Thread 7771973

So i was talking with some anons about this tumblr drawing, right? And they said its ugly.

how exactly? The anatomy is okay, the artstyle is okay and there's no bullshit like the infamous tumblr nose. Problemo?

>>7771973 (OP)
I dont find it particularly ugly, its just incomplete because it has no shadows. I like it.

>>7771973 (OP)
Looks demonic and pedophilic. I instinctively hate it.

depends on the context it is seen. imagine seeing it as a tattoo, ugly. on a church wall, ugly. on tumblr? par for the course, in adventure time inspired tv show? probably ok.

>>7771973 (OP)
More bland than anything.

sex

she looks like she fucks human men

>>7771973 (OP)
they don't like it but they aren't precise with their words, so its easier just calling it "ugly"

>no breasts
>no ass
>a fucking tummy
how would you fix this?

>>7772040
>bigger boobs
>bigger ass
>bigger tummy

>>7772066
ok

>>7771975
Something is not "incomplete" because it has no shadows, moron.

>>7771973 (OP)
Explain what attributes the drawing has that make it not-ugly

>>7772614
i dunno it looks cute

Feels like the inside of the thigh/leg should have a paler fur tone like deers do in nature

not ugly, just very amateur, which is fine, but its very clearly drawn by someone whos not all that experienced yet

idk

>>7771973 (OP)
What anons aren't pointing out to you is that she doesn't have a pelvis. Like this bitch is basically a fauna but she goes straight from tummy to legs, no pelvis in sight. Just look up cartoon fauna or centaurs, we should be seeing her bush man. Also while your at it trim the feet to make ot more like hooves, when they are sharp like that it looks like she's constantly tip-toing

aside from the simple artstyle, there's no line weight whatsoever

>>7772837
For this style in particular I think lineweight would bring things down since it break the flow of the simple forms. It definitely lacks detail and a proper use of lines to express form, the right type of hatching and balance between thick and thin line to ground things better it be more beneficial outside normal line weight.

>>7772840
thois

>>7772037
This.
>>7771973 (OP)
It's really a matter of taste, especially with something so deformed/stylised.
I like it, I think it's cute. I'd make the shirt longer though, the lack of visible pelvis makes it look a bit off. I also have a personal preference for long legs.

>>7771973 (OP)
guys this isn't his drawing, it's from 2021. stop giving him free advice

the only thing i would say is particularly ugly about it is that the stubble looks more like leg hair than fur, but that is a valid style

>>7773083
i am just trying to learn from pieces i like and make /v/ review pieces so i can get advice, the pic is from some tumblr chick

OP wanted to shit on the drawing because the person is trans.

>>7772837
>shaky with inconsistent flow
lmao you cant even draw a line properly, embarrassing

>>7771973 (OP)
What anatomy? It's flat, more of a symbolic representation than an accurately portrayed body.

>>7773735
idk they seem pretty fair to the drawing i think youre just making things up

>>7773735
No.

>>7771973 (OP)
is this a very roundabout way to make a dtiys thread

>>7773738
It's a skill I can improve. But you'll always be a faggot

>>7773877
whats that

>>7773970
Dtiys

>>7774009
can someone do it?

>>7774222
nobody draws here, so no

>>7771973 (OP)
Wonky arms, no shape language, wonky line weight, tangent between legs, feet floating in the air

>>7771973 (OP)
Nothings really wrong with it, its simple and straight forward and does what it tries to do.

When someone says a drawings ugly online, usually they mean they dont like the subject matter. Remember most people online are mouth breathing retards and if you draw a pizza they'll say its an ugly drawing simply because they don't like tomatos on pizza.

You COULD draw this with a more 3d form but that wouldn't make the drawing better, its meant to be a flat cartoon but there are people here who would overrender it and give her realistic deer legs while drawing an ungly nose on her face and say "there, fixed it".

>>7774677
Nothing but meme words.

>>7774726
>meme words
art terminology

I think the original is messy without taking advantage of it. My work is not much better, but at least I put some energy and dynamism in my wonky lines

>>7775335
this is adorable

>>7775335
Nice

>>7775335
really nice anon, super cute

>>7775335
Honestly really cute

>>7775352
>>7775373
>>7775954
>>7775961
Thanks guys!

>>7775335
nice but you drew it with straightoid sensibilities so you missed the point.

>>7776608
My brother in Christ what the fuck is "straightoid sensibility"?

It’s not ugly it just has clearly amateur aspects like lack of hair direction or cohesion, tangent lines (where the legs meet under the shirt), and non studied proportions. Also people who draw in that style are usually amateurs to begin with.

>>7776608
What the fuck are you saying

sex

>>7776608
keked hard, good job nigga

>>7771973 (OP)
Isn't this the SCP that needs to drink cum to survive?

>>7771973 (OP)
dead faun storage

>>7777111
Holy 7777111

>>7777179
Sex

>>7771973 (OP)
Females with antlers is my pet peeve. Actually I don’t like anthros in general but fortunately I can draw whatever I want

>>7777890
She's a reindeer

>>7777890
heterochromia is my pet peeve

>>7778103
Kino

create

deer sex

>>7771973 (OP)
It's not ugly, it's just incompetent when it comes to fundamentals.
Biggest offender is the short torso compared to the length of the arms.

>>7775335
Your lines aren't wonky at all. They feel intentional and there's confidence behind them.
Improve your hands though. They are a very important and expressive part of our anatomy.

>>7779559
chibi?

>>7779644
no

xdessex

>>7779797
Sex

sex

This artist has a webcomic btw

>>7782501
where

>>7782542
under where

CRACK 166
CRACK 166
CRACK 166

>>7782501
https://m.webtoons.com/en/canvas/misfits-in-toyland/list?title_no=950471

Made
For

>>7783538
No

>>7783998
Yes

how to draw her?

>>7785433
idk

>>7785433
>7785433
idk