>>18099591
>Why country poor thread
We've had this thread a billion times.
Argentina ran out of farmland and other nations grew on tourism and other sources.
North Korea is poor because it lacks a port.
Argentina had no real immigration and although goyslop did affect it the goyslop explanation is against his, as his advocates obesity.
It's stupid to ask why countries are poor and instead you should ask why rich. Argentina was rich initially on resources that saturated. It's population grew and also topsoil declined. Together these reduced crop value. Crop prices increased but not enough.
Ultimately, it's density. The nog explanation at density are compatible as common time trends. It's just that his is a retard board and isn't aware of density.
In Argentinas case as it was resources driven it's very clear density was the issue. The sole cause. But also the framing of the question is wrong and the real issue is that it just ran out of resources.
>Why country poor thread
We've had this thread a billion times.
Argentina ran out of farmland and other nations grew on tourism and other sources.
North Korea is poor because it lacks a port.
Argentina had no real immigration and although goyslop did affect it the goyslop explanation is against his, as his advocates obesity.
It's stupid to ask why countries are poor and instead you should ask why rich. Argentina was rich initially on resources that saturated. It's population grew and also topsoil declined. Together these reduced crop value. Crop prices increased but not enough.
Ultimately, it's density. The nog explanation at density are compatible as common time trends. It's just that his is a retard board and isn't aware of density.
In Argentinas case as it was resources driven it's very clear density was the issue. The sole cause. But also the framing of the question is wrong and the real issue is that it just ran out of resources.
