>>18139637
Him being a great poet&writer is the main reason why he ever was famous. At least outside of Germany.
Though I never thought of describing Latin Americans as more artistic than technical or emotive. It's a current tendency in Spic, thought, admittedly. Though I would not say it is necessarily an inborn tendency.
>Spengler was interested in the new discoveries of the ime done by american researchers on precolombian cultures but he recognized he didn't have enough available information to extensively write about him.
Yes. His interest on them was lifelong. And it is tragic he was born too early to see Maya deciphered (which I'm sure he would ascribe to nascent Russian genius). Though I think had he lived longer he'd have entered into conflict with common Mayanist scholarship at the time. He was the more correct one of the two, ironically.
>I wonder what his reflection would be on the Inca state,
The flowering last state of a Peruvian culture. Which he did allude to once or twice in Decline.
> in the core of their main cities and the rest is untamed territory
The cities are untamed territory also. You should not try to dialecticize it. Our (spics, I mean) favourite categories of Civilization and Barbarity are just two sides of the same coin.
> the imported maoists trained in Lima's capital and the peruvian farmers, god-fearing, cooperativists not by Marx teaching but by cultural tradition.
I would, strangely enough, argue the ""real"" 'Latin Americans' are the Maoists. In Spengler terms the Peasants of the Andes (and Mexican indigenous too) are Fellaheen. The Peruvian culture passed over a long time ago. They are basically like plants.
Aside from that, it has to be remarked that Indian genocide is storied Latin American cultural tradition dating to the viceroyalties.cont
>>18140090
In the end Spengler would probably firmly class them as primitives, slim chance of them even being part of the Russian Pre-culture.
All the signs point to them being primitives.