>>18119228
>What image really needs explanation?
It appears as though all three images are indicative of industrial murder. And if not, what are they of?
>It was a camp. People though not murdered did die of natural caused
True.
>Sometimes massacres in the east occurred. And?
The whole war was a massacre. 60 million or so total died, at least half of those being in the east. I'm just focused on this one part involving specifically allegedly about a tenth of that total.
>Its obvious because you can't even disagree.
What is obvious? disagree with what?
>Poland was getting ready to attack
What do you mean? Germany invaded poland because they did attack on august 31st, at a radio tower in german occupied bohemia and moravia. Do you mean they were planning on invading germany proper? i would love to see a source of this, because ive never seen anything like it
and it was harming germans.
>Poles were assholes that thought they has a right to Danzig
Any country at all is just a claim of a right to rule. Whether Germans deserved Danzig or not, who cares? Its not like they only took Danzig which was the only place in Poland with a sizeable german population. No they went straight for warsaw. Why do you think that is? Are those the actions of a country trying to defend their land and their diaspora community? maybe
>even though they could still get sea access.
Explain
>Where's your face?
What do you mean