← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 18095641

25 posts 4 images /his/
Anonymous No.18095641 [Report] >>18095660 >>18095675 >>18095772 >>18095797 >>18096882 >>18096981
The Civil Rights act was an unconstitutional expansion of federal power and had no basis in the enumerated powers of congress
Anonymous No.18095660 [Report] >>18096018
>>18095641 (OP)
It was 60 years ago. You lost, chuddite.
Anonymous No.18095675 [Report] >>18096018
>>18095641 (OP)
You're not going to force blacks to live on plantations, sorry.
Anonymous No.18095772 [Report] >>18095787 >>18095790
>>18095641 (OP)
Even back then no one ever doubted that, they considered it an expediency to prevent the communist countries from funding black militant groups.
Anonymous No.18095787 [Report] >>18095793 >>18096907
>>18095772
So the republicans agreed with the democrats to hand the cities over to the blacks as reparations? Meanwhile they opened US borders and legalized all the illegals?
Anonymous No.18095790 [Report]
>>18095772
basically, Jim Crow was being used by the communist cunts as propaganda and it also looked back to our European allies
Anonymous No.18095793 [Report] >>18095806 >>18095810
>>18095787
There's no connection there. Slavery is an open borders policy. Civil rights applies to citizens and not illegals.
Anonymous No.18095797 [Report] >>18095803
>>18095641 (OP)
The Constitution is a rag!
What the hell is the point of a constitution if it's so vaguely worded judges can change the entire interpretation every other decade
Either rewrite the Constitution to be CLEAR or stop bitching
Anonymous No.18095803 [Report]
>>18095797
>t. nonAmerican communist tranny
you've never read the constitution
Anonymous No.18095806 [Report] >>18095810
>>18095793
Civil rights and open borders are part of the same legislative package shuttled through with lbj
Anonymous No.18095810 [Report] >>18095818
>>18095806
>>18095793
he's conflating amnesty with the 1965 immigration law that allowed thirdies into the US
Anonymous No.18095812 [Report]
Jim Crow was never going to survive the post-WW2 world anyway.
Anonymous No.18095818 [Report]
>>18095810
it didn't "allow thirdies", it gave tens of millions of them mass amnesty, there's a reason they never talk about it
Anonymous No.18096018 [Report] >>18096907
>>18095660
>>18095675
Wrong, trannies. Donald Trump is literally overthrowing democracy as we speak. Tick tock.
Anonymous No.18096882 [Report]
>>18095641 (OP)
yes
Anonymous No.18096907 [Report] >>18096919 >>18096953
>>18095787
>Meanwhile they opened US borders and legalized all the illegals?
Ronald Reagan wasn't a Democrat.
>>18096018
>the 40% brown and black ICE agents working for a bonus will bring about my ethnostate
/pol/tranny cope
Anonymous No.18096919 [Report] >>18096999
>>18096907
Ronald McDonald is pointed at as causing california to become an irradiated wasteland full of subhuman indios from the butthole of latin america because he was elected governor in california when the federal government gave spics mass amnesty

makes sense according to 80 IQ beaners and jews and socialists
Anonymous No.18096953 [Report] >>18096999
>>18096907
>Ronald Reagan wasn't a Democrat.
he's talking about the 1965 immigration law that allowed thirdies and browns to enter the US for basically the first time ever. it's where the
>le 56% meme
comes from because before the 1965 law the US was 86% white
Anonymous No.18096981 [Report] >>18097025
>>18095641 (OP)
Freedom of association was violated by allowing non whites into white places. Its outrageous and I'm never going to get over it.
Anonymous No.18096999 [Report] >>18097012 >>18097025
>>18096919
I'm pretty sure Ronald Reagan was president when mass amnesty happened in the late 80s. You need to update your script Ivan.
>>18096953
The 1965 immigration act put restrictions in place like required sponsors and legal fees. The only special provisions (added later) were exceptions for Asians fleeing communism in southeast Asia. Immigration was even less controlled on the southern border than before 1965.
Anonymous No.18097012 [Report] >>18097017
>>18096999
>mass amnesty
>13 years after mass amnesty
yeah okay you historically illiterate brown
Anonymous No.18097017 [Report]
>>18097012
15*
Anonymous No.18097025 [Report] >>18097034
>>18096981
it's not just that. it's the bullshit interstate commerce argument
>no eating a sandwich is interstate commerce
>>18096999
no, you communist cocksucker faggot. before 1965 only white people could move into the US. the 1965 law eased immigration restrictions on nonwhites for the first time since the chinese exclusion act and encouraged nonwhites to enter the US through shit like the diversity lottery and family chain migration
Anonymous No.18097034 [Report] >>18097070
>>18097025
before 1965 illegal immigration without naturalization, meaning they were in the US for multiple generations but weren't legally citizens, was commonplace. the 1965 immigration and nationality act granted these tens and tens of millions of illegals in the US birthright citizenship, despite that being something reserved for slaves.

Before 1890, when the federal government started regulating immigration and created places like ellis island, ports like NYC were a revolving door of illegal immigration where they would be shipped to the interior of the US without knowing english or a trade. More often than not states deported these people back to NYC or the coast
Anonymous No.18097070 [Report]
>>18097034
the 1965 immigrations act was also written by Emanuel Celler, jewish democrat from new york city with the explicit goal of getting rid of the "discriminatory" quota system
weird how it's always the jews and always the dems