This concept is completely beyond the mental faculties of all Romance speakers.

>>211683502 (OP)
Just came in your mom's pussy.
Just came on your face.

>>211683502 (OP)
?
Pisicuțele sunt ÎN cutie.
Ceașca este PE masă

>>211683502 (OP)
Les chatons sont DANS la boîte
La tasse est SUR la table
This is not twitter you don't have to do retarded engagement bait

>>211683502 (OP)
How do you say

I buy books (in general)
and
I buy THE books (those specific books talked about earlier in the context)
?

>>211684146
In Slavic languages, you just make the specification when needed. Articles are pure cope for languages with devolved case systems. Case in point: there are no articles in Latin.

>>211684234
You can have articles and cases in the same language and this gives even better nuance.

>>211684418
Somehow neither Latin not Slavic languages lose nuance. If I want to make it clear that it’s a specific set of books, I emphasize it already. So you’re talking out of your ass.

>>211683502 (OP)
Not true but the do/make distinction actually tends to broke our anuses.

>>211683502 (OP)
Il gatto è NELLA (in the) scatola
la tazza è SUL (on the) tavolo

>>211684581
>scatola
kek

>>211684592
Just because of the scat inital?
We can found countless words like that, it can be funny if you're still young enough.

>>211684128
Now translate en

you post
>in generals
>on threads
>both abstract intangible concepts

>>211683502 (OP)
>In
Literally borrowed from latin.

>>211686398
Example from a modern romance language: OP vai a fare IN culo