← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 18143717

17 posts 8 images /his/
Anonymous No.18143717 [Report] >>18143724 >>18143726 >>18143861 >>18143978 >>18144422 >>18145008 >>18145312
How come the largest empire in human history couldn't conquer India? Did they fear the smell?
Anonymous No.18143722 [Report] >>18143729
Anonymous No.18143724 [Report]
>>18143717 (OP)
There was no "India" back then.
Anonymous No.18143726 [Report] >>18143964
>>18143717 (OP)
No it was because India was heavily forested and war elephants. Mongols only worked well in open steppe or desert terrain.
they got btfo by the Vietnamese when they tried fighting in the jungle and against war elephants.
Anonymous No.18143729 [Report] >>18143733
>>18143722
This is really dumb the Mughals had almost nothing to do with the Mongols.
Anonymous No.18143733 [Report] >>18143874
>>18143729
What is the origin of the word "Mughal?"
Anonymous No.18143813 [Report]
Delhi Sultanate at the time was not a weak state. Admittedly the Mongols had conquered stronger ones but those were closer to Mongolia and had better terrain.
Anonymous No.18143861 [Report]
>>18143717 (OP)
Dense jungles, really big fucking mountains, severe humidity. Geography made it extremely difficult and not worthwhile. Delhi was also powerful but were it not for those geographical issues, I doubt that would have stopped them.
Anonymous No.18143874 [Report] >>18143915 >>18144371
>>18143733
>What is the origin of the word "Mughal?"
That doesn't mean anything only that way back there were some Turco-Mongol elites that intermarried into Indian nobility that's all it means.
Picrel was a Mughal and he looks like a regular northern indian.
Anonymous No.18143915 [Report]
>>18143874
Something tells me you get really offended when shown videos of cows getting slaughtered.
Anonymous No.18143964 [Report]
>>18143726
this is incorrect
the Mongols easily conquered Yunnan and Guangxi in China which are also heavily forested, humid, and full of big mountains
Mongols also excelled at enslaving and converting newly conquered troops to their side, to the extent that many of their armies in China were majority Chinese
Anonymous No.18143978 [Report]
>>18143717 (OP)
Overextension plus weather
Anonymous No.18144371 [Report]
>>18143874
He has clearly slanted eyes. Compare wirh persian art that time.
Anonymous No.18144422 [Report] >>18145324
>>18143717 (OP)
>defeated Alexander
>defeated the mongols
Why is the poojeet menace so OP?
Anonymous No.18145008 [Report]
>>18143717 (OP)
http://www.google.com/search?q=toilet+witches+india

http://www.google.com/search?q=codex+pajeet

http://www.amazon.in/s?k=cow+dung+cakes
Anonymous No.18145312 [Report]
>>18143717 (OP)
Why would you want to get dysentary in a jeet-infested jungle with a bunch of dalits, when you could be riding free on the Steppe with a milk-skinned, almond-eyed Hapa by your side as you drive you enemies before you and hear the lamentations fo their women?

No contest, Saar.
Anonymous No.18145324 [Report]
>>18144422

>defeated by Alexander(see: BMAC, all Indici writing, et. al.). His men practiced Democracy and voted to return to their own country and families, and their wise leader agreed. No one BASED Greek Chud would ever choose to stay in Jeetistan and pound poo pud.

>Mongols can't horse in a jungle, or horse in a forest, that's why they lost against all "Indo-Europeans", and various other reasons.


India has never fought and won a war against any form of "White" person ever. On the contrary, their entire culture, religion and language is the story of being conquered and set into caste by White, their superiors, always, now and forever more.

They will NEVER be White.