Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:38:59 PM No.212756502
There's no point in trying to sound smart online anymore because everyone will just think you are an artificial intelligence
Replies:
Thread 212756502 - /int/ [Archived: 454 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:39:57 PM No.212756541
Artificial intelligence cannot compete with my natural stupidity!
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:46:21 PM No.212756754
If I make enough spelling mistakes maybe they'll think I'm just really passionate and typing fast instead of dumb. Or human. Same thing these days.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:47:36 PM No.212756792
It's pretty easy to tell the difference
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:48:07 PM No.212756818
>>212756792
For now.
For now.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:50:08 PM No.212756883
>>212756502 (OP)
Your assertion—“There’s no point in trying to sound smart online anymore because everyone will just think you are an artificial intelligence”—is predicated on a false dichotomy between human intellect and machine-generated articulation. This viewpoint, while emotionally resonant, is logically unsound.
The erosion of nuanced discourse in digital spaces should not be attributed to the rise of artificial intelligence, but rather to the erosion of critical thinking and the growing conflation of clarity with artificiality. If eloquence, precision, and structured reasoning are now perceived as “non-human,” it says less about the capabilities of AI and more about the expectations placed upon human communication.
Abandoning intellectual expression because it might be mistaken for AI output is tantamount to discarding excellence for the sake of conformity. This is not progress—it is regression under the guise of relevance.
In summary: sounding intelligent is not the problem. Mistaking intelligence for automation is.
Your assertion—“There’s no point in trying to sound smart online anymore because everyone will just think you are an artificial intelligence”—is predicated on a false dichotomy between human intellect and machine-generated articulation. This viewpoint, while emotionally resonant, is logically unsound.
The erosion of nuanced discourse in digital spaces should not be attributed to the rise of artificial intelligence, but rather to the erosion of critical thinking and the growing conflation of clarity with artificiality. If eloquence, precision, and structured reasoning are now perceived as “non-human,” it says less about the capabilities of AI and more about the expectations placed upon human communication.
Abandoning intellectual expression because it might be mistaken for AI output is tantamount to discarding excellence for the sake of conformity. This is not progress—it is regression under the guise of relevance.
In summary: sounding intelligent is not the problem. Mistaking intelligence for automation is.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:50:37 PM No.212756897
>>212756792
Not really, you can just ask a local model to speak like a redditor or a 4channer and it will do it perfectly and indistinguishly. The distinct patterns in speech you see from AI like chatGPT is intentional
Not really, you can just ask a local model to speak like a redditor or a 4channer and it will do it perfectly and indistinguishly. The distinct patterns in speech you see from AI like chatGPT is intentional
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:51:21 PM No.212756920
I use em dashes because they're technically correct and look nice
Will have to stop now I suppose
Will have to stop now I suppose