>>18116521
How does that follow? I said procreation is the human calling, and promoting a lifestyle incapable of it to children is wrong.
The moral wrong isn't an individual not procreating. It is an entire class that, precisely because it contributes nothing to the birthrate, accumulates disproportionate wealth, time, and influence, and uses that to further their joint class interests against the normal populace.
This is how they pushed transgenderism through legislation. While normal people work to raise children, childless degenerate activists with dual-incomes and nothing but time promote and advocate their degenerate class interests. Which includes expanding their population and loosening morals to push degeneracy further into areas like transgenderism.
>>18116780
Yeah, I said that they perpetuate their orientation through molestation. That's the same thing as 'adoption'. It's interesting that in the television and film propaganda designed to normalize 'gay adoption' it overwhelmingly depicts gay men adopting girls. But in reality gay men always adopt boys. It's interesting.
And 'reproduction technology'? You mean surrogacy? An moral wrong that subverts the nature order to use women in poverty as breeding cattle? Great technology.
There are solutions, but first homosexuals would have to accept that being a homosexual is an objective negative in all lives that should never be promoted to children. Then we can start talking about something like mentorship with homosexuals contributing financially to their closest relatives children, being guardians for their nieces and providing them with dowries. But for a majority of homosexuals, they are not interested if it doesn't grant them access to a young boy.
