>>211669465>you are causing quietly the death of 10,000 children, labelling it as acceptable collateral damage.That's a false equivalence, but fine - I'll take the bait.
It is acceptable collateral damage, if you look at the overall militant to civilian rates (between 1:2 to 1:3 by most estimates), which is considered to be a good ratio. Most conflicts have a rate of 1:9 or higher, which goes to show you that in such a densely populated area there was an effort to avoid civilian casualties.
Also, the fact that there are children there doesn't mean that you cannot attack - let's say that terrorists could do a massive terrorist attack, and then go back to their enclave and know that there would be no retaliation since there are children there. there's a very good reason that this is not the world that we live in.
>>211669493>>why do people i stole lands from, kill the kids and keeps doing atrocities dare to resist??The lands were never theirs to begin with, back when the british were here a little less than 90% was british owned land that was completely empty.
Also, a lot of Arabs came here in the early 20th century after jews economically devloped this place, most of them weren't here for very long before the war of independence.
They could have accepted the partition plan and had their state by now, but they refused.