>>212097566It is way more likely that someone makes fun of you for sounding "redneck" than someone making fun of you for sounding LA, get where I'm going?
>accent in and of itself says nothing of ones moral character or intellectAccent is a marker where you grew up, what social strata you belong to and so on. Accent points out whether you have attained higher education and the list goes on and on. It should be noted that this is GENERALLY what is believed, of course, there are exceptions (e.g. Bernie Sanders)
>Linguistics tends to take a more neutral and objective approach these daysLinguistics studies language as it is, with all of its variation and nuances.
I'm talking about foreign language learning here. As a non-native you are highly advised to follow the rules. Otherwise it can get messy. What if you learn the accent of one group, but you encounter someone from a second group?
If you get around to speaking and listening Portuguese, it is going to be on the internet, where you will be exposed to shit tons of different accents, dialects and shit. Now image you open up a dictionary to look up the word and can't find it, because no one bothered to translate the dialect or slang to English. Same goes for pronunciation. The list goes on and on. That's why you have a standard form taught to everyone. Most people in these countries go to school and actually know the words everyone can understand.
You shouldn't really dabble with accents unless you are an advanced speaker. And then you should ask yourself is the information you are getting reliable. That article the Canadian guy linked was written by some guy called Cladio. Well, guess what, Claudio is nowhere to be found on the internet. How did he conduct his studies? Where he got his information from?
CONT.