>>211910976>It's more of a social phenomenon than a physical one.Then it's not a phenomenon at all, it's a dressing. Trans-gender means transition between sex.
A human being adhering to conventional biology can't transition between sex, because sex is a function, and transitory states between them don't exist without unnatural means.
Only things that can be actual transgenders are eldritch abominations.
>When gays come to equasion, your argument falls flat.It does not. You simply assume primitivity and singularity of outcomes.
Gays are either my aforementioned example, broken toys, or artificial constructions.
Deviations from human spiritual baseline don't happen just because.
>And I'm a straight guy, and my libido subsumed my soul a long time ago. Changed nothing in a matter of my sexuality. That's strike two.High libido isn't and doesn't guarantee subsumation, Mr. Straight Guy or whatever you are in particular. You don't quite understand what subsumation is at those levels when it does happen, or what subsumation looks like at all, unless you're lying for the sake of it.
You crossdresser or something?
Either way, that was a rhetorical example to quickly reference how such thing happen, not a statement of singular conclusions.