Thread 211955899

are you intellectually deficient in your country
>flag
>yes :(

>>211955899 (OP)
Do I even need to answer?

>>211955932
i bet you are plenty smart anon
smart people come from all over

>>211955899 (OP)
many people say or said I'm quite smart but I believe they are extremely dumb and I deeply hate to receive this compliment

>>211956029
what kind of compliment do you prefer to receive instead

>>211955899 (OP)
No but I wish I was

>>211956082
why do you want to be slow

>>211956064
good question I don't really know. I automatically think any compliment is a facade built to hide something others don't want to say for this or that social norm

>>211956124
The only things that have any strong correlation with having a high IQ in life are scoring well on IQ tests and mental illness.

>>211955932
>We are surrounded by dumb niggers
Checks out

>>211956135
i do this too and i dont know why
it feels bad assuming everyone is mean
>>211956164
but you can be mentally ill and slow at the same time...

>>211956213
I feel pretty fine assuming everybody wants to harm me desu dude
paranoia is a goos survival mechanism: creatures not paranoid about predators are extinct many many years ago

also maybe unconsciously I could crave for a TOTAL EGO DEATH

>>211956369
>I feel pretty fine assuming everybody wants to harm me desu dude
i wanna believe in human goodness
>TOTAL EGO DEATH
scary

>>211956464
pretty scary yeah but consciousness scares me more
I don't really believe in goodness at all

>>211956582
>pretty scary yeah but consciousness scares me more
understandable
>I don't really believe in goodness at all
also understandable but it makes me sad

>>211955899 (OP)
No I'm an absolute genius but i'm considered retarded by the average retard here

>>211955932
What do the Anons here think about this IQ study?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088505/#bibr4-0956797618774253
Tl:dr 1 extra year of education = 2~ extra IQ points

>>211956800
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088505/ * sorry for the citation link i meant the study by Staurt et al. Not the 4th citation

>>211956974
>>211956800
It looks like an exercise in overfitting. they funnel down a huge number of studies according to some cooked up criteria that seem quite arbitrary.

Meta analyses in a soft field like pscyhology where janky ass statistics are commonplace are just tea leaf divination.

>>211957324
>>211956974
>>211956800
see the criteria, they're quite vague and even then they just go "yeah but we included these studies that didn't actually meet the criteria because we guess the affected part of the data set is small". fucking soybergs.