>You will never live in an independent CSA
>You will never be rich off the fortune your ancestors left you 200 years ago
>You will never oversee your pickaninnies working hard in the fields your great-great-great-great-great grandfather broke ground on
>You will never own a plantation in every state + the Mexican/Carribean territories
>You will never own a gun collection with +1500 pieces
>You will never ride the mag-lev train from Richmond to Dallas
>You will never buy the highest quality tobacco from a local Mexican farmer
>You will never eat a Tex/Mex/Cajun feast in the back of your limousine while the black boy who's family has served yours since the 1600s drives you around
>You will never get fresh produce directly from the territory of Davis (Formerly Nicaragua)
>You will never get a tax write-off for donating to feed starving Yankee children
>You will never take your 6 children to the blackface minstrel show
>You will never spend the winter at your modest 75 bedroom vacation home in Arkansas
>You will never eat a 4 course meal with your family prepared by your wife's mammy servants
>You will never relieve yourself with your personal harem of bedwenches
>You will never put your kids to sleep with stories of how their forefathers won their independence from the tyrannical Yankee empire
>You will never go to sleep listening to the news anchor talking about the CS Airforce bombing some backwards third-world shithole
This is what was stolen from us.

>>212017855 (OP)
>implying CSA would keep slavery in the current year

>>212017878
They could enslave them through economic means like how Mexicans are enslaved in the modern US.

>>212017855 (OP)
So many BBCS and muhfugging fuball y'all. Imma eatings my cornbread while leCushon fucks my bitch wife BALL OFF TOP

>>212017948
>bending the definitions

>>212017855 (OP)
The south was let off easy. We should have killed every southern leader and confiscated lands from any officer of the confederacy. The south should burned far more than what Sherman did

>>212018340
least bloodthirsty Y*nkee

>>212018340
>freedom hell yeah down with the English oppressors
>NOOOO YOU CANNOT JUST LEAVE YOU DESERVE GENOCIDE

>>212018340
I'd rape you irl, yankee.

You assholes deserve another Sherman's March

>>212018586
Mexican or black. Call it.

>>212017855 (OP)
>He thinks he'd be an aristocrat instead of a Wash Jones

>>212018808
sheeid these fucking yankeees will never know the glory of having a BBC servant.

>>212018376
your opinion means nothing
>>212018379
fuck slave owners, fuck seccesionists, and fuck you
>>212018545
you wont do shit, pussy

>>212018934
>>212019263
Lol brown faggots.

>>212020578
go back to fucking your sister, cletus and stop dreaming of tearing my country apart

>>212017855 (OP)
Even if they won 99% of southerners still wouldn't have had that.

>>212019263
>fuck seccesionists
Don’t be too harsh on yourself.

>>212019263
>fuck slave owners, fuck seccesionists, and fuck you
Why do you hate George Washington so much but think you’re a patriot? I’m from Utah and just laugh at the seething east coastoids have for each other. I do think southerners are mostly right though in that their beliefs are much closer to what the founders intended. Hating southerners is a way of outing yourself as a euro trash post civil war wog without saying it.

>>212021077
>their beliefs are much closer to what the founders intended
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjsxhYetLM0

I wish they had won so that all the blacks would've been forced to stay there and couldn't wander up north to make our cities shitholes.

>>212017855 (OP)
The South was never going to win regardless. Slavery was becoming uneconomical due to the industrial revolution. In fact, southern leaders almost freed all the slaves when they seceded but didn't in order to keep the extremists on their side (sounds familiar?). The Brits saw the writing on the wall earlier and abolished slavery not because they are enlightened, but because they knew it was no longer profitable.

>>212017948
So basically the CSA would just be an Anglo version of Mexico or Brazil

>>212021339
It already is, by all accounts.

>>212021077
lol the south was full of loyalists during the revolution too. Just face it, you hate America and always have

I don't understand.

>>212021317
>The South was never going to win regardless
Not in the long run by themselves, which was why the entire strategy of the CSA was to win decisive victories against the Union and press their initial advantage to get Britain and France to intercede on their behalf.

>>212021385
>to get Britain and France to intercede on their behalf
Britain had absolutely nothing to gain from allying the CSA. They were a direct competitor with the British Raj in cotton trade. France had good relations with the US and had no reason to ruin them.

>>212017855 (OP)
The south will rise again

>you will never live in a country where the majority of the population are niggers

>>212018340
Based.

>>212021446
>Britain had absolutely nothing to gain from allying the CSA. They were a direct competitor with the British Raj in cotton trade. France had good relations with the US and had no reason to ruin them.
I'm not saying it was a sound strategy, only that it was their strategy. It's true that in a broad sense the British upper class felt some sense of kinship with the Confederate aristocracy since they were essentially cousins, but the general antipathy they felt towards the Union wasn't nearly enough to motivate them towards any serious geopolitical actions in favor of the CSA besides some minor aid and allowing them to pay to build warships in the UK.

>>212021858
>felt some sense of kinship with the Confederate aristocracy
The Confederate "aristocracy" wasn't an aristocracy. They were commoners. Having money and slaves doesn't ennoble you.

>>212021899
>They were commoners. Having money and slaves doesn't ennoble you.
Doesn't it? If you control all the wealthy land and concentrate yourselves on estates where you only marry into other landed elites, that's an aristocracy in every meaningful sense of the word.

>>212022556
It doesn’t. You’re a noble if your parents are noblemen. And the notion of aristocracy makes no sense in a revolutionary republic. It’s an Ancien Regime notion that requires an estates social stratification.

>>212018835
>Faulkner readers on /int/
God this place is SO MUCH BETTER than /litshit/

>>212022665
>And the notion of aristocracy makes no sense in a revolutionary republic
America has never been a revolutionary republic. Our war of independence was to entrench traditional rights and freedoms we'd held for nearly 200 years already at that point.
>It’s an Ancien Regime notion that requires an estates social stratification.
Meanwhile Napoleon was handing out noble titles like candy to everyone who pleased him not even 15 years after the Revolution

>>212022913
You literally rejected the monarchy. You’re the definition of a revolutionary republic. You had no estates, you had secularism, you had the constitution. All revolutionary notions. There was no legally protected class of people who were considered superior by right of birth. That’s what nobles are. The only way you become a noble is either you’re born to nobles or the monarch ennobles you. You can be poor as shit and not have any political weight, but you’re still a noble.

The word you’re looking for is an oligarchy.

All these yankee larps are irish and shitalian btw

>>212021339
as if it isnt already?

>>212021139
>atun-shei
Croation with a hook nosed that could hunt birds. Argument dismissed.

>>212023310
>guy spends an hour with a well-prepared list of arguments and a bibliography
>but muh ad hominem
too much reading for y'all, Cleetus?

>>212021368
No the south wanted to expand west the most while Brit cucks wouldn’t let them. The best founding fathers were from Virginia for the most part. Hamilton wanted America to have a king and lords and to resemble European monarchy and he is buried in wall street and niggers quite literally sing his praise to this day because hamiltonianism is tyranny for the white man.

>>212023354
I’m familiar with his content more than you are. Yes I can dismiss him out right for being Croatian half breed with a nose used as an industrial wind mill blade.

>>212017878
Of course not, they'd just have Jim Crowe non-citizen guest workers like the Saudis do.

>>212023554
gigabased

>>212023354
You are arguing with a Mormon, these people are basically white Muslims who believe in a 19th century conman's tall tale and wrap their entire lives around it
They live in a fantasy world

>>212023446
I'll admit you to B B C correction free of charge friend

>>212023664
No more fantastical than the rest of Christianity.
>>212024398
Average atun-shei tranny.

>>212025307
Atun shei is too considerate to reduce black men to BBC's. The offer stands

>>212025543
Why haven’t you just gotten around to killing yourself yet? Are you that much of a failure you can’t even plan out your own suicide?

>>212017855 (OP)
In reality you would have eventually become Haiti 2.0 once enough BBC warriors, which you would have bred by picking out the strongest most black men, were born to rebel against you faggots.

>>212027554
The only reason Haiti failed was a lack of buck breaking. The south never suffered an uprising because of how downright peculiar their bucks were.