Put me in coach Xi. I can do it

im also ready to breed the chinese women

>>212074415 (OP)
>*riiiiiiiiiiing*
>Yes.
>Yu plegnant nao?
>No.
>Yu carr me when plegnant!
>*slam

Low birthrates being bad is a meme, the only ones who lose are jews and jewlikes who lose their hordes of cheap labor and old cunts who want 5 more euros in their retirement check. Better technology + more automation + less people means more resources and better living for everyone who remains. You don't have to pop out 11 kids anymore just to barely keep a farm afloat.

>>212074628
kek

So if I do it I get an harassement lawsuit but when the chinese government does it its based and redpilled?

>>212074415 (OP)
Looks like it's my time to shine

>>212074681
China also has one of the lowest retirement ages in the world. All they have to do is lift it by like 5 years and they automatically kick the can down the road by at least another century.

>>212074415 (OP)
This is actually really funny and I think every country should do it even if it has to be a citizen movement

>>212074464
>>212074563
>>212074732

>>212074681
If your country has public healthcare and pensions it's megabad because you're going to be taxed to death to support a billion elderly boomers.

>>212074745
They already increased it a couple of years ago.

>>212074745
sorry, sweatie

>>212074877
just make boomers pay for their own healthcare and/or cut their pensions.

>>212075066
>just make boomers
Guess who's in charge of making the policies

>>212074918
From 60 to 63, they could definitely afford to raise it to 65.

>>212075100
Not even that, it's just that they know they lose their entire voterbase because too much old population = gerontocracy who sells the younger generations' future just to live a bit more comfortably. Yeah, we're kinda fucked

>>212074628
haha

>You can't do things that hurt the boomers as you'll lose their votes
Wait a second they're a commie state, fuck the boomers

>>212074628
Lmaoo

>>212074745
>by at least another century.
You don't know much about math, they can gain just a few years that way.
But alt least they won't have immigration.
>>212074681
Unlike portugal and the rest of europe.
People don't realize how bad it is, but for europe or SK is too late anyway so little would change.

Why don't they just do a childless tax like the soviets did

>>212075645
>they can gain just a few years that way
Until what?

>>212075876
The usual of a dyiing society.
Too many pensioners, not enough workers.
Irreversible decline.

>>212075176
Yeah, it's how Japan ended up in their current state. Money goes to boomers because they are the ones who support political parties.

>>212076031
People doomsay this constantly, I've yet to see historical precedence of it actually happening. China already has too many people and high youth unemployment because they're adopting widespread automation across all sectors. So telling me there won't be enough workers is already bullshit.

>>212075660
Because thats already a thing everywhere, except instead of calling it a "childless tax" they call it a "tax benefit for married couples"
Chuds are an oppressed minority

>>212076302
>People doomsay this constantly, I've yet to see historical precedence of it actually happening.

why would there be a historical precedent?

>>212076341
You shouldn't just reward sex havers, you need to actively punish incels. My prediction is that as long as nobody has the balls to implement this the fertility crisis will continue

>>212074415 (OP)
if i get calls from numbers i just dont answer that shit. easy solution

>>212076688
Exactly.

>>212074877
Just have healthcare coverage cap beyond a certain age say 85 or something if you live this long it's not worth keeping your prune ass around anymore

>>212075323
Serving your boomer parents is the highest Confucian ideal. It survived the cultural revolution. They kept up lockdowns for a year after vaccines were out to keep protecting boomers. The party leadership are boomers. It's not happening.

>>212077124
What I mean is, the current situation is unprecedented, specifically the availability of contraception and women's independence. There can't *be* a precedent for the consequences of prolonged below replacement birth rates if we never had the conditions for low birth rates before.

>>212076741
>actively punish incels
having kid costs like 1 million to 10 million, per kid
living through divorce costs your mental health and often more than half of your cash plus gettting into mild debt for the next ~18 years
being okay parent costs you like 4 hours of extra unpaid labor daily for a decade

frankly speaking i cannot imagine punishment strong enough to act as motivation to have sex. our society is broken. telling people to have kids is like telling workers to work for free.

it is not economically viable to have babies and we transformed our whole society into rat race where only measure of success are money.

>>212074415 (OP)
Is the next white monkey job gonna be impregnating chinese hags?

>>212074628
>*riiiiiiing*
>Yes
>Yu plegnant nao?
>Yes.
>Boy or Girl?
>Girl.
>Yu carr me when yu get Boy!
>*slam*

>>212074415 (OP)
Sounds more like they're trying to gauge people's plans for having kids. Why is this being framed as some horrible dystopian thing? We get calls here trying to gauge how we'll vote. It's all for metrics.

>>212078206
I can't breed!!!

>>212078585
>Why is this being framed as some horrible dystopian thing?
because it's China

>>212077574
Eh, debatable. Unlike France or Italy, China doesn’t have a system where retired boomers have a higher income than working age people, financed by the latter. Pensions are very low and most old people will probably continue working until ded.

>>212078619
I mean I imagine they could just hang up, and suffer no consequences. Same as here.

>>212074415 (OP)
>Importing a bunch of third worlders to fill the population gap
>"Yes the democratic way!"
>Try to understand why people won't have kids by calling them up
>"NOOO that's so dystopian!!!"

Just impregnate them

>>212074681
Listen to yourself for fuck's sake. You're saying that "Jews" need more wageslaves, but you're also saying that automation will cover everything so it doesn't matter. Which is it? Typical braindead reddit opinion by the way, just replace "Jews" with "le capitalism"