Thread 212340519

why do white people mention IQ is 100% genetic when they talk about black IQ buit mention IQ is a 100% cultural thing when they mention East asian IQ?

Also citing selection bias when talking about Chinese/Jews etc., but ignoring the blatant, actually documented methodological errors made in African nations by so-called "IQ researchers".

>>212340519 (OP)
Hey it's me, all white people. I'm doing this specific thing just to spite you personally haha. Faggot.

>>212340574
so what’s one well known product from sub saharan Africa?

I don't think anyone says that. The mean in many Asian countries - well, only really in Japan, SK, and Taiwan - is in fact the highest. But the distribution is narrower. This leads to societies that function more easily, but they don't produce very many geniuses. White people have a very wide distribution, leading to pretty well-functioning societies for the most part that produce many geniuses and many idiots. Niggers are all super retarded except for a few smart men, one in a million, who are not geniuses but pretty smart overall (niggers have produced exactly 0 geniuses in history).

>>212340632
watermelon and coffee, also domestication of fire.

>>212340680
>east asians don't produce geniuses
Nigger, even negros produce geniuses like carver and chihua achebe.

you're fucking retarded.
lmao.

>>212340680
>one in a million
Being a university grad makes me "one in a million"?

>>212340760
Yeah, like I said, 0 geniuses.

>>212340714
east africans aren’t considered sub saharans tho

>>212340784
Universities aren't what they used to be. Pic related is why student debt in America is so insanely out of control. Turns out it's all because of a bunch of niggers taking out loans for useless degrees and then not paying them back.

>>212340519 (OP)
>whites are more succesful than browns because we're genetically and culturally superior
>jews are more succesful than goys because they're subversive and deceitful

>>212340922
>>212340947
>carver is not a genius
>one of the most relevant agronomist of USA during the 19 century is not a genius because muh feefees about blacks
Carver made the first geological map of USA.

What have you done with your superior brain?

>>212341066
Newton, Darwin, Einstein, Mozart, da Vinci.... and Carver.

Yeah, no. That nigger was no genius and he doesn't belong on any list with the aforementioned giants. Stop being ridiculous.

>>212341151
He was a polymath, fucking imbecile chud.

He displayed an interest in a wide range of skills, including painting and music as well as science.

>>212341230
You don't seem to be able to grasp basic patterns. How fitting.

I've never seen that. Most agree it's around 80% genetic. It's a great proxy for intelligence but imperfect as well, it doesn't capture some other traits. Blacks for instance are stupid but creative.

Think East Asians might be smarter overall. People just don't realize or acknowledge or like to discuss how much personality plays into success.

>>212341286
Yeah, their chaotic, stupid nature is their weakness, but it is also their strength. They can be very amusing entertainers.

>>212340990
>Universities aren't what they used to be.
That's a sad sour grape cope to make. What do you get put of this exactly?

>>212341260
you seem to imply genius is a mythical cathegory that only 12 people on history has archieved.

He displayed many genius traits, like high intelligence and a interest in becoming a polymath.

He also displayed skills in both the arts and the sciences, having skills in both painting, music, as well interest in research in botanics and agronomy.

He's still on the same cathegory as renaissance polymaths, because he displays the same characteristics of a quatrocento vitrivius male.

Also, there's not an easy way to rank geniuses, simply because each one is so diferent from another, that even trying to rank or compare them, across some diferent fields is an intelectual ego masturbation.

Shakespeare by example, had not contributions besides writing.
Meanwhile Da vince had not proper contributions in engineering, and mostly hist archievements are in painting.
Beethoven had also no major contribution outside music composition.

So how do you rank them when their body of work is literally on diferent skills.

Likewise, carver archievements stem mostly in his own field of agronomy and soil preservation, and the research of the peanut.

So how do you rank Netwon againts carver, when newton has no contributions to agronomy?

Man, chuds are fucking iliiterate subhumans.

>>212341286
>Blacks for instance are stupid but creative.
>>212341341
>their chaotic, stupid nature is their weakness, but it is also their strength
This isn't an RPG nor LoTR

>>212341379
Well, they're not. They used to be places for intelligent people to develop themselves. Now they're for anyone, including stupid niggers.

>>212341403
I'm not reading your wall of retarded, communist, reddit-spaced nigger drivel. Fuck off.

>>212341403
>that redditspacing
bioleninist kid malding hard

>>212341411
Groups do in fact exhibit traits.

>>212340680
Let's assume they have lower std, by 2 points of std.
100 iq with std of 15 will produce 2% of people with iq 130+
105 iq with std of 13 will produce 3% of people with iq of 130+

>>212341455
>>212341461
how do you rank geniuses when they are in diferent fields, retarded chud.

carver was an agronomist and his archievements are in agronomy.

Whites are like the Mario of races. Good at everything but outclassed in some specific things by some races that maxed out the category.

>>212341533
>whites historical average is to be a peasant serf in a village with no education just to die of famine or some shit like viking raids
>WE WUZ LE VITRIVIOUS MALE OF BOETHIUS THAT SQUARED THE CIRCLE OF ALL RACES AND SHIT

feels good to actually be able to talk about non european geniuses, unlike pol imbeciles.

>>212341403
There are multiple records of Leonardo da Vinci traveling everywhere in war-torn northern and central italy, lending his skills in engineering to god knows how many petty lords and barons, building siege engines for offense and helping improve fortifications' defenses in exchange for money. His work in the fine arts such as paintings was only one of his many talents.
You sir are an ignorant jigaboo silverback gorilla nigger.

>>212341470
Lmao not like some scrappy RPG. Especially with the huge variation within these groups let alone families.

>>212341835
To answer your question: No, you're not one in a million.

>>212341455
>They used to be places for intelligent people to develop themselves.
They still do mostly research. Do you rip shit off American boomer talking points in Facebook?

>>212340632
slaves
bananas
gold

>>212341665
>dude, leonardo was a craftment doing engineering work for sieges
So, what a normal average engineer does today, retard?

He was just an engineer doing bitch as commision works in an era where 98% of the population couldn't read.

He wasn't a philosopher or matematician, unlike descartes or newtons.
He had not legacy of math discoveries.

>but he had le funny mirror writing about le submarine and le tank
Many which were only replicated in some discovery channel show, but had no particular effect in the history of war.

You can feed a black child the best foods, have him in a affluent family, best teachers and best education around but you can never take out the nigger inside of him.

>>212340519 (OP)
I thought the cope was that east asians have a higher IQ but they are less creative, and Jews have a higher IQ but they are evil. So higher IQ in those cases doesn't matter

>>212341992

It's true, and their IQ is like 2 points higher anyway so who cares

>>212341586

>YOU CAN'T CLAIM THE GREAT THINGS YOUR PEOPLE HAVE DONE BECAUSE I'M A STUPID NIGGER

thanks for sharing!

>IQ is a 100% cultural thing
This is correct. But for whatever reason people assume that culture can be changed on a whim or at worst in a couple of generations as opposed to genetics. In reality, cultures don't want to change, with very few exceptions that involve total subjugation and deliberate effort from the invaders. The whole reason a culture exists is to separate a group from other groups, you can't change it by "starting from yourself". The group should be devastated to trigger a global change.

So, if you're from a low-IQ culture, most likely you will be a low IQ macaque.

>>212342082
It's funny because I have more artistic and intelectual skills than the faggots calling me a subhuman negro.

It's like a bushmen cracker calling me a manlet when I'm like 8 feet tall.

>>212341992
Asians aren't uncreative, the things they do in their media and especially music is extremely creative

>>212340519 (OP)
There are a couple of smart black people.

>>212341403
>reddit spacing wall of text