Page 10 Already Edition?

Previous Thread >>5039432

So years ago someone on Deviantart had a photo, I think their name was ktantan or something?

One of their pics was a HR close up shot of a woman in a bra, and in her cleavage was a shrunk guy.

Anyone got that pic? You'd be doing me a solid

Sorry for the request, here's a hot giant woman

>>5078281
It's fun knowing that Dodger got a kick out of these collages.

>>5078281
>>5078804

I wonder if any of the women who discover collages of themselves ever notice the destruction effects and actually think of the implied human cost of their fictional giant existence.

I imagine most probably just think, "Thats impressive photoshop work!" and move on.

>>5078817
Susu definitely liked the craftsmanship of it all, and decided to run with it

>>5078817
Wonder what Bella would say

>>5078804
Wait really? sauce? I've only seen the one with jessica nigri

>>5079100
I forget but she was using >>5078281 as a conference call picture because she thought it was funny.

>>5079100
>Wait really? sauce?
Back in 2020, Dodger and some friends did some D&D streams called "Die-Kea". She didn't have access to a webcam during one of these sessions, so, somehow, she stumbled upon >>5078281's pic related, thought it had good energy for the Die-Kea session, and used it in place of her webcam. You can see it if you scrub through this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dUrVdOeaUg

Someone asked about the pic on Dodger's next stream, and she gave a few comments:
https://youtu.be/aCU750AS_-o?si=q71UVcYUTi1tsskP&t=500 (Starts at 8:20)

And a few years later, she talked about it again:
https://youtu.be/HRLYCiQEVe8?si=y_BvMlJcJQViT0VX&t=2658 (Starts at 44:18)

Nothing too dramatic. She obviously understands the context of the Photoshops, but she thinks they're funny and well made.

Finished a new Rebecca Black piece.

>>5079476
Very lovely. The composition just *works*

>>5079476
Imagine a giantess destroying a city with a giant gun instead of smashing buildings with her body.

>>5079669
Her sole is suspiciously clean... get to work!

>>5078817
>I imagine most probably just think, "Thats impressive photoshop work!" and move on.
They probably think that it's weird and cringe that we get off to them being gigantic and laying waste to cities. That being said, because many girls post pictures of themselves on social media, there won't ever be a lack of girls to collage, and the best part about it imo is that with the poses girls do, the collages make it seem as though they enjoy their new size and power.

A hot girl at work told me she'd eat me if we were trapped on a desert island together.

>>5080348
Happy for you, anon

>>5080058
>They probably think that it's weird and cringe that we get off to them being gigantic and laying waste to cities.
Even with the increasing visibility of "internet fetishes", I doubt that most people are conscious of the giantess fetish, at least not enough to identify it casually. In isolation, most of the pics posted in this thread would come off as "lol funny/creative fan art" to most people, and be forgotten in a second. They'd probably need the extra context (e.g., associated comments, checking the artist's profile to see that it's full of giant women, etc) to realise the fetishistic angle. It's all in the context.

>>5080570

>>5080348
lucky bastard

>>5080058
I have never heard of any e-girl who was aware of her being turned into a giantess not like or or not at least be amused by it. Literally nobody finds it cringe. If girls were ever large they would eat you and crush everything and not find this cringe

>>5080570
I imagine that, as far as "Internet fetishes" are concerned, the most prevalent one is foot fetishism, which itself is kind of linked to this fetish anyway. Normies who see giantess images are likely seeing them as part of weird Japanese commercials and probably just see giantess stuff as something aesthetic rather than fetishistic.
>>5080611
>E-girls
I'm talking about normal girls, like the kinds you would meet at school, work, a bar, etc. Tell those kinds of girls you would fap to collages of them as giantesses destroying cities and killing people, and let me know how they respond.
>If girls were ever large they would eat you and crush everything and not find this cringe
Look, I wish that were true as much as the next degenerate fetishist would, but that's simply not true for most girls.

>>5080611
It's all context.
E-girls well versed in brainrot and the bizarre underbelly of the world (see: any fucking thing that merits a 4chan thread) see the amusing parts, artistic talent, etc.
'Normal' women who aren't terminally online consistently react poorly to any fetish they don't consider normal or don't have themselves. IE choking the shit out of a girl is 'normal' so it's fine. Something more esoteric like size generally either makes her think you're a freak (getting the 'ick' as kids call it) or that you secretly aren't into her or are gay or something.
I have reams of anecdotal evidence for this over the years. Do not make the mistake of thinking this will be a thing your average woman will find acceptable until it becomes socially lauded or something.
Like Beyonce admits to a giantess fetish we'll be fine. Until then, tread lightly if you value your relationships.

>>5080771
>tread lightly if you value your relationships.

also very good advice for any giant women

>normal girls, like the kinds you would meet at school, work, a bar, etc. Tell those kinds of girls you would fap to collages of them as giantesses destroying cities and killing people, and let me know how they respond.

Gotta start small, no pun intended. Simpler probing questions/scenarios like: wwyd with a Shrunken boss/ex/person you hate yadda yadda....whats someplace you hate and would like to rage out and destroy, or step on your woekplace,etc. Then maybe if they like the imagination and see you enjoy it too they would be more open.

I bet it would definitely help if they were already an "I step on all spiders and bugs" type of girl.

>>5080971
I think you need to get your head examined if you think you can slowly get a normie girl to even entertain the idea of her being a giantess and killing people. The only girls who would entertain that idea are psychopaths and/or sociopaths. Normie girls would only entertain being giantesses if they're using their new size to help people.

>>5081032
>Normie girls would only entertain being giantesses if they're using their new size to help people.

I don't see the problem

>>5081036
Aren't most people in this thread fapping to cruel giantesses?

>>5081045
Yes.

>>5078005 (OP)
I accidentally clicked on the link to this board, not even in catalog view, first thread. How did you know I need more GIANTESSES in my life? Made my morning. Thank you.

>>5080570
She didn't do ANY stomping WTF!!! I couldn't be more mad and my morning is now ruined.

>>5081076
It's a little island in the sea of slop.

>>5081092
Not to take the moral high ground, but I honestly feel that gooning to giant girls is morally better than gooning to celebrities.

Did anyone else like the part of the new Jurassic World movie where ScarJo grew to the size of the dinosaurs?

>>5082562
I wish that happened, it might have made the movie actually good.

>>5082647

We Giantess enjoyers need to organize infiltrate Hollywood and use the million dollar budgets towards making giant woman movies

>>5082714
Speaking of, is that AOTFFW remake still coming?

>>5082775
Last I saw, Tim Burton released a statement where he said like "lol wut, I've got no solid plans for whatever my future project will be", and it has been quiet for months since. All we know is that a script was being written, but there has been no word on whether it will actually be picked up or not.

>>5082775
>>5082963
It'll happen. Remakes of 50's drive-in garbage IP is a creative dead end Hollywood hasn't sucked the marrow from yet.

>>5082970
I feel the exact opposite.

Nobody gives a shit about Attack of the 50ft Woman. The poster/title has some pop-culture relevance, but that's all, there is zero interest in the movie among the wider public. And look at >>5082562. Hollywood has no need to "suck the marrow" from shit literally nobody cares (or knows) about. They're still making bank by shitting out a fifteenth Jurassic World movie.

Even considering Tim Burton, it's hard to imagine the movie going ahead. He's just had his first real successes in decades with the Wednesday and Bettlejuice 2 projects. I imagine him (and his company) will be more interested in pushing in that direction rather than making a 90 degree turn for a weird 50s throwback project.

>>5083000
I have to say that I both agree and disagree with you. I feel as though there's no interest from the general public in giantess movies because there haven't really been any that have been made recently. I don't watch many movies, but I think "Monsters vs. Aliens" is the one of the few explicit giantess movies. Nowadays, the only movies that are released are live-action Disney slop movies and another new Marvel movie. If a proper giantess movie were released and flopped hard, then I think your argument would have more merit. That being said, if a proper giantess movie has been made before and flopped, you can disregard my argument.

>>5083158
with the amount of buzz Monsters vs Aliens has been getting on twitter (albeit via B.O.B.), I wouldn't be surprised if Hollywood execs toy with the idea of a sequel or a live action remake. or maybe I'm just an optimistic size guy

>>5083000
All they have to do is remake Jurassic World but instead of disgusting lizards, make the monsters sexy girls. You can change almost nothing else from the plot

https://x.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1947467208080400418

Have some lies and clickbait.

>>5087573
I'm still skeptical about the movie going ahead at all, but I will say that it's interesting that the rumor is specific about the involvement of various production companies. It's not like your typical MCU-tier rumors where people are just throwing around actor's names, there's an extra degree of strangeness to be making up rumors about producer roles and relationships with Robbie's production company. It's also interesting to hear that the Gone Girl writer supposedly won't be continuing after their role with the initial script.

https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/7/21/margot-robbie-to-star-in-tim-burtons-attack-of-the-fifty-foot-woman

Regardless, hopefully this "news" is loud enough to spark a statement from someone closer to the (hypothetical) production. I am hopeful, but skeptical.

>>5082562
What an absolutely bizarre series of choices for the poster here. The raft is bright yellow in the movie, the trex looks very stupid on the poster. And to have a giant sized looking Scarlett johanesson right in the middle? Why? She’s completely irrelevant for the entire movie. And she doesn’t have that much screen time. Probably like 5 minutes. Absolutely bizarre

>>5087573
Speaking of, I guess there's also rumors of adding the Doom Patrol to the new DCCU with their own movie.

>>5088106
Jon 'Bones' Jones played, Cyborg?

I know you're here, so thank you based Docop for once again making them big.

>>5088352
Now where have I seen her before?

>>5082562
It needed a Scarlett Growansson vs D-rex fight at the end. They could have easily injected her with the dna they gathered of the biggest dinos for it to happen