Thread 18104835

Why did Muhammed PBUH (Pajeets Bust Upon Him) let Pajeets bust upon him?

>>18104835 (OP)
allah is the best of planners

Wasn't it said that they didn't have any visible genitalia.
How did Zutts bust nuts in prophet's butt?

>>18104835 (OP)
Allahu a'alam, fellow mzuttslim

>>18104835 (OP)
It was a different time.

>>18104867
Look, it's worse if you go the jinn route.
Jinns are canonically made of smokeless fire.

>>18104867
>they had no clothes on, and I did not see their private parts at all. They had very little flesh. Then they came and started riding on the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
What's worse is that what I'm copying right now is a mistranslation. The "on" preposition isn't present in Arabic, which means that the source I'm quoting is committing shirk by modifying a binding hadith — as it is a part of the Sahih al Bukhari, no matter whether or not it's considered strong or weak, especially since other narrations by Ibn Mas’ūd were considered strong, except this one, for no other reason that because it demeans Mohammad.

>>18105198
Shit, no, it's not Bukhari, it's Musnad Imām Ahmad. The rest of Ibs Masud's narrations are still considered strong, so Islamic jurists arbitrarily declare it weak because it did not align with their recounting of Mohammad's life

>>18104835 (OP)
ZUT ALORS !!
this is the best
http://www.google.com/search?q=prophet+of+doom+craig+winn

>>18105198
What makes you think that the word "riding" would have been commonly used as a euphemism for fucking someone in Arabic? It's not even an immediately obvious euphemism since riding also implies that you're moving towards some destination and you don't tend to walk while you fuck people. You have to establish that the English euphemism you're super-imposing applied to the dialect of the Hadith narrator. Anyway, Lisan al-Arab already claims that "rakiba" can take an accusative to mean "to accompany," likely as a semantic extension of the first meaning, so this is just silly.

>>18104835 (OP)
Truth is: he wanted to be Zutted.

Are pajeets made of smokeless fire?

>>18105322
there are other classic Arabic texts where the word means sex

I was curious about secular or non-islamic scholarship on that hadith. The closest I could find was pic related who is an Israeli scholar of hadith who commented on the issue. I think this anon here >>18105322 is probably right, people are basically imposing an english euphemism on the classical arabic.

>>18105322
>there are other classic Arabic texts where the word means sex
such as?

>>18105476
>such as?
I think he means this one
>“A woman may be compared to a cow, horse, or camel—for all are ridden": تفسير القرطبي الجامع لأحكام القرآن (Tafsir al-Qurtubi, v.15, p.172).

>>18105492
thats hilarious

ZUTTED.COM

>>18105198
>>they had no clothes on, and I did not see their private parts at all. They had very little flesh. Then they came and started riding on the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.

"did not see" b/c they could not see b/c their Jeet pp's were just as tiny and made of just as "little flesh" as they are today. It's scientific fact that Jeets have both the smallest brains and pp's, this simply confirms that this has always been so, and is in no way a modern phenomenon.