>>18155539
>Ancient and recent admixture can be easily differentiated
globetrotter is useless guesswork, actual samples form actual studies about ancient genetics have shown that most of the nafri ancestry in iberia is from the roman empire, there's almost no difference in percentage of nafri ancestry between late roman empire, visigothic and muslim south iberia
for the record, i don't give a fuck about brown shitberian trannies, but i'm getting tired of you spreading misinformation about most of the nafri ancestry being from al andalus in every thread, based on some useless 2019 globetrotter predictions, therefore absolving the semitic brown shithole christcuck state known as the roman empire which was actually responsible for the browning of all of southern europe and the balkans
>In addition to the Eastern Mediterranean influence, a North African genetic component became prominent in the Roman period, as reflected in a shift of sampled Iberian individuals toward the PCA space occupied by North Africans (Figure 1C; yellow polygon). Previous work detected North African ancestry during the Roman period in four individuals from one site in Granada (southeast Mediterranean area) (Olalde et al., 2019). We now document this signal ranging from 3-66% of ancestry in all the newly reported Roman-Period individuals (n=32) from this area, excavated at three different urban sites covering the coast (ancient Malaca and ancient Baria) and the inland (ancient Acinipo), and one rural inland site, Coracho Basilica close to present-day Lucena (Córdoba).
>In the Central Iberian Plateau, we detect it in 6 Late Antiquity sites ranging from 4-85% (with only five individuals out of 29 without any North African signal, Table S5).
