>>212755436I agree with you that having needlessly complicated and archaic systems is a quintessentially Anglo thing, so hating on it is something an ESL would do. But objectively getting rid of that complexity is an improvement as it doesn't serve any role besides maybe being a window into the language's past if you're really into linguistics.
>Outdated spellings that reflect how a word was said in the 14th century or that directly borrow from various foreign languages with completely different writing systems? Hell yeah let's make a language out of those.
>Metric? Nah fuck that logical and consistent shit, we use feet and armpits here because that's how we've always done it.
>12 pence to the shilling and 20 shillings to the pound? That's right, multiples of 10 are gay and French.
>Luv me king, luv me nobility and hereditary titles forming part of the government to this day, now let me tell you what class I'm from and use the appropriate register for it. So yes, simplifying spelling is quite anti-English, the Anglo spirit is all about conserving these systems for the sake of tradition and continuity, change is too radical.