Anonymous
6/30/2025, 4:10:48 AM No.212259577
>I'm going to make women absolutely repulsed by balding
>also most men will go bald lmao
>also most men will go bald lmao
Replies:
Thread 212259577 - /int/ [Archived: 723 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 4:12:03 AM No.212259588
>>212259577 (OP)
t. Pelado
t. Pelado
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 4:30:15 AM No.212259818
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 4:49:32 AM No.212260056
>>212259577 (OP)
It is mostly a White issue. About 80% of White men will experience balding, whereas of the other races it varies from 50-20% depending on the race, with Asians having the lowest rates.
It is mostly a White issue. About 80% of White men will experience balding, whereas of the other races it varies from 50-20% depending on the race, with Asians having the lowest rates.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:06:29 AM No.212260268
>>212260206
>Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?
>Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>A college degree? In that field?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>Um.. Nope, still haven't.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
>Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?
>Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>A college degree? In that field?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>Um.. Nope, still haven't.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:15:25 AM No.212260423
>>212260268
Yes. I am asking for someone to provide their claim. Of course a Brazilian would take everything at face value.
Yes. I am asking for someone to provide their claim. Of course a Brazilian would take everything at face value.
