they probably would stop being 3rd world if they just improved the lives of the poorest and lifted them out of poverty, like china did

damn why didn't we think of that?

They'd probably stop being poor if they weren't all lazy liars

Working with pajeets single handedly made me start hating browns

>>212027829
I don't know, China did. Maybe you just don't care about the poorest and that's why your country looks like it looks

>>212028103
China's poor are still miserable.

>>212027829
Well, why didn't you? For a start you need controls on internal migration. You also need to stop Larping as a counter balance to anything. Your military's a disgusting hotpotch of equipment partly because of this. Do you have any cities under the direct control of central govt? You should because I know muh democracy means at regional level it is very difficult politically to get anything.

More than that India is disgusting because of its people's behaviour. So at least keep the disgusting things you do contained domestically.

>>212029858
government-led projects are difficult to take place in Asian countries like India, China, and Japan because of corrupt politicians.
any attempt to support populace ends up a money draining system for the parliamentarians, bureaucrats, and ""nonprofit""-organizations.

>>212030057
>government-led projects are difficult to take place in Asian countries like India, China, and Japan because of corrupt politicians.
This is the case everywhere. All politicians are corrupt.

>>212027829
because jeets are natural narcissists and need to feel superior to someone, in your case dalits.

if indias poor was lifted out of poverty it would cause an existential crisis in ruling class jeets