'Republic' is a high level term denoting a polity in which ultimate sovereignty lies with the people. Republics often define themselves by having a constitution (in which the sovereignty of the people is legitimised in law) and/or opposition to monarchy (a system in which ultimate sovereignty resides in a single individual). Republics can take many different forms, and they are not always democratic. Russia, Iran and China are republics.
'Democracy' denotes a particular system of government - namely one in which the people have a direct and regular participatory role in government. This is usually via the election of representatives, but can also entail direct voting on legislation. Democracies are not always republics. Monarchies like Britiain, Canada and Norway are democracies.
PS - 'the people' can be defined however the fuck you want. A democracy in which only landowners or males can vote is still a democracy.
PPS - representative democracy is still democracy, in fact it's the most practical and common form of democracy. Direct democracy is not a 'purer' form of democracy, it's mostly considered an outdated and flawed system that has rarely been seen outside tiny ancient city states
>>212021592No it's not. You can have democratic monarchies. These terms belong to different realms.
>>212021876You have regulated and direct public participation in government (elections), therefore you are a democracy. Oligarchy and aristocracy can co-exist with democracy.
>>212022066Lots of countries have semi-autonomous subdivisions. How does that make you undemocratic?
>>212024805Most democracies started out with a strictly limited franchise. They were still democracies, it's just that not everyone was granted democratic rights