Don't you hate it when you're discussing a topic relevant to your smaller region with a person from a neighboring nation when a new worlder Waltz in, guns blazing, 0 fucks given, and gives his retarded two zembabweian cents which is completely uninformed, and nonsensical to an offensive degree and makes everyone dumber for being exposed to their retardation.
How could a new worlder, tucked in the further corner away from the old world and have any understand of topics you cannot at all feel or understand the real weight of, have 0 connections to or the people involved in it, not understand the historical context yet feel confident enough to shit out your retarded take with the arrogance only a true imbecile can muster?
I hereby disallow all new worlders from commenting on old world affairs, Vice versa isn't true since the old world begot the new world and therefore understand them better than themselves.
>>211911782 (OP)This flag has never made a good post.
>>211911782 (OP)Or maybe you're too close to these issues to understand them as objectively as "new worlders" and find our cunning insights to be offensive as a result
>>211911837You want to tell me a mutt or an argue knows more about the history of north African interactions enough not only to lecture Tunisians, Algerians, Moroccans, and Libyans on it, but to completely restructure it according to his own whims based on shit he made up in his head on the spot based on broad stereotypes?
>>211911892Stereotypes exist for a reason so basically, yes.
>>211912047The culture and people and their history Span for far longer than the inception of modern republics and countries in their new names, something far more ancient predated them and the current is a continuation of the old, if you like at American history it's not even 250 years old, meanwhile the history of my people and my land is 3k old and that's a mild estimate.
When was the current existing government first established is not the end all be all you think it is for this debate.
>>211912104Don't support me.
>>211912063Give up zebbi, taw enta rajel?
>>211912307>American history it's not even 250 years oldWhy do you start counting your history from before independence but you don't do the same thing for English America? Jamestown was founded in 1607.
>The culture and people and their history Span for far longer than the inception of modern republics and countries in their new names, something far more ancient predated them and the current is a continuation of the oldThis is the same thing as trying present Peru as a continuation of the Inca Empire or "Egypt" (actually "borderland" in Arabic) as the same thing as the country of the pharaohs
I inherently trust people who have no connection to a conflict or region over people who do
>>211912565Amerikkka= white devils
Tunis= land of Providence and countless riches both material and immaterial
>>211912047this map is pretty bullshit. why is france, which has gone through a revolution, 4 republics and a bunch of empires, considered to have formed in the 900s while russia, which was the beating heart of the ussr, is considered to have formed in the 90s?
>>211912047this map actually shows a lack of history. if your country has had no meaninful regime change in 300 years it's because nothing happens there. take the united states, where the only significant national happening was a brief civil war in the 1800s and they're still obsessed with it
>>211913809Because Russia spent almost the entire 20th century as part of another country and France didn't
>>211911782 (OP)I do love that, you have no idea
