>>211894116That's basically what the Romans did irl to counter it.
>>211894077 (OP)>>211894212>>211894854>>211895386The Romans regularly beat phalanxes through superior flexibility.
Roman legions could be divided up into smaller units that could act independently, unlike the rigid phalanxes that were bulky, cumbersome and needed flat ground to maintain cohesion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Magnesia
>the best phalangites of all manage to hold their ground against legionnaires, then get flanked by skirmishers and have to flee under a hail of projectiles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cynoscephalae
>the Macedonian right flank is slowly winning when their left flank collapses, which allows the Romans over there to send a small detachment to flank the Macedonian right and rout themhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chaeronea_(86_BC)
>legionnaires charge low quality phalangites head on and crush them instantly by pushing their pikes to the sideshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Orchomenus
>phalanx gets disorganized, Romans charge them and BTFO them