>>18103278
It's not about population numbers, it's about age profile.
A growing population is a young population. A declining population is an old population. This is simply a mathematical fact.
The elderly consume the vast majority of healthcare resources. The ratio between working people and elderly can swing wildly and cause a huge burden on the working.
The worst part is, the more elderly dependents each working person has to support, the less surplus resources those working people have available to put towards children (who are of course also a healthcare-draining dependent class). So the problem compounds on itself.
People imagine that technology is going to magically fix these problems, but what technology is going to replace elder nursing? And insofar as medical technology gets better, that just increases the problem as the elderly live longer.
Besides, as the population gets older, you probably also lose some of the drive, risk-taking, and inspiration that leads to technological development in the first place.
Most of these issues could be solved if we just killed the elderly. But Im not sure that's possible. I have half a mind to think that the coof was exactly that, a chinese project to kill off some of their elderly.
The other issue is that this low birth rate trend seems to be hitting every country in pretty close correlation to how highly developed they are. So in the long term we have an idiocracy situation where the future is increasingly filled with retarded niggers instead of intelligent whites and chinks. And even if some of the niggers somehow become developed and intelligent, those are precisely the niggers that will have low birth rates while the most retarded ones get more and more prominent. Seems a fucking horrible omen for the long term future of humanity. Honestly this last bit is such a serious problem, I wonder if it's one of the Great Filters.
>>18103304
This issue is pretty minor in the grand scheme of things.