Tiffany Sloan, Miss October 1992

>>5079303 (OP)

>>5079305

>>5079306

>>5079307

>>5079308

Candy Loving, Miss January 1979

>>5079319

>>5079321

>>5079325

>>5079328

Vicki Witt, Miss August 1978

>>5079343

>>5079345

>>5079348

>>5079352

>>5079303 (OP)
she killed herself. lol

>>5079514
I could have saved her

>>5079514
Made mne look it up
www.whosaliveandwhosdead.com/l_pmom.asp

>>5079328
The tanlines and bush are so good

why were tits so better back then

>>5079962
>why
Coupla reasons. Far fewer fake tits. Areola weren't scarred or stretched, you didn't see where the saline/Si bag was sitting under the skin, and boobs wiggled, jiggled, and drooped/formed differently than the at-attention bags inside do.
Also, Playboy had a wide selection of models and they chose the cream of the crop each month.

>>5080067

>>5080506

>>5080507

>>5080508

>>5080509

>>5079994
>Far fewer fake tits
lol. women have been getting fake tits for over 50yrs now and many got them specifically for nude layouts like playboy

>>5080511
Thanks Anon. She came along at a very formative age for me, and has always been top of my centrefold list.

>>5080522
>lol. women have been getting fake tits for over 50yrs now and many got them specifically for nude layouts like playboy
Goddamn you worked hard at being obnoxious.
BTW... when do you think the 70s were? Yeah - 50 years ago. I was there. Fake tits were a novelty. And Playboy did not accept fake tits.

Anyone have a hi-res of Heather Ryan, July 1967?

>>5080619

can i get uhhh Carrie from 1997, sorry forgot her last name

>>5081848
alright, thank you a lot

>>5081848
roblox looking mf

Great thread! Candy Loving is always a welcome sight. Same for Vicki Witt. And Roberta Vasquez's peek-a-bush CF will never not be sexy af to me. Pic: One of my faves, not talked about as much as some more famous PMOMs. Her CF is the only HR pic I have for her unfortunately (true for many of the older Playmates).

>>5083010
>Candy Loving
Non-nude, but damn she's sexy as hell even with all her clothes on.

>>5079303 (OP)
Dianne Chandler. Miss September 1966

>>5079776
Tanlines get me every time man. Its the perfect lingerie.

>>5079962
>old thing good
>new thing bad

>>5079962
>>5085173
I disagree, I think this >>5079994 is closer to the truth.

Playboy was (for a time) the only place a women could pose nude without completely losing her reputation or being seen as a complete whore. So if you posed for Penthouse, you were on the slippery slope; if you posed for Hustler you were probably a street walker; but if you posed for playboy, you suddenly started getting acting roles. Meanwhile, for a long time (especially in the 70's and 80's, playboy attracted already famous actresses who chose that magazine for their first (and often only) nude pictures.

That sort of setup creates a form of artificial selection; where playboy wound up getting it's pick of all the best looking women; who would obviously jump at a chance to pose there instead of other magazines.

(also mentioning that Playboy probably had the best photographers; the kind of old-school types who would spend 30 minutes preparing for a single photograph; while using special old-style large-format cameras).

What the heck is that between their legs? It's so bushy...

>>5086269
Back in the olden days, women didn't have penises.

Bergman count as classic?

>>5087131
I'll allow it.