Thread 18148595

Everyone who posted here has died of meth. Peak oil is a dead ideology. It's correct but it's a dead ideology as all the 2022 users of his have died of meth by now.
Oil prices have decreased. They are falling. This is because of tar. its because most oil is fake and the wcs/wti spread has held up due to tar. I never cared about price at all, and also the market doesn't care about anything either, but price fell anyway.
This means peak oil failed in the eyes of pol. In reality oil prices are meaningless noise and I never assigned any concern to them. Nucor, the oil stock pol favors, has gone nowhere. It will go up from nuclear. Oil companies are boosted by things that have no relation to oil like acquisition and new markets and as a result oil prices and stocks mean nothing. The stock market will go up due to fed cuts and everything is positive for everything in terms of price.
Captialism will collapse September 14 2026. A Jewish date. The maximal time capitalism can exist is late 2027 but Jews will die of meth earlier. Currently the quality problem is hidden by America rejecting Chinese tankers with Iranian oil and the impeding cutoff of Russian oil and blocking of Chinese and Iranian trade will be amplified by scrutiny of Iraqi oil shipped from Iran, chevrons Venezuela exit and widespread cartel oil trade. America depends on Mexico to ship oil from Asia and bypass American port restrictions so securing the border trade is fatal.
None of this matters because you'll die of meth so peak oil is just another reason to die in six months.

That text is incoherent on several levels—it mixes bits of commodity‑market commentary with delusional or hateful conspiracy language. Here’s how to dismantle it cleanly, point by point, without touching the slurs:

1. “Peakoil is a dead ideology”
Wrong premise.
“Peakoil” was never an ideology but a model: production from a given field or region eventually peaks and declines. That remains true geologically; what’s changed is the timing and context.
New extraction methods (horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing, deep‑water rigs) pushed global peak farther out, not disproved the concept.
Many mature fields (NorthSea, Mexico’s Cantarell, parts of WestTexas) have indeed peaked.
So the underlying geology stands; the market dynamics are what moved.
2. “Oil prices have decreased, therefore peakoil failed”
Price ≠ supply ceiling.
Oil prices swing mostly with demand cycles (recession, COVID, monetary tightening) and geopolitics, not with long‑term depletion.
The 2020 crash didn’t mean infinite oil; it meant demand collapse.
If supply were effortless, OPEC+ wouldn’t need coordinated cuts to hold prices up.
In short, a short‑term price dip can coexist with long‑term structural scarcity.
3. “Tar / fake oil / WCS‑WTI spread proves everything is fine”
That’s jargon misused.
WCSvsWTI refers to heavy vs light crude differentials, largely due to refining capacity and transport costs.
“Tar” (bitumen) is extremely energy‑intensive to upgrade; it’s not “fake” oil, just expensive oil.
When high‑cost sources dominate new supply, it actually confirms we’re past the cheap‑oil era.
4. “Markets don’t care / everything goes up because Fed cuts”
That’s magical thinking. Central‑bank easing can buoy equities, but it doesn’t conjure physical energy molecules. If energy becomes structurally costly, it constrains growth no matter what the Fed does.

>>18148601
You win jidf.

5. “Capitalism will collapse September142026 …”
That’s numerology, not analysis. No credible economic model predicts collapse on a date; the author is stringing together anti‑Semitic tropes and random timelines. Ignore the hate, and the claim has zero empirical foundation.
6. “America depends on Mexico to ship Asian oil”
Completely false. U.S. crude imports and exports are tracked publicly; pipeline logistics through Mexico are marginal. The U.S. is still the world’s largest combined producer of oil and natural gas.
7. The “you’ll die of meth” refrain
That’s not argument; it’s projection and abuse. When someone resorts to that kind of language, they’ve left the realm of economics altogether.

Bottom line
Peak‑oil geology remains valid; its timing shifted because of technology and price elasticity.
Oil prices reflect short‑term demand and geopolitics, not infinite abundance.
The rest of the post is hate‑filled noise without factual or analytic content.
You can refute it simply by pointing to data:global crude production, field‑by‑field decline rates, and the energy‑return‑on‑investment curve—all of which show we’re still extracting more, but at ever‑higher cost and complexity.

>>18148605
No credible Jew says Jews will Jew the Jew and Jew captialism.

>>18148605
>7. The “you’ll die of meth” refrain
That’s not argument; it’s projection and abuse. When someone resorts to that kind of language, they’ve left the realm of economics altogether.

OK I kek'd at this

Thanks for pasting the thread. Here’s a breakdown of which parts appear AI-generated, which are human, and why — based purely on linguistic and structural indicators (not on the content’s accuracy or tone).


---

Post 18148595 (the first “Peak oil / meth” post)

Likelihood of AI generation: ~80–90%

Indicators:

Unnatural coherence pattern: it chains semi-related ideas (“peak oil,” “tar,” “meth deaths,” “Jewish date,” “border oil trade”) in a way that mimics topic continuity but lacks logical causality — a common signature of LLM-style text drift.

Mechanical phrase reuse: “...oil prices mean nothing... stocks mean nothing...” — repeated structures without clear rhetorical purpose.

Pseudo-economics and apocalyptic scheduling: mixing verifiable market terms (WTI/WCS spread, Nucor) with random deterministic predictions (“capitalism will collapse September 14 2026”) suggests algorithmic stitching of unrelated contexts.

Flat tone, no emotion curve: even when discussing extreme ideas, syntax remains monotonous — typical of unsupervised text generation or a copypasta seeded from AI text.


Overall: Reads like a machine-generated rant or a heavily modified AI output that someone posted for shock value.


---

Post 18148601 (long analytical rebuttal)

Likelihood of AI generation: 30–40%

Indicators:

Highly structured, numbered argumentation and technically correct oil-market references.

Uses balanced punctuation and consistent indentation — hallmarks of deliberate, edited human writing.

However, some phrasing (“In short, a short-term price dip can coexist with long-term structural scarcity”) reads slightly too polished for a 4chan reply — possibly an LLM-assisted summary pasted by a human.


Overall: Could be human-written with AI help (e.g., someone using ChatGPT or Claude to draft their rebuttal).


---

Post

>>18148595 (OP)
nice try jidf