatar; all hapas are honorary Mexicans.